Intertemporal Evaluation Criteria for Climate Change Policy: The Basic Ethical Issues

The evaluation of long-term effects of climate change in cost-benefit analysis has a long tradition in environmental economics. Since the publication of the Stern Review in 2006 the debate about the "appropriate" discounting of future welfare and utility levels was revived and the most renowned scholars of the profession participated in this debate. But it seems that some contributions dealing with the Stern Review and the Review itself mixed up normative and positive issues to defend the own position. Furthermore, as we argue in this contribution, it also seems that the debate misses the heart of the problem. The aim of this work is to bring together economic and philosophical reasoning about justice and intergenerational equity in the context of climate change. So we adopt the normative view in order to present the most important ethical issues that, particularly in the context of climate policy, are most relevant for the choice of intertemporal welfare criteria. Subsequently we explore whether ethical considerations may also be helpful to determine the parameter values (or at least to delimit their range) which, after the choice of some type of intertemporal social welfare function, are needed to specify the concrete criterion that is employed to make decisions on climate policy.

• Publication year

  2011

• Venue

  Unknown venue

• Publication date

  2011-09-09

• Fields of study

  Philosophy, Economics, Environmental Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.2139/SSRN.1833395
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Justifying social discounting: The rank-discounted utilitarian approach

  2012cited by this paper
• The Ethics of Intertemporal Distribution in a Warming Planet

  2011cited by this paper
• The Restoration of Welfare Economics

  2011cited by this paper
• Discounting while treating generations equally

  2011cited by this paper
• The Social Evaluation of Intergenerational Policies and Its Application to Integrated Assessment Models of Climate Change

  2010cited by this paper
• Expected Net Present Value, Expected Net Future Value, and the Ramsey Rule

  2010cited by this paper
• On Analyzing the World Distribution of Income

  2010cited by this paper
• Designing Climate Mitigation Policy

  2010cited by this paper
• Intergenerational equity and an explicit construction of welfare criteria

  2010cited by this paper
• DISCOUNTING AND WELFARE ANALYSIS OVER TIME: CHOOSING THE η

  2010cited by this paper
• The Ethics of Distribution in a Warming Planet

  2009cited by this paper
• Intergenerational Equity

  2009cited by this paper
• Discounting for Climate Change

  2009influential reference
• The Ethics of Distribution in a Warming Planet

  2009cited by this paper
• Discounting the Long-Distant Future: A Simple Explanation for the Weitzman-Gollier-Puzzle

  2008cited by this paper
• Why Economic Analysis Supports Strong Action on Climate Change: A Response to the Stern Review's Critics

  2008cited by this paper
• Justice, political liberalism, and utilitarianism : themes from Harsanyi and Rawls

  2008cited by this paper
• Justice, political liberalism, and utilitarianism: Themes from Harsanyi and Rawls

  2008cited by this paper
• Fairness, responsibility, and welfare

  2008cited by this paper
• A Review of The Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change

  2007cited by this paper
• A Review of the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change

  2007cited by this paper
• The Economics of Climate Change

  2007cited by this paper
• AN AXIOMATIC APPROACH TO SUSTAINABILITY

  2006cited by this paper
• The Elasticity of Marginal Utility of Consumption: Estimates for 20 OECD Countries*

  2005cited by this paper
• Maximizing the expected net future value as an alternative strategy to gamma discounting

  2004influential reference
• Aggregating Infinite Utility Streams with InterGenerational Equity: The Impossibility of Being Paretian

  2003cited by this paper
• On the Measurement of Inequality

  2003cited by this paper
• The Malleability of Undiscounted Utilitarianism as a Criterion of Intergenerational Justice

  2003cited by this paper
• Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review

  2002cited by this paper
• Warming the World: Economic Models of Global Warming

  2000cited by this paper
• Why the Far-Distant Future Should Be Discounted at Its Lowest Possible Rate

  1998cited by this paper
• Discounting, Morality, and Gaming

  1996cited by this paper
• An axiomatic approach to sustainable development

  1996cited by this paper
• Intertemporal population ethics: critical-level utilitarian principles.

  1995cited by this paper
• A social discount rate for the United Kingdom

  1995cited by this paper
• Unjust intergenerational allocations

  1991cited by this paper
• Equity among Generations

  1980influential reference
• Economic Theory and Exhaustible Resources.

  1980cited by this paper
• Equity and the Informational Basis of Collective Choice

  1977cited by this paper
• Intergenerational Equity and Exhaustable Resources

  1973cited by this paper
• A Theory of Justice

  1971cited by this paper
• Capital and development planning

  1970cited by this paper
• Existence of Optimal Programs of Accumulation for an Infinite Time Horizon

  1965cited by this paper
• The Evaluation of Infinite Utility Streams

  1965cited by this paper
• Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility

  1955cited by this paper
• THE MATHEMATICAL THEORY OF SAVING

  1928cited by this paper
• The Methods of Ethics: A SUPPLEMENT TO THE FIRST EDITION OF THE METHODS OF ETHICS

  year unknowncited by this paper

• Intertemporal Distribution, Sufficiency, and the Social Cost of Carbon

  2018cites this paper
• Weighing the Costs and Benefits of Climate Change to Our Children

  2016cites this paper