Comparing Two Ground-Cover Measurement Methodologies for Semiarid Rangelands

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2013

• Venue

  Unknown venue

• Publication date

  2013-01-24

• Fields of study

  Environmental Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.2111/REM-D-11-00135.1
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Comparison of Point Intercept and Image Analysis for Monitoring Rangeland Transects

  2011cited by this paper
• Aerial Assessment of Leafy Spurge (Euphorbia esula L.): on Idaho’s Deep Fire Burn

  2010cited by this paper
• Agreement Between Measurements of Shrub Cover Using Ground-Based Methods and Very Large Scale Aerial Imagery

  2009cited by this paper
• Dual-camera, high-resolution aerial assessment of pipeline revegetation

  2009cited by this paper
• Characterizing rangeland vegetation using Landsat and 1-mm VLSA data in central Wyoming (USA)

  2008cited by this paper
• Effect of coregistration error on patchy target detection using high-resolution imagery

  2008cited by this paper
• Riparian monitoring using 2-cm GSD aerial photography

  2007cited by this paper
• Large-scale Aerial Images Capture Details of Invasive Plant Populations

  2007cited by this paper
• Characterizing the landscape dynamics of an invasive plant and risk of invasion using remote sensing.

  2006cited by this paper
• Precision Measurements from Very-Large Scale Aerial Digital Imagery

  2006cited by this paper
• Quantification Error Versus Location Error in Comparison of Categorical Maps

  2006cited by this paper
• Challenges of Integrating Geospatial Technologies Into Rangeland Research and Management

  2006cited by this paper
• The Accuracy of Ground-Cover Measurements

  2006influential reference
• A review of remote sensing of invasive weeds and example of the early detection of spotted knapweed (Centaurea maculosa) and babysbreath (Gypsophila paniculata) with a hyperspectral sensor

  2005cited by this paper
• Evaluating remotely sensed techniques for mapping riparian vegetation

  2002cited by this paper
• QUANTIFICATION ERROR VERSUS LOCATION ERROR IN COMPARISON OF CATEGORICAL MAPS

  2000cited by this paper
• The Western Range Revisited: Removing Livestock from Public Lands to Conserve Native Biodiversity

  1999cited by this paper
• Mapping leafy spurge (euphorbia esula) infestations using aerial photography and geographic information systems

  1996cited by this paper
• Using Spatial Information Technologies to Map Chinese Tamarisk (Tamarix chinensis) Infestations

  1996cited by this paper
• Assessing the Power of the Point-Line Transect to Monitor Changes in Plant Basal Cover

  1995cited by this paper
• Use of Remote Sensing for Detecting and Mapping Leafy Spurge (Euphorbia esula)

  1995cited by this paper
• Comparison of field methods in vegetation monitoring

  1995cited by this paper
• A COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS FOR ESTIMATING PLANT COVER

  1987cited by this paper
• Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

  1986cited by this paper
• What is Range Management

  1955cited by this paper

• Measuring nested frequency of plants from digital images with SampleFreq

  2021cites this paper
• Ground Cover—What Are the Critical Criteria and Why Does It Matter?

  2020cites this paper
• Method for estimating leaf coverage in strawberry plants using digital image processing

  2016cites this paper
• Investigation of remote sensing for dike inspection

  2016cites this paper
• Resource Management in Rangeland

  2015cites this paper
• Art to Science: Tools for Greater Objectivity in Resource Monitoring

  2011cites this paper