In this commentary, we argue that the term 'prediction' is overly used when in fact, referring to foundational writings of de Finetti, the correspondent term should be inference. In particular, we intend (i) to summarize and clarify relevant subject matter on prediction from established statistical theory, and (ii) point out the logic of this understanding with respect practical uses of the term prediction. Written from an interdisciplinary perspective, associating statistics and forensic science as an example, this discussion also connects to related fields such as medical diagnosis and other areas of application where reasoning based on scientific results is practiced in societal relevant contexts. This includes forensic psychology that uses prediction as part of its vocabulary when dealing with matters that arise in the course of legal proceedings.
Prediction in forensic science: a critical examination of common understandings
A. Biedermann,S. Bozza,F. Taroni
Published 2015 in Frontiers in Psychology
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2015
- Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
- Publication date
2015-06-02
- Fields of study
Law, Medicine, Psychology
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-21 of 21 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-4 of 4 citing papers · Page 1 of 1