Problems involved in the cultivation of maize for fodder and ensilage. I. The choice of variety

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  1959

• Venue

  Journal of Agricultural Sciences

• Publication date

  1959-02-01

• Fields of study

  Agricultural and Food Sciences, Biology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1017/S0021859600035723
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• American hybrid maize for silage in the south of England Part II. Composition, nutritive value and losses in the silo

  1952cited by this paper
• American hybrid maize for silage in the south of England Part I. The yield and composition with special reference to plant population and nitrogenous fertilizer

  1951cited by this paper
• An assessment of the factors controlling the productivity of maize in England

  1951cited by this paper
• Rations for livestock.

  1948cited by this paper
• The influence of stage of growth of corn on the composition of silage.

  1937cited by this paper
• The Composition of Green Maize and of the Silage produced therefrom

  1908cited by this paper
• Ensilage

  year unknowncited by this paper

• Variety and weed management effects on organic chickpea stand establishment and seed yield

  2020cites this paper
• Using energy requirements to compare the suitability of alternative methods for broadcast and site-specific weed control

  2019cites this paper
• Shifting the Paradigm: An Ecological Systems Approach to Weed Management

  2019cites this paper
• Thermal Weed Control

  2017cites this paper
• Flame Weeding at Archaeological Sites of the Mediterranean Region

  2017cites this paper
• The effectiveness of flame weeding and cultivation on weed control, yield and yield components of organic soybean as influenced by manure application

  2015cites this paper
• Integrated Weed Management in Soybean

  2014cites this paper
• Growth Stage Affects Response of Selected Weed Species to Flaming

  2014cites this paper
• Integrated Weed Management in Horticultural Crops

  2014cites this paper
• Integrated Weed Management in Maize

  2014cites this paper
• Impact of single and repeated flaming on yield components and yield of maize

  2013cites this paper
• Flaming as an Alternative Weed Control Method for Conventional and Organic Agronomic Crop Production Systems: A Review

  2013cites this paper
• Weed control and crop tolerance to propane flaming as influenced by the time of day

  2012cites this paper
• Maize response to broadcast flaming at different growth stages: Effects on growth, yield and yield components

  2011cites this paper
• Growth Stage Influenced Sorghum Response to Broadcast Flaming: Effects on Yield and Its Components

  2011cites this paper
• Popcorn (Zea mays L. var. everta) yield and yield components as influenced by the timing of broadcast flaming

  2010cites this paper
• Growth Stage-Influenced Differential Response of Foxtail and Pigweed Species to Broadcast Flaming

  2010cites this paper
• Tolerance of selected weed species to broadcast flaming at different growth stages

  2010cites this paper
• Timing and propane dose of broadcast flaming to control weed population influenced yield of sweet maize (Zea mays L. var. rugosa)

  2010cites this paper
• Growth stage impacts tolerance of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to broadcast flaming.

  2010cites this paper
• Yield and yield components of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] are influenced by the timing of broadcast flaming

  2010cites this paper
• The growth of maize

  1978cites this paper
• The effect of diquat and paraquat used as desiccants on the moisture content of maize for silage.

  1970cites this paper
• INTAKE AND LIVEWEIGHT GAIN OF BEEF CATTLE FED ON MAIZE SILAGE AND DRIED PELLETED WHOLE‐CROP BEANS (VICIA FABA L.)

  1969cites this paper
• The Digestibility of Fodder Maize and Maize Silage

  1965cites this paper
• The cultivation of maize for fodder and ensilage Part II. The effect of changes in plant density

  1959cites this paper