Landcare in Australia and Germany: comparing structures and policies for community engagement in natural resource management

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2010

• Venue

  Ecological Management and Restoration

• Publication date

  2010-12-01

• Fields of study

  Political Science, Sociology, Environmental Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1111/J.1442-8903.2010.00548.X
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Landcare bowling alone: finding a future in the ‘fourth’ phase

  2009cited by this paper
• A Typology of Collaboration Efforts in Environmental Management

  2008cited by this paper
• Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making

  2008cited by this paper
• Organizing regionally for natural resource management in Australia: Reflections on agency and government

  2006cited by this paper
• Regionalisation of Environmental Management: a Case Study of the Natural Heritage Trust, South Australia

  2005cited by this paper
• Social principles for agricultural extension to assist in the promotion of natural resource management

  2004cited by this paper
• THE TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT: HOW DO TBL, EIA, SIA, SEA AND EMS RELATE TO EACH OTHER?

  2004cited by this paper
• Landcare and Livelihoods: The Promotion and Adoption of Conservation Farming Systems in the Philippine Uplands

  2003cited by this paper
• The Impacts of Deregulation and Agricultural Restructuring for Rural Australia

  2003cited by this paper
• Landcare and Catchment Management in Australia: Lessons for State-Sponsored Community Participation

  2000cited by this paper
• Community landcare, the National Landcare Program and the landcare movement: the social dimensions of landcare

  2000cited by this paper
• Agency–Community Partnership in Landcare: Lessons for State-Sponsored Citizen Resource Management

  1998cited by this paper
• The Basics Of Social Research

  1998cited by this paper
• Landcare in Australia: Does it Make a Difference?

  1996cited by this paper
• Beyond a ‘good thing’: political interests and the meaning of Landcare

  1995cited by this paper
• Landcare: Communities shaping the land and the future

  1994cited by this paper

• Soil-based carbon farming: Opportunities for collaboration

  2024cites this paper
• What role for environmental cooperatives in collective agri-environmental schemes?

  2023cites this paper
• A conceptual framework and research method for understanding protected area governance: varying approaches and epistemic worldviews about human-nature relations

  2022cites this paper
• Co-producing better land management? An ethnographic study of partnership working in the context of agricultural diffuse pollution

  2022cites this paper
• Facilitation of public Payments for Ecosystem Services through local intermediaries: An institutional analysis of agri‐environmental measure implementation in Germany

  2021cites this paper
• AGRICULTURE AND SCIENCE COLLABORATION: THE CASE OF ŁÓDŹ VOIVODESHIP (POLAND)

  2021cites this paper
• Looking at hidden connections to explore adaptive capacity of cultural landscape systems: case studies of four landcare associations in Germany

  2021cites this paper
• Governance challenges of small-scale gold mining in Ghana: Insights from a process net-map study

  2021cites this paper
• Policies for wetlands implementation in Denmark and Sweden – historical lessons and emerging issues

  2021cites this paper
• Governing Community-Based Natural Resource Management in Australia: International Implications

  2020cites this paper
• Social Capital in Community Organizing for Land Protection and Food Security

  2020cites this paper
• Livestock grazing effects on riparian bird breeding behaviour in agricultural landscapes

  2019cites this paper
• Learning together: a transdisciplinary approach to student–staff partnerships in higher education

  2019cites this paper
• Planning on a wider scale – Swedish forest owners' preferences for landscape policy attributes

  2019cites this paper
• Landowner Perceptions of Payments for Nature Conservation on Private Land

  2019cites this paper
• Planning On a Wider Scale – Swedish Forest Owners’ Preferences for Landscape Policy Attributes

  2019cites this paper
• The Natural Resource Management Planning Portal: Perspectives for NRM Planning and Reporting

  2019cites this paper
• Landscape Planning—Paving the Way for Effective Conservation of Forest Biodiversity and a Diverse Forestry?

  2018cites this paper
• Will farmers work together for conservation? The potential limits of farmers’ cooperation in agri-environment measures

  2018cites this paper
• Trust relationships and collaborative private land conservation program design: Experimental insights

  2018cites this paper
• Do financial incentives motivate conservation on private land?

  2018cites this paper
• Water matters: An assessment of opinion on water management and community engagement in the Republic of Ireland and the United Kingdom

  2017cites this paper
• The social and institutional aspects of industry-driven fruit fly area-wide management in Australian horticulture industries

  2017cites this paper
• Low-Input Technology: An Integrative View

  2017cites this paper
• Placing Science for Natural Resource Management and Climate Variability : Lessons from Narratives of Risk, Place and Identity

  2017cites this paper
• Integrated landscape initiatives in Europe: Multi-sector collaboration in multi-functional landscapes

  2016cites this paper
• Factors underlying farmers’ intentions to perform unsubsidised agri-environmental measures

  2016cites this paper
• Civil society actors at the nexus of the ecosystem services concept and agri-environmental policies

  2016cites this paper
• Adaptive co-management for collaborative commercial pest management: the case of industry-driven fruit fly area-wide management

  2016cites this paper
• How Local Intermediaries Improve the Effectiveness of Public Payment for Ecosystem Services Programs: The Role of Networks and Agri-Environmental Assistance

  2015influential citation
• Agri-environmental collaboratives for landscape management in Europe

  2015cites this paper
• Reducing the carbon footprint of red meat

  2015cites this paper
• A Place-Based Agriculture Development Framework

  2015cites this paper
• The Conservation Movement in Zimbabwe: An Early Experiment in Devolved Community Based Regulation

  2015cites this paper
• An analytical framework for assessing the potential of intermediaries to improve the performance of payments for ecosystem services

  2015cites this paper
• The Potential Application of Qualitative Evaluation Methods in European Regional Development: Reflections on the Use of Performance Story Reporting in Australian Natural Resource Management

  2015cites this paper
• Collective agri-environment schemes: How can regional environmental cooperatives enhance farmers’ intentions for agri-environment schemes?

  2015cites this paper
• Protecting the Environment, Privately

  2015cites this paper
• Agri-environmental collaboratives as bridging organisations in landscape management.

  2015cites this paper
• Improving the link between payments and the provision of ecosystem services in agri-environment schemes

  2014cites this paper
• Integrating agriculture and climate change mitigation at landscape scale: Implications from an Australian case study

  2014cites this paper
• The Case for Social Catchments: new methods for engaging local communities in natural resource management

  2014cites this paper
• Integration of the ecosystem sector and climate change mitigation in carbon accounting schemes : practical and policy approaches

  2014cites this paper
• The role of extension in building capacity and resilience in Australian rural industries

  2014cites this paper
• Recommendations arising from an analysis of changes to the Australian agricultural research, development and extension system

  2014cites this paper
• Collective Agri-environmental Strategies

  2014cites this paper
• Incentivising collaborative conservation: Lessons from existing environmental Stewardship Scheme options

  2013cites this paper
• The potential for collaborative agri-environment schemes in England: Can a well-designed collaborative approach address farmers’ concerns with current schemes?

  2012cites this paper
• WHAT DOES LANDSCAPE SCALE GOVERNANCE LOOK LIKE? SUPPORTING ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT IN LANDSCAPES WITH FRAGMENTED HABITAT AND OWNERSHIP

  2012influential citation
• Entre la propiedad agraria y la ambiental: El debate respecto a los derechos de propiedad de la tierra

  2012cites this paper
• The Many Turnings of Agricultural Extension in Australia

  2012cites this paper
• Nurturing Diversified Farming Systems in Industrialized Countries: How Public Policy Can Contribute

  2012cites this paper
• Social context and the role of collaborative policy making for private land conservation

  2012cites this paper
• The practice of conservation management in rural-amenity landscapes: a dwelt human-environment perspective

  2012cites this paper
• The intrinsic features of Environmental Management Systems that facilitate adoption and encourage innovation in primary industries.

  2012cites this paper
• Public participation in commercial environments: critical reflections on community engagement methods used in the Australian plantation forestry industry

  2012cites this paper
• Improving the theory and practice of community engagement in Australian forest management

  2011cites this paper
• Options for landscape scale collaboration under the UK's environmental stewardship scheme

  2011cites this paper
• The power of the research process : co-producing knowledge for sustainable upland estate management in Scotland

  2011cites this paper