Analysis and Extension of the Evidential Reasoning Algorithm for Multiple Attribute Decision Analysis with Uncertainty

In multiple attribute decision analysis (MADA) problems, one often needs to deal with assessment information with uncertainty. The evidential reasoning approach is one of the most effective methods to deal with such MADA problems. As kernel of the evidential reasoning approach, an original evidential reasoning (ER) algorithm was firstly proposed by Yang et al, and later they modified the ER algorithm in order to satisfy the proposed four synthesis axioms with which a rational aggregation process needs to satisfy. However, up to present, the essential difference of the two ER algorithms as well as the rationality of the synthesis axioms are still unclear. In this paper, we analyze the ER algorithms in Dempster-Shafer theory (DST) framework and prove that the original ER algorithm follows the reliability discounting and combination scheme, while the modified one follows the importance discounting and combination scheme. Further we reveal that the four synthesis axioms are not valid criteria to check the rationality of one attribute aggregation algorithm. Based on these new findings, an extended ER algorithm is proposed to take into account both the reliability and importance of different attributes, which provides a more general attribute aggregation scheme for MADA with uncertainty. A motorcycle performance assessment problem is examined to illustrate the proposed algorithm.

• Publication year

  2019

• Venue

  arXiv.org

• Publication date

  2019-03-28

• Fields of study

  Mathematics, Computer Science

• Identifiers
  arXiv 1903.11857
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• A Mathematical Theory of Evidence

  2020influential reference
• Managing Multigranular Linguistic Distribution Assessments in Large-Scale Multiattribute Group Decision Making

  2017cited by this paper
• A New BRB-ER-Based Model for Assessing the Lives of Products Using Both Failure Data and Expert Knowledge

  2016cited by this paper
• A New Method for Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multiattribute Decision Making

  2016cited by this paper
• A New Consensus Model for Group Decision Making Problems With Non-Homogeneous Experts

  2014cited by this paper
• Combining sources of evidence with reliability and importance for decision making

  2014influential reference
• Decision-Making in Energy Systems With Multiple Technologies and Uncertain Preferences

  2014cited by this paper
• Integrating textual analysis and evidential reasoning for decision making in Engineering design

  2013cited by this paper
• An introduction and survey of the evidential reasoning approach for multiple criteria decision analysis

  2012cited by this paper
• An empirical test of the evidential reasoning approach's synthesis axioms

  2012cited by this paper
• Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in Group Decision Making and its Optimization With an Allocation of Information Granularity

  2011cited by this paper
• Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process

  2011cited by this paper
• A model of intelligent building energy management for the indoor environment

  2010cited by this paper
• Fusion of sources of evidence with different importances and reliabilities

  2010cited by this paper
• System reliability prediction model based on evidential reasoning algorithm with nonlinear optimization

  2010cited by this paper
• An Evidential-Reasoning-Interval-Based Method for New Product Design Assessment

  2009cited by this paper
• Evidential Reasoning Approach for Multiattribute Decision Analysis Under Both Fuzzy and Interval Uncertainty

  2009cited by this paper
• A decision-support framework for agile enterprise partnering

  2009cited by this paper
• Refined modeling of sensor reliability in the belief function framework using contextual discounting

  2008cited by this paper
• Dealing with heterogeneous information in engineering evaluation processes

  2007cited by this paper
• The evidential reasoning approach for MADA under both probabilistic and fuzzy uncertainties

  2006cited by this paper
• Multiple-attribute decision making under uncertainty: the evidential reasoning approach revisited

  2006cited by this paper
• Environmental impact assessment using the evidential reasoning approach

  2006cited by this paper
• Assessing sensor reliability for multisensor data fusion within the transferable belief model

  2004cited by this paper
• A note on the subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights

  2004cited by this paper
• On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty

  2002cited by this paper
• Nonlinear information aggregation via evidential reasoning in multiattribute decision analysis under uncertainty

  2002cited by this paper
• Weight approximations in multi-attribute decision models

  2002cited by this paper
• Applying Evidential Reasoning to Prequalifying Construction Contractors

  2002cited by this paper
• Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multiattribute decision analysis under uncertainties

  2001cited by this paper
• A Subjective Safety-based Decision-making Approach for Evaluation of Safety Requirements Specifications in Software Development

  2001cited by this paper
• Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis

  2001cited by this paper
• An Evidential Reasoning Approach for Multiple-Attribute Decision Making with Uncertainty

  1994influential reference
• Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications

  1992influential reference
• The Transferable Belief Model

  1991cited by this paper
• The Analytic Hierarchy Process

  1985cited by this paper
• Methods and applications of interval analysis

  1979cited by this paper
• Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued Mapping

  1967cited by this paper

• A Methodology for Automating Assurance Case Generation

  2020cites this paper