An analysis of nanoscientists as public communicators.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2014

• Venue

  Nature Nanotechnology

• Publication date

  2014-10-01

• Fields of study

  Sociology, Medicine, Political Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1038/nnano.2014.194PMID 25218326
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Narratives of Science Outreach in Elite Contexts of Academic Science

  2014cited by this paper
• Organizational Influence on Scientists’ Efforts to Go Public

  2014cited by this paper
• Predicting scientists’ participation in public life

  2013cited by this paper
• Toward a Model of Scientists’ Public Communication Activity

  2013cited by this paper
• Gap between science and media revisited: Scientists as public communicators

  2013cited by this paper
• COMPASS: Navigating the Rules of Scientific Engagement

  2013cited by this paper
• How scientists view the public, the media and the political process

  2013cited by this paper
• The Emergence of Nano News: Tracking Thematic Trends and Changes in U.S. Newspaper Coverage of Nanotechnology

  2011cited by this paper
• The mobilization of scientists for public engagement

  2011cited by this paper
• Labeling of Nanotechnology Consumer Products Can Influence Risk and Benefit Perceptions

  2011cited by this paper
• The Influence of Presumed Media Influence on News About Science and Scientists

  2011cited by this paper
• A statistical picture of popularization activities and their evolutions in France

  2011cited by this paper
• Leading US nano-scientists’ perceptions about media coverage and the public communication of scientific research findings

  2011cited by this paper
• Applying a precautionary risk management strategy for regulation of nanotechnology

  2010cited by this paper
• Deliberating the risks of nanotechnologies for energy and health applications in the United States and United Kingdom.

  2009cited by this paper
• Of risks and regulations: how leading U.S. nanoscientists form policy stances about nanotechnology

  2009cited by this paper
• Socialization or Rewards? Predicting U.S. Scientist-Media Interactions

  2009cited by this paper
• Rhetorical gamesmanship in the nano debates over sunscreens and nanoparticles

  2008cited by this paper
• Interactions with the Mass Media

  2008cited by this paper
• Major Depressive Disorder and Suicide

  2008cited by this paper
• Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method

  2008cited by this paper
• Nano doesn't have a marketing problem… yet

  2007cited by this paper
• Scientists worry about some risks more than the public.

  2007cited by this paper
• Outreach Training Needed

  2007cited by this paper
• The Theory of Planned Behaviour

  2004cited by this paper
• Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology

  2001cited by this paper
• Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analytic review.

  2001cited by this paper
• Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior.

  1998cited by this paper
• The theory of planned behavior

  1991cited by this paper

• Predictors of media engagement: factors impacting materials scientists’ intentions to communicate science

  2025cites this paper
• University scientists’ willingness to participate in public engagement: A concept explication

  2025influential citation
• 探究科研工作者参与科学传播的动机、收获与影响因素:以广西科学院“科学日”为例

  2025cites this paper
• All the Science That Is Fit to Blog: An Analysis of Science Blogging Practices

  2023cites this paper
• Science journalism in pandemic times: perspectives on the science-media relationship from COVID-19 researchers in Southern Europe

  2023cites this paper
• Geoscientists' views about science communication: predicting willingness to communicate geoscience

  2023cites this paper
• A-34 | Utilization of Thrombolytics for STEMI During the COVID-19 Pandemic

  2023cites this paper
• How to restore trust in science through education

  2023cites this paper
• Beyond Cheerleading: Navigating the Boundaries of Science Journalism in South Africa

  2022cites this paper
• Perceived behavioral control as a moderator: Scientists’ attitude, norms, and willingness to engage the public

  2022influential citation
• Towards responsible science and technology: How nanotechnology research and development is shaping risk governance practices in Australia

  2022cites this paper
• Top Indian scientists as public communicators: a survey of their perceptions, attitudes and communication behaviors

  2022cites this paper
• Teaching scientists to communicate: developing science communication training based on scientists’ knowledge and self-reflectiveness

  2022cites this paper
• Understanding high-achieving publicly engaged scientists' commitment to engage: push, pull, and drag forces

  2022cites this paper
• How institutional factors at US land-grant universities impact scientists’ public scholarship

  2022cites this paper
• “One might tweet just for money”: Organisational and institutional incentives for researchers’ social media communication and public engagement practices

  2022cites this paper
• Lost opportunities for science communication in Spanish universities

  2021influential citation
• Effect of Context on Scientists’ Normative Beliefs

  2021cites this paper
• Exploring the intersections: researchers and communication professionals' perspectives on the organizational role of science communication

  2020cites this paper
• Scientists as public communicators: individual- and institutional-level motivations and barriers for public communication in Singapore

  2020influential citation
• Two-way translation: Advancing knowledge of politics and psychology via the study of bilingual voters

  2019cites this paper
• Scientific societies’ support for public engagement: an interview study

  2019cites this paper
• Engagement present and future: Graduate student and faculty perceptions of social media and the role of the public in science engagement

  2019cites this paper
• Public engagement by researchers of different disciplines in Singapore: A qualitative comparison of macro- and meso-level concerns

  2019cites this paper
• Public communication by climate scientists: what, with whom and why?

  2019cites this paper
• Factors influencing the public communication behaviour of publicly visible scientists in South Africa

  2018influential citation
• Scientists’ views about communication objectives

  2018cites this paper
• Microbiologists’ Public Engagement Views and Behaviors †

  2018cites this paper
• A comparison between scientists’ and communication scholars’ views about scientists’ public engagement activities

  2018influential citation
• Understanding Scientists’ Willingness to Engage

  2018influential citation
• Models of Public Engagement: Nanoscientists’ Understandings of Science–Society Interactions

  2018cites this paper
• Bustling public communication by astronomers around the world driven by personal and contextual factors

  2018cites this paper
• Partizipative Hochschulkommunikation

  2018cites this paper
• Two-way communication between scientists and the public: a view from science communication trainers in North America

  2017cites this paper
• Engaging bioscientists in science communication: Evidence from an international survey

  2017cites this paper
• Perceptions and attitude effects on nanotechnology acceptance: an exploratory framework

  2017cites this paper
• Scientists’ Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement

  2016cites this paper
• Public science communication in Africa: views and practices of academics at the National University of Science and Technology in Zimbabwe

  2016cites this paper
• Qualitative Interviews With Science Communication Trainers About Communication Objectives and Goals

  2016cites this paper
• Researchers: share your passion for science!

  2016cites this paper
• Social spaces of research communication : investigating atmospheres in zones of trade

  2015cites this paper
• Scientists, the Media, and the Public Communication of Science

  2015cites this paper
• Public engagement: the benefits of communicating.

  2014cites this paper
• J C

  year unknowncites this paper