Comparing field-based monitoring and remote-sensing, using deforestation from logging at Important Bird Areas as a case study

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2013

• Venue

  Biological Conservation

• Publication date

  2013-11-01

• Fields of study

  Environmental Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2013.08.031
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Essential Biodiversity Variables

  2013cited by this paper
• Protection Reduces Loss of Natural Land-Cover at Sites of Conservation Importance across Africa

  2013cited by this paper
• Open-source mapping and services for Web-based land-cover validation

  2013cited by this paper
• The ‘why’, ‘what’ and ‘how’ of monitoring for conservation

  2013cited by this paper
• Protecting Important Sites for Biodiversity Contributes to Meeting Global Conservation Targets

  2012cited by this paper
• Identifying Priority Areas for Conservation: A Global Assessment for Forest-Dependent Birds

  2011cited by this paper
• Quantification of global gross forest cover loss

  2010cited by this paper
• Global Biodiversity: Indicators of Recent Declines

  2010cited by this paper
• Tracking trends in key sites for biodiversity: a case study using Important Bird Areas in Kenya

  2010cited by this paper
• High and Far: Biases in the Location of Protected Areas

  2009cited by this paper
• An assessment of land cover and threats in Important Bird Areas in Africa

  2009cited by this paper
• Measuring the effectiveness of protected area networks in reducing deforestation

  2008cited by this paper
• Using remote sensing to inform conservation status assessment: Estimates of recent deforestation rates on New Britain and the impacts upon endemic birds

  2008cited by this paper
• A Standard Lexicon for Biodiversity Conservation: Unified Classifications of Threats and Actions

  2008cited by this paper
• The Tropical Biodiversity Data Gap: Addressing Disparity in Global Monitoring

  2008cited by this paper
• Estimates of reserve effectiveness are confounded by leakage.

  2008cited by this paper
• Land-Use Allocation Protects the Peruvian Amazon

  2007cited by this paper
• Determination of Deforestation Rates of the World's Humid Tropical Forests

  2002cited by this paper
• GLIM for Ecologists

  1994cited by this paper

• Accuracy of pixel-based classification: application of different algorithms to landscapes of Western Iran

  2023cites this paper
• Guidelines for planning and monitoring corporate biodiversity performance

  2021cites this paper
• Mapping the spatial distribution of tree species selected by elephants (Loxodonta africana) in Venetia-Limpopo Nature Reserve using Sentinel-2 imagery

  2021cites this paper
• Repeatable and standardised monitoring of threats to Key Biodiversity Areas in Africa using Google Earth Engine

  2020cites this paper
• A SYNOPSIS OF FIELD AND REMOTE SENSING BASED METHODS FOR STUDYING AFRICAN ELEPHANT ( LOXODONTA AFRICANA ) IMPACT ON WOODY VEGETATION IN AFRICA

  2019cites this paper
• Do Big Unstructured Biodiversity Data Mean More Knowledge?

  2019cites this paper
• The prevalence, characteristics and effectiveness of Aichi Target 11′s “other effective area‐based conservation measures” (OECMs) in Key Biodiversity Areas

  2019cites this paper
• Integrating Remote Sensing into Wildlife Monitoring for Conservation

  2019cites this paper
• The Local Impacts of World Bank Development Projects Near Sites of Conservation Significance

  2018cites this paper
• Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBAs): the development and characteristics of a global inventory of key sites for biodiversity

  2018cites this paper
• The local impacts of World Bank development projects near sites of conservation significance.

  2018cites this paper
• Priorities for big biodiversity data

  2017cites this paper
• Complex species distribution models of Goldcrests and Firecrests densities in Poland: are remote sensing-based predictors sufficient?

  2015cites this paper
• Drivers of extinction risk in African mammals: the interplay of distribution state, human pressure, conservation response and species biology

  2014cites this paper