Abstract To select efficient baits to attract fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae), the use of field cages represents a good compromise between laboratory and outdoor studies. Nevertheless, the methodological details of such experiments up to now have had little attention. To assess the influence of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on the efficiency of food attractants for Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett), a series of methodological experiments were conducted in field cages with McPhail traps. Baited traps should initially be randomly placed and furthermore regularly rotated to lower the influence of climatic conditions. During an experiment lasting 8 h, the presence of already captured flies did not influence the attractiveness of the traps. The presence of potted host plants in the field cage allowed for better dispersion of the flies and enhanced the discrimination potential of the experiment. Moreover, yellow traps should be painted black to limit visual bias. Finally, in the conditions of these experiments, the sex of tested flies and the diet given to them during rearing, with or without protein, had no influence on the qualitative results of choice experiments. However, these factors greatly influenced the total amount of captured flies: protein-deprived females were more responsive than all others. Furthermore, whether the tested flies were sexually mature had a significant influence on their responsiveness to protein baits. These results are discussed to establish recommendations for further field cages experiments.
Adjustment of Field Cage Methodology for Testing Food Attractants for Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae)
P. Rousse,P. Duyck,S. Quilici,P. Ryckewaert
Published 2005 in Unknown venue
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2005
- Venue
Unknown venue
- Publication date
2005-05-01
- Fields of study
Biology, Environmental Science
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
CONCEPTS
- already captured flies
Flies that had already been caught inside a trap during an ongoing test.
Aliases: previously captured flies
- field cage experiments
Enclosed semi-field tests used here to compare fruit fly attractants under controlled outdoor-like conditions.
Aliases: field cages
- fly sex and rearing diet
The sex of the test flies and whether their rearing diet contained protein.
Aliases: sex of tested flies and diet
- potted host plants
Live host plants placed in pots inside the field cage to modify fly movement and distribution.
Aliases: host plants in pots
- protein baits
Food attractants based on protein that were tested against the fruit flies.
Aliases: protein attractants
- sexual maturity
The reproductive maturity stage of the test flies at the time of testing.
Aliases: maturity stage
- visual bias
Influence on trap choice caused by trap appearance rather than the bait.
Aliases: visual influence
- yellow traps
Yellow-colored traps used as the visual lure in the cage tests.
Aliases: yellow-colored traps
REFERENCES
Showing 1-32 of 32 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-29 of 29 citing papers · Page 1 of 1