Can science justify regulatory decisions about the cultivation of transgenic crops?

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2012

• Venue

  Transgenic research

• Publication date

  2012-04-05

• Fields of study

  Biology, Medicine, Philosophy, Environmental Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/s11248-012-9613-3PMID 22476694
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Policy-making: Scientists cannot compete as lobbyists

  2012cited by this paper
• Commercializing genetically modified crops under EU regulations: objectives and barriers.

  2012cited by this paper
• Underlying reasons of the controversy over adverse effects of Bt toxins on lady beetle and lacewing larvae

  2012cited by this paper
• Evaluating environmental risks of genetically modified crops: ecological harm criteria for regulatory decision-making

  2012cited by this paper
• Valuating environmental impacts of genetically modified crops

  2012cited by this paper
• The Innovation Union: a perfect means to confused ends?

  2012cited by this paper
• If you want to win the game, you must join in

  2011cited by this paper
• Measuring the Results of Science Investments

  2011cited by this paper
• Framing environmental sustainability challenges for research and innovation in European policy agendas

  2011cited by this paper
• Derivation and interpretation of hazard quotients to assess ecological risks from the cultivation of insect-resistant transgenic crops.

  2011cited by this paper
• Bt crops and food security in developing countries: realised benefits, sustainable use and lowering barriers to adoption

  2010cited by this paper
• Recommendations for the design of laboratory studies on non-target arthropods for risk assessment of genetically engineered plants

  2010cited by this paper
• GM plants: science, politics and EC regulations.

  2010cited by this paper
• Reducing uncertainty in regulatory decision-making for transgenic crops: More ecological research or clearer environmental risk assessment?

  2010cited by this paper
• A case of “pseudo science”? A study claiming effects of the Cry1Ab protein on larvae of the two-spotted ladybird is reminiscent of the case of the green lacewing

  2009cited by this paper
• Is the German suspension of MON810 maize cultivation scientifically justified?

  2009cited by this paper
• The Economics of Genetically Modified Crops

  2009cited by this paper
• Up in arms

  2009cited by this paper
• Transgenic Insecticidal Crops and Natural Enemies: A Detailed Review of Laboratory Studies

  2009cited by this paper
• Extrapolating non-target risk of Bt crops from laboratory to field

  2009cited by this paper
• Setting the record straight: a rebuttal to an erroneous analysis on transgenic insecticidal crops and natural enemies

  2009cited by this paper
• Science, Scientists, and Policy Advocacy

  2007cited by this paper
• Ecology, politics and policy

  2007cited by this paper
• The risk assessment-policy gap: an example from the UK contaminated land regime.

  2006cited by this paper
• Let Them Eat Precaution

  2005cited by this paper
• Ecology and government policies: the GM crop debate*

  2004cited by this paper
• How science makes environmental controversies worse

  2004cited by this paper
• „Ein Fall von...“

  2004cited by this paper
• Extrapolation in Ecological Risk Assessment: Balancing Pragmatism and Precaution in Chemical Controls Legislation

  2002cited by this paper
• Entering the Century of the Environment: A New Social Contract for Science

  1998cited by this paper
• A critical evaluation of safety (uncertainty) factors for ecological risk assessment

  1998cited by this paper
• Critical Rationalism: A Restatement and Defence

  1998cited by this paper
• A Critique for Ecology

  1991cited by this paper
• Conjectures and Refutations

  1963cited by this paper

• Integrated weed management systems with herbicide-tolerant crops in the European Union: lessons learnt from home and abroad

  2017cites this paper
• Are Limits of Concern a useful concept to improve the environmental risk assessment of GM plants?

  2017cites this paper
• Assessment of unanticipated unintended effects of genetically modified plants on non‐target organisms: a controversy worthy of pursuit?

  2016influential citation
• Advancing environmental risk assessment of regulated products under EFSA's remit

  2016cites this paper
• Molecular Characterization and Function Analysis of the Vitellogenin Receptor from the Cotton Bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae)

  2016cites this paper
• Guidance to develop specific protection goals options for environmental risk assessment at EFSA, in relation to biodiversity and ecosystem services

  2016cites this paper
• [Agricultural biotechnology safety assessment].

  2015cites this paper
• EFSA’s scientific activities and achievements on the risk assessment of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) during its first decade of existence: looking back and ahead

  2014cites this paper
• Post-release monitoring: the Brazilian system, its aims and requirements for information

  2014cites this paper
• EFSA Guidelines on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified animals in the EU: the process and risk assessment considerations

  2014cites this paper
• Tradeoff between reproduction and resistance evolution to Bt-toxin in Helicoverpa armigera: regulated by vitellogenin gene expression.

  2014cites this paper
• Gene Flow and Risk Assessment in Genetically Modified Crops

  2014cites this paper
• Safety Assessment of Food and Feed Derived from GM Crops: Using Problem Formulation to Ensure “Fit for Purpose” Risk Assessments

  2013cites this paper
• Genetically engineered trees for plantation forests: key considerations for environmental risk assessment

  2013cites this paper
• Crop to wild gene flow: Does more sophisticated research provide better risk assessment?

  2013cites this paper
• Towards a more open debate about values in decision-making on agricultural biotechnology

  2013cites this paper
• Managing Trade in Products of Biotechnology—Which Alternative to Choose: Science or Politics?

  2013cites this paper