Attentive tracking shifts the perceived location of a nearby flash.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2005

• Venue

  Vision Research

• Publication date

  2005-11-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Physics, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/J.VISRES.2005.05.029PMID 16039690
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• The motion-induced position shift depends on the perceived direction of bistable quartet motion.

  2004influential reference
• Microstimulation of the frontal eye field and its effects on covert spatial attention.

  2004cited by this paper
• Temporal dependence of local motion induced shifts in perceived position.

  2004influential reference
• Perceived Shifts of Flashed Stimuli by Visible and Invisible Object Motion

  2003influential reference
• Review Visuomotor Origins of Covert Spatial Attention

  2003cited by this paper
• Visuomotor origins of covert spatial attention.

  2003cited by this paper
• Through the eye, slowly; Delays and localization errors in the visual system

  2002cited by this paper
• Smooth shifts of visual attention.

  2002cited by this paper
• Shifts in perceived position of flashed stimuli by illusory object motion.

  2002cited by this paper
• The influence of visual motion on perceived position.

  2002cited by this paper
• Neural delays, visual motion and the flash-lag effect.

  2002cited by this paper
• Eye movements modulate visual receptive fields of V4 neurons.

  2001cited by this paper
• Control of eye movements and spatial attention.

  2001cited by this paper
• Neuronal latencies and the position of moving objects.

  2001cited by this paper
• Sensorimotor integration compensates for visual localization errors during smooth pursuit eye movements.

  2001cited by this paper
• Changes in visual perception at the time of saccades.

  2001cited by this paper
• Limits of attentive tracking reveal temporal properties of attention.

  2000cited by this paper
• Postsaccadic visual references generate presaccadic compression of space

  2000cited by this paper
• Motion distorts visual space: shifting the perceived position of remote stationary objects

  2000cited by this paper
• A common network of functional areas for attention and eye movements.

  1998cited by this paper
• Cortical fMRI activation produced by attentive tracking of moving targets.

  1998cited by this paper
• Immediate post-saccadic information mediates space constancy.

  1998cited by this paper
• Perceived geometrical relationships affected by eye-movement signals

  1997cited by this paper
• Focused attention distorts visual space: an attentional repulsion effect.

  1997influential reference
• Compression of visual space before saccades

  1997cited by this paper
• Spatial Attention Effects in Macaque Area V4

  1997cited by this paper
• Postsaccadic target blanking prevents saccadic suppression of image displacement.

  1996cited by this paper
• Shared neural control of attentional shifts and eye movements

  1996cited by this paper
• The role of attention in the programming of saccades.

  1995cited by this paper
• The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements

  1995cited by this paper
• The functional architecture of human visual motion perception.

  1995cited by this paper
• Motion extrapolation in catching

  1994cited by this paper
• Attention and apparent motion.

  1994cited by this paper
• Attention-based motion perception.

  1992influential reference
• The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements.

  1992cited by this paper
• Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex.

  1991cited by this paper
• Vernier acuity with stationary moving Gabors.

  1991cited by this paper
• Illusory Displacement of Equiluminous Kinetic Edges

  1990cited by this paper
• Motion: the long and short of it.

  1989cited by this paper
• Perceptual latencies are shorter for motion towards the fovea than for motion away.

  1988influential reference
• Equiluminance: spatial and temporal factors and the contribution of blue-sensitive cones.

  1987cited by this paper
• Shared attentional control of smooth eye movement and perception.

  1986cited by this paper
• The perception of apparent motion.

  1986cited by this paper
• Retinal location and visual localization during pursuit eye movement.

  1982cited by this paper
• The perception of apparent movement.

  1980cited by this paper
• Low-level and high-level processes in apparent motion.

  1980cited by this paper
• Handbook of Sensory Physiology

  1975cited by this paper
• Foundations of Cyclopean Perception

  1972cited by this paper
• Eye Movements and Perceived Visual Direction

  1972cited by this paper
• Vision Research

  1961cited by this paper
• Perception of Apparent Motion.

  1960cited by this paper
• Über die Messung der Empfindungszeit

  1924cited by this paper

• Endogenous shifts of attention cause distortions in the perception of space: Reviewing and examining the attentional repulsion effect

  2020cites this paper
• Hallucination of moving objects revealed by a dynamic noise background

  2020cites this paper
• Oppel-Kundt illusion balance.

  2019cites this paper
• Dynamic Displacement Vector Interacts with Tactile Localization

  2019cites this paper
• Motion Perception

  2017cites this paper
• The flash-lag effect and the flash-drag effect in the same display.

  2016cites this paper
• Predicting bias in perceived position using attention field models.

  2016cites this paper
• When brain damage "improves" perception: neglect patients can localize motion-shifted probes better than controls.

  2015cites this paper
• Backward position shift in apparent motion.

  2014cites this paper
• Illusory Motion and Mislocalization of Temporally Offset Target in Apparent Motion Display

  2013cites this paper
• Attentional and Neural Manipulations of Visuospatial Contextual Information

  2013cites this paper
• Adaptation to a spatial offset occurs independently of the flash-drag effect.

  2013cites this paper
• The flash grab effect.

  2012cites this paper
• Voluntary attention modulates motion-induced mislocalization.

  2011cites this paper
• The motion-induced shift in the perceived location of a grating also shifts its aftereffect.

  2011cites this paper
• Selective Attention Warps Spatial Representation

  2011cites this paper
• Advancement of motion psychophysics: review 2001-2010.

  2011cites this paper
• A flash-drag effect in random motion reveals involvement of preattentive motion processing.

  2011cites this paper
• Attention Can Retrospectively Distort Visual Space

  2011cites this paper
• Nonretinotopic processing is related to postdictive size modulation in apparent motion

  2011cites this paper
• The visual attractor illusion.

  2010cites this paper
• Mislocalization of a target toward subjective contours: attentional modulation of location signals

  2008cites this paper
• Attentional modulation of receptive field structure in area 7a of the behaving monkey.

  2007cites this paper
• A motion-dependent distortion of retinotopy in area V4.

  2006cites this paper
• Bi-directional illusory position shifts toward the end point of apparent motion.

  2006cites this paper