Integrating telemetry data into spatial capture–recapture modifies inferences on multi‐scale resource selection

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2018

• Venue

  Ecosphere

• Publication date

  2018-04-01

• Fields of study

  Biology, Environmental Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1002/ECS2.2203
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Data integration for inference about spatial processes: A model-based approach to test and account for data inconsistency

  2017cited by this paper
• Spatial ecology and resource selection of a high-elevation American marten (Martes americana) population in the northeastern United States

  2016cited by this paper
• Identification and Density Estimation of American Martens (Martes americana) Using a Novel Camera-Trap Method

  2016cited by this paper
• Habitat associations in a recolonizing, low‐density black bear population

  2016cited by this paper
• State-space models’ dirty little secrets: even simple linear Gaussian models can have estimation problems

  2015cited by this paper
• Linking resource selection and mortality modeling for population estimation of mountain lions in Montana

  2015cited by this paper
• Integrating resource selection into spatial capture-recapture models for large carnivores

  2015cited by this paper
• Likelihood analysis of spatial capture-recapture models for stratified or class structured populations

  2015cited by this paper
• Statistical ecology comes of age

  2014cited by this paper
• Estimating population size in the presence of temporary migration using a joint analysis of telemetry and capture–recapture data

  2014cited by this paper
• Spatially explicit integrated population models

  2014cited by this paper
• Using multiple data sources provides density estimates for endangered Florida panther

  2013cited by this paper
• Strategies for fitting nonlinear ecological models in R, AD Model Builder, and BUGS

  2013cited by this paper
• Estimating population size by spatially explicit capture–recapture

  2013cited by this paper
• A spatial mark--resight model augmented with telemetry data.

  2013cited by this paper
• Marten space use and habitat selection in managed coniferous boreal forests of eastern Canada

  2013cited by this paper
• Using auxiliary telemetry information to estimate animal density from capture–recapture data

  2013cited by this paper
• Integrating resource selection information with spatial capture–recapture

  2012cited by this paper
• Uninformative Parameters and Model Selection Using Akaike's Information Criterion

  2010cited by this paper
• Spatially Explicit Maximum Likelihood Methods for Capture–Recapture Studies

  2008cited by this paper
• A hierarchical model for spatial capture-recapture data.

  2008cited by this paper
• Quantifying Landscape Ruggedness for Animal Habitat Analysis: A Case Study Using Bighorn Sheep in the Mojave Desert

  2007cited by this paper
• Interacting Effects of Climate Change, Landscape Conversion, and Harvest on Carnivore Populations at the Range Margin: Marten and Lynx in the Northern Appalachians

  2007cited by this paper
• Estimating the density of a jaguar population in the Brazilian Pantanal using camera-traps and capture–recapture sampling in combination with GPS radio-telemetry

  2006cited by this paper
• Density estimation in live‐trapping studies

  2004cited by this paper
• Mixture Models for Estimating the Size of a Closed Population When Capture Rates Vary among Individuals

  2003cited by this paper
• Marten Habitat Selection in a Clearcut Boreal Landscape

  2000cited by this paper
• THE COMPARISON OF USAGE AND AVAILABILITY MEASUREMENTS FOR EVALUATING RESOURCE PREFERENCE

  1980cited by this paper

• Integrating fecal DNA and telemetry to estimate wildlife densities in anthropogenic landscapes

  2026cites this paper
• Spatial capture‐recapture can improve environmental impact assessments for large carnivores

  2025cites this paper
• Hunter‐engaged monitoring of the Eurasian lynx during the reinforcement process

  2025cites this paper
• The long shadow of woody encroachment: An integrated approach to modeling grassland songbird habitat.

  2024cites this paper
• Seasonal fine‐scale resource selection of elk in the central Appalachian Mountains

  2024cites this paper
• Environmental impact assessment for large carnivores: a methodological review of the wolf Canis lupus monitoring in Portugal

  2024cites this paper
• An open spatial capture-recapture framework for estimating the abundance and seasonal dynamics of white sharks at aggregation sites

  2023cites this paper
• An integrated spatial capture–recapture approach reveals the distribution of a cryptic carnivore in a protected area

  2023cites this paper
• Bobcats in southern California respond to urbanization at multiple scales

  2023cites this paper
• Influence of landscape attributes on Virginia opossum density

  2022cites this paper
• Occupancy data improves parameter precision in spatial capture–recapture models

  2022cites this paper
• Diamondback Terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin terrapin) Density and Space Use in Dynamic Tidal Systems: Novel Insights from Spatial Capture–Recapture

  2022cites this paper
• Density‐habitat relationships of white‐tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in Finland

  2022cites this paper
• Improved inferences about landscape connectivity from spatial capture-recapture by integration of a movement model.

  2021influential citation
• An open spatial capture–recapture model for estimating density, movement, and population dynamics from line‐transect surveys

  2021cites this paper
• An integrated path for spatial capture–recapture and animal movement modeling

  2021cites this paper
• Experimental evaluation of spatial capture-recapture study design.

  2021cites this paper
• Collaboration for conservation: Assessing countrywide carnivore occupancy dynamics from sparse data

  2021cites this paper
• Integrating telemetry data at several scales with spatial capture–recapture to improve density estimates

  2021cites this paper
• Factors predicting habitat use by leopards in human-altered landscapes

  2021cites this paper
• Estimating the movements of terrestrial animal populations using broad-scale occurrence data

  2021cites this paper
• A review of spatial capture–recapture: Ecological insights, limitations, and prospects

  2021cites this paper
• Low wolverine (Gulo gulo) density in a national park complex of the Canadian Rocky Mountains

  2020cites this paper
• Identifying mechanisms of population change in two threatened grizzly bear populations

  2020cites this paper
• Insights from unseen individuals – using non-invasive approaches to study population biology of white-tailed deer in Finland

  2020cites this paper
• Precision as a metric for acoustic survey design using occupancy or spatial capture-recapture

  2020cites this paper
• Use of visual surveys and radiotelemetry reveals sources of detection bias for a cryptic snake at low densities

  2020cites this paper
• Drawn out of the shadows: Surveying secretive forest species with camera trap distance sampling

  2020cites this paper
• Challenges and opportunities in population monitoring of cheetahs

  2019cites this paper
• Factors associated with black bear density and implications for management

  2019cites this paper
• Using capture-recapture models in wildlife camera-trapping monitoring and the study case

  2019cites this paper
• oSCR: a spatial capture–recapture R package for inference about spatial ecological processes

  2019cites this paper
• Spatial density estimates of Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) in the French Jura and Vosges Mountains

  2019cites this paper
• Simulation-based validation of spatial capture-recapture models: A case study using mountain lions

  2019cites this paper
• Spatial Mark-Resight for Categorically Marked Populations with an Application to Genetic Capture-Recapture

  2018cites this paper
• Unifying population and landscape ecology with spatial capture–recapture

  2018cites this paper
• Integrating multiple genetic detection methods to estimate population density of social and territorial carnivores

  2018cites this paper
• Evaluating spatially explicit density estimates of unmarked wildlife detected by remote cameras

  2018cites this paper