Mother knows best: developing a consumer led, evidence informed, research agenda for maternity care.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2013

• Venue

  Midwifery

• Publication date

  2013-06-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Sociology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/j.midw.2012.06.015PMID 22877764
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Evidence based midwifery

  2013cited by this paper
• Democratizing clinical research

  2011cited by this paper
• The James Lind Alliance: Tackling Treatment Uncertainties Together

  2010cited by this paper
• The James Lind Alliance: tackling research mismatches.

  2010cited by this paper
• Delphi method and nominal group technique in family planning and reproductive health research

  2006cited by this paper
• Is society losing control of the medical research agenda?

  2006cited by this paper
• Evaluation of a 'virtual' approach to commissioning health research

  2006cited by this paper
• Women's views of hospital and community-based postnatal care: the good, the bad and the indifferent

  2005cited by this paper
• Consumer involvement in research is essential

  2000cited by this paper
• What do I want from health research and researchers when I am a patient?

  1995cited by this paper
• Handbook of Qualitative Research

  1994cited by this paper

• Challenges and opportunities of sustained public involvement in maternal health research: a practice case study with reflections from researchers and public contributors

  2024cites this paper
• Cervical ripening at home or in hospital during induction of labour: the CHOICE prospective cohort study, process evaluation and economic analysis.

  2024cites this paper
• Partnering with consumers and practising clinicians to establish research priorities for public hospital maternity services.

  2024cites this paper
• Inducing labour in the United Kingdom: A feminist critical discourse analysis of policy and guidance

  2022cites this paper
• Effective communication: Core to promoting respectful maternity care for disabled women.

  2022cites this paper
• Research priorities for maternal and perinatal health clinical trials and methods used to identify them: A systematic review.

  2022cites this paper
• The maternal health-related issues that matter most to women in Ireland as they transition to motherhood - A qualitative study.

  2021cites this paper
• Cervical ripening at home or in-hospital—prospective cohort study and process evaluation (CHOICE) study: a protocol

  2021cites this paper
• Priorities

  2020cites this paper
• Process lessons from evaluating a combined continuity of carer and home birth scheme.

  2020cites this paper
• Wait and transfer, curate and prosume: Women's social experiences of birth spaces architecture.

  2020cites this paper
• Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial

  2019cites this paper
• Towards a new architectural understanding of birth spaces grounded in women's experiences of giving birth

  2018cites this paper
• A focus group study of women’s views and experiences of maternity care as delivered collaboratively by midwives and health visitors in England

  2018cites this paper
• Chapter 1 Patient-Centred Care in Maternity Services

  2018cites this paper
• Space for human connection in antenatal education: Uncovering women's hopes using Participatory Action Research.

  2017cites this paper
• Antenatal care trial interventions: a systematic scoping review and taxonomy development of care models

  2017cites this paper
• Ergebnisse : Es ließen sich acht detailreiche Forschungsthemen identi-fizieren , die jeweils unterschiedliche

  2017cites this paper
• Involving seldom-heard groups in a PPI process to inform the design of a proposed trial on the use of probiotics to prevent preterm birth: a case study

  2017cites this paper
• Powerless responsibility : women's experiences of caring for their late preterm baby/babies

  2017cites this paper
• Patient-Centred Care in Maternity Services

  2017cites this paper
• Involvement of persons with lived experience of a prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defect: an explorative study to gain insights into perspectives on future research

  2016cites this paper
• Women's preferences and knowledge about the legal competences of midwives in Brussels, Belgium. A descriptive observational study.

  2016cites this paper
• Nocebo and the potential harm of 'high risk' labelling: a scoping review.

  2015cites this paper
• Squaring the circle: a priority-setting method for evidence-based service development, reconciling research with multiple stakeholder views

  2015cites this paper
• Research Priorities in CKD: Report of a National Workshop Conducted in Australia.

  2015cites this paper
• Reflection on the Development of a Research Agenda in Rural Health

  2015cites this paper
• Missed opportunities for impact in patient and carer involvement: a mixed methods case study of research priority setting

  2015cites this paper
• A Methodological and Scientific Approach to Developing a Research Agenda in Education

  2014cites this paper
• Author's response to reviews Title:Squaring the circle: a priority-setting method for evidence-based service development, reconciling research with multiple stakeholder views Authors:

  2014cites this paper
• 'You've got it within you': the political act of keeping a wellness focus in the antenatal time.

  2014cites this paper
• Making childbirth risky: an unintended consequence of the normal birth agenda?

  2013cites this paper
• Accounts of Mothers’ Experiences of ‘Advice’ During Pregnancy and Early Motherhood

  2013cites this paper
• Involving consumers and the community in the development of a diagnostic instrument for fetal alcohol spectrum disorders in Australia

  2013cites this paper