SCIENCE@home

Nexus thinking – how ecosystem services can contribute to enhancing the cross-scale and cross-sectoral coherence between land use, spatial planning and policy-making

C. Fürst,S. Luque,D. Geneletti

Published 2017 in International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT The ecosystem service (ES) concept is acknowledged for its potential to support decision-making on various scales. Still, it lacks in practical implementation, particularly concerning spatial planning and land management – key aspects that lead to criticism in its applicability. ES in planning and decision-making can contribute to improve the quality of land use and management by integrating synergies, trade-offs and conflicts among economy, environment and societal goals. This opinion paper suggests a nexus approach that shows how ES can contribute to characterize the interactions between humans and nature on different temporal and spatial scales while integrating cross-scale effects in trade-off analyses. We discuss how our nexus approach can be implemented and contribute to revealing the interdependencies between policy sectors, spatial and land-use planning. We argue that thinking in terms of a nexus adds to an improved coherence across different policy sectors relevant for spatial planning. We conclude that only a strategic and concise use of ES throughout all decision levels will help to create maximum benefits for harmonizing policy, planning and management instruments supported by intervention measures for the sake of sustainable development. EDITED BY Christian Albert

PUBLICATION RECORD

  • Publication year

    2017

  • Venue

    International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management

  • Publication date

    2017-01-01

  • Fields of study

    Geography, Business, Economics, Environmental Science

  • Identifiers
    DOI 10.1080/21513732.2017.1396257
  • External record

    Open on Semantic Scholar

  • Source metadata

    Semantic Scholar

CITATION MAP

EXTRACTION MAP

CLAIMS

  • No claims are published for this paper.

CONCEPTS

  • No concepts are published for this paper.

REFERENCES

Showing 1-100 of 100 references · Page 1 of 1

CITED BY

Showing 1-49 of 49 citing papers · Page 1 of 1