This commentary responds to the review conducted by Király et al. (2018). The review enlightens and is useful in view of the limited studies on problematic use of video games and related control policies. It is argued that when considering regulation policies on video games, reference should be made to the arguments involved (A), basic research (B), conceptual models on problem video game use (C), documented lessons learning the broad field of addiction (D), and the need for rigorous evaluation (E). Besides “supply” reduction, it is vital to look at “demand” reduction in terms of how inner strengths may help to reduce the problematic use of video games.
The “ABCDE” of video gaming control: Arguments, basic research, conceptual models, documented lessons, and evaluation
Published 2019 in Journal of Behavioral Addictions
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2019
- Venue
Journal of Behavioral Addictions
- Publication date
2019-03-01
- Fields of study
Law, Medicine, Psychology
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-36 of 36 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-10 of 10 citing papers · Page 1 of 1