Past research indicates that in political debates the same arguments are judged very differently depending on the perceiver’s own position on the issue, because positions on controversial issues are often tied to collective identities. In this article, we test the assumption that equality-based respect from an opposing opinion-based group can reduce such biases. Results confirmed that identification as an opponent or proponent of a contested issue was negatively related to evaluations of outgroup arguments (Study 1) and that this negative link was no longer significant when intergroup respect was experimentally induced (Study 2). Results support the notion that disagreements over political issues are intergroup conflicts, in which different socio-political groups struggle for recognition, and that approaches that protect collective identities and improve intergroup relations should be employed to de-escalate them.
Respect and political disagreement: Can intergroup respect reduce the biased evaluation of outgroup arguments?
Published 2019 in PLoS ONE
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2019
- Venue
PLoS ONE
- Publication date
2019-03-26
- Fields of study
Medicine, Political Science, Psychology
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-43 of 43 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-19 of 19 citing papers · Page 1 of 1