Physician perspectives on the importance of facts men ought to know about prostate-specific antigen testing

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2003

• Venue

  Journal of general internal medicine

• Publication date

  2003-05-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20626.xPMID 12795733PMCID PMC1494865
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Screening by the prostate-specific antigen test: what do the patients know?

  2009cited by this paper
• Health Decision Aids To Facilitate Shared Decision Making in Office Practice

  2002cited by this paper
• Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy.

  2002cited by this paper
• Introduction to AAFP Summary of Recommendations for Periodic Health Examinations. American Academy of Family Physicians.

  2002cited by this paper
• Prostate Cancer Screening

  2001cited by this paper
• Physician-patient discussions of controversial cancer screening tests.

  2001cited by this paper
• Factors influencing use of the prostate-specific antigen screening test in primary care.

  2000cited by this paper
• Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) best practice policy. American Urological Association (AUA).

  2000cited by this paper
• Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics.

  1999cited by this paper
• Screening for prostate cancer with the prostate-specific antigen test: are patients making informed decisions?

  1999cited by this paper
• SCREENING FOR PROSTATE CANCER

  1999cited by this paper
• The European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC): An Update

  1999cited by this paper
• Informed consent for PSA screening: does it happen?

  1999cited by this paper
• What should men know about prostate-specific antigen screening before giving informed consent?

  1998cited by this paper
• Prostate cancer screening and beliefs about treatment efficacy: a national survey of primary care physicians and urologists.

  1998cited by this paper
• Prostate Cancer Screening—A Physician Survey in Missouri

  1998cited by this paper
• CLINICAL GUIDELINE: PART 1: Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: Part I

  1997cited by this paper
• Early detection of prostate cancer. Part I: Prior probability and effectiveness of tests. The American College of Physicians.

  1997cited by this paper
• Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals.

  1997cited by this paper
• Early detection of prostate cancer. Part II: Estimating the risks, benefits, and costs. American College of Physicians.

  1997cited by this paper
• Screening for prostate cancer. American College of Physicians.

  1997cited by this paper
• CLINICAL GUIDELINES: PART II: Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: Part II

  1997cited by this paper
• Attitudes and practices of primary care physicians for prostate cancer screening.

  1996cited by this paper
• Screening for prostate cancer: a comparison of urologists and primary care physicians.

  1996cited by this paper
• Knowledge, beliefs, and prior screening behavior among blacks and whites reporting for prostate cancer screening.

  1995cited by this paper
• Prostate cancer screening. What family physicians believe is best.

  1995cited by this paper
• Screening for prostate cancer with prostate-specific antigen. An examination of the evidence.

  1995cited by this paper
• The National Cancer Institute Multi-Screening Trial.

  1994cited by this paper
• Public awareness of prostate cancer and the prostate-specific antigen test.

  1994cited by this paper
• Prostate cancer screening in the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian cancer screening trial of the National Cancer Institute.

  1994cited by this paper
• Public awareness of prostate cancer and the prostate-specific antigen test.

  1994cited by this paper
• The European Screening Study for Prostate Cancer.

  1994cited by this paper
• The European Screening Study for Prostate Cancer.

  1994cited by this paper
• Guide to clinical preventive services: a challenge to physician resourcefulness

  1993cited by this paper
• Principles of biomedical ethics

  1991cited by this paper
• Informed consent in theory and practice: Legal and medical perspectives on the informed consent doctrine and a proposed reconceptualization

  1989cited by this paper
• Risk of right bundle-branch block and complete heart block during pulmonary artery catheterization.

  1989cited by this paper
• (Almost) everything you ever wanted to know about informed consent. [Review of: Faden, RR and Beauchamp, TL. A history and theory of informed concsent. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986].

  1987cited by this paper
• A History and Theory of Informed Consent

  1986cited by this paper
• The Silent World of Doctor and Patient

  1984cited by this paper

• Do health professionals know about overdiagnosis in screening, and how are they dealing with it? A mixed-methods systematic scoping review

  2025cites this paper
• Delivering the unexpected—Information needs for PSA screening from Men's perspective: A qualitative study

  2021cites this paper
• Patient–Provider Communication About Prostate Cancer Screening and Treatment

  2017cites this paper
• Health literacy–listening skill and patient questions following cancer prevention and screening discussions

  2015cites this paper
• In the Era of Shared Decision Making, How Would An Iranian Urologist Screen Himself For Prostate Cancer?

  2015cites this paper
• Practice Prostate Cancer Screening Decision Making Under Controversy: Implications for Health Promotion

  2013cites this paper
• Physicians' attitudes about shared decision making for prostate cancer screening.

  2011cites this paper
• Effects of a Web-Based Decision Aid on African American Men's Prostate Screening Knowledge and Behavior

  2011influential citation
• Patient-Centered Discussions About Prostate Cancer Screening: A Real-World Approach

  2010cites this paper
• A structured implicit abstraction method to evaluate whether content of counseling before prostate cancer screening is consistent with recommendations by experts.

  2009cites this paper
• Barrett's oesophagus, part 2: Enabling informed patient choice in surveillance

  2009cites this paper
• The relationship between prostate cancer knowledge and beliefs and intentions to attend PSA screening among at-risk men.

  2009cites this paper
• Reported cancer screening practices of nephrologists: results from a national survey.

  2009cites this paper
• Screening in the Dark: Ethical Considerations of Providing Screening Tests to Individuals When Evidence is Insufficient to Support Screening Populations

  2009cites this paper
• Prostate cancer screening: the continuing controversy.

  2008cites this paper
• Family physicians’ perceptions, beliefs, and attitudes regarding information sharing with prostate cancer patients throughout the course of the disease

  2008cites this paper
• Reactions of Potential Jurors to a Hypothetical Malpractice Suit Alleging Failure to Perform a Prostate-Specific Antigen Test

  2008cites this paper
• Uncertainty in breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer: implications for supportive care.

  2008cites this paper
• American Family Physician

  2008cites this paper
• Health Technology Assessment : l'antigène prostatique spécifique (PSA) dans le dépistage du cancer de la prostate

  2006cites this paper
• Patient Decision Making

  2006cites this paper
• Brief report: Physicians and their personal prostate cancer-screening practices with prostate-specific antigen

  2006cites this paper
• Prostate Cancer Screening Decision Making Under Controversy: Implications for Health Promotion Practice

  2006cites this paper
• Physician-patient discussions about prostate-specific antigen test use among African-American men.

  2006cites this paper
• Factors associated with men's use of prostate-specific antigen screening: evidence from Health Information National Trends Survey.

  2005cites this paper
• Promoting an ethical approach to unproven screening imaging tests.

  2005cites this paper
• Prostate and colon cancer screening messages in popular magazines

  2004cites this paper
• The future of research that promotes cancer screening

  2004cites this paper
• Virtual physicians, health systems, and the healing relationship

  2003cites this paper
• Patient-provider communication in cancer screening

  2003cites this paper