Reforming Science: Structural Reforms

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2011

• Venue

  Infection and Immunity

• Publication date

  2011-12-19

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Philosophy, Political Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1128/IAI.06184-11PMID 22184420PMCID PMC3294664
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Expanding underrepresented minority participation: America's science and technology talent at the crossroads

  2013cited by this paper
• Weaving a Richer Tapestry in Biomedical Science

  2011cited by this paper
• Too many tasks

  2011cited by this paper
• U.S. science and austerity. Darwinism vs. social engineering at NIH.

  2011cited by this paper
• Reforming Science: Methodological and Cultural Reforms

  2011cited by this paper
• More time for research: Fund people not projects

  2011cited by this paper
• University Research Funding: The United States Is Behind and Falling.

  2011cited by this paper
• Keeping Women in the Science Pipeline

  2011influential reference
• Boosting Minorities in Science

  2011cited by this paper
• Career Flexibility and Family-Friendly Policies: An NIH-Funded Study to Enhance Women's Careers in Biomedical Sciences

  2011cited by this paper
• Study says middle sized labs do best

  2010cited by this paper
• Perspective: Is NIH Funding the “Best Science by the Best Scientists”? A Critique of the NIH R01 Research Grant Review Policies

  2010cited by this paper
• The Economics of New Faculty Hires in Basic Science

  2009cited by this paper
• Lost in Translation—Basic Science in the Era of Translational Research

  2009cited by this paper
• Was the institutional review board system a mistake?

  2009cited by this paper
• Managing the business of science.

  2009cited by this paper
• NIH Peer Review Reform—Change We Need, or Lipstick on a Pig?

  2009cited by this paper
• Biomedical research. Rejecting 'big science' tag, Collins sets five themes for NIH.

  2009cited by this paper
• Grinding to a halt: the effects of the increasing regulatory burden on research and quality improvement efforts.

  2009cited by this paper
• Leaky Pipes, Faustian Dilemmas, and a Room of One's Own: Can We Build a More Flexible Pipeline to Academic Success?

  2009cited by this paper
• Avoiding an overzealous approach: a perspective on regulatory burden.

  2008cited by this paper
• The Leaky Pipeline: Factors Associated With Early Decline in Interest in Premedical Studies Among Underrepresented Minority Undergraduate Students

  2008cited by this paper
• Sample Size and Precision in NIH Peer Review

  2008cited by this paper
• American Idol and NIH Grant Review.

  2006cited by this paper
• Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything

  2006cited by this paper
• Rising Above The Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future

  2006cited by this paper
• Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development

  1992cited by this paper
• Peerless Science: Peer Review and U. S. Science Policy

  1990cited by this paper
• Federal funding of basic research: the red tape mill.

  1981cited by this paper
• The Lives of a Cell: Notes of a Biology Watcher

  1974cited by this paper
• Infectious Diseases Society of America

  1969cited by this paper
• “Science, the Endless Frontier”

  1960cited by this paper

• Journals Operating Predatory Practices Are Systematically Eroding the Science Ethos: A Gate and Code Strategy to Minimise Their Operating Space and Restore Research Best Practice

  2025cites this paper
• Aquarium: open-source laboratory software for design, execution and data management

  2021cites this paper
• Tackling the reproducibility problem to empower translation of preclinical academic drug discovery: is there an answer?

  2021cites this paper
• The Cooperative Revolution Reaches Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy: An Example From Germany

  2020cites this paper
• Personal Motivations and Systemic Incentives: Scientists on Questionable Research Practices

  2020cites this paper
• Envisioning data sharing for the biocomputing community

  2019cites this paper
• Understanding of researcher behavior is required to improve data reliability

  2019cites this paper
• The Crisis in Science

  2019cites this paper
• On the use of blockchain-based mechanisms to tackle academic misconduct

  2019cites this paper
• Science and Christian Ethics

  2019cites this paper
• Have you heard the PEPS talk? Towards standardized public engagement practices for scientists (PEPS)

  2018cites this paper
• Competition in Science: Links Between Publication Pressure, Grant Pressure and the Academic Job Market

  2018cites this paper
• Making the scientific literature fail-safe.

  2018cites this paper
• What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?: An updated review of the literature and six case studies

  2018cites this paper
• Conducting Information Systems Research the Old-Fashioned Way

  2017cites this paper
• Reproducibility Issues: Avoiding Pitfalls in Animal Inflammation Models.

  2017cites this paper
• What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?

  2017cites this paper
• Competition in Science: Links Between Publication Pressure, Grant Pressure and the Academic Job Market

  2017cites this paper
• Strong Inference in Mathematical Modeling: A Method for Robust Science in the Twenty-First Century

  2016cites this paper
• Addressing the epidemic of scientific misconduct

  2016cites this paper
• Research Funding: the Case for a Modified Lottery

  2016cites this paper
• A Framework for Improving the Quality of Research in the Biological Sciences

  2016cites this paper
• Sanctions for research misconduct in cardiothoracic surgery journals.

  2016cites this paper
• Sanctions for Research Misconduct in Cardiothoracic Surgery Journals.

  2016cites this paper
• Life Science’s Average Publishable Unit (APU) Has Increased over the Past Two Decades

  2016cites this paper
• Institutional research and biomedical journals: Poor quality articles and honest researchers!

  2015cites this paper
• Science and Science Policy: Regulating “Select Agents” in the Age of Synthetic Biology

  2015cites this paper
• Increasing disparities between resource inputs and outcomes, as measured by certain health deliverables, in biomedical research

  2015cites this paper
• Commercialisation of Human Genetic Research

  2015cites this paper
• Institutions et revues biomédicales : des articles de mauvaise qualité et des chercheurs honnêtes !☆

  2015cites this paper
• Reproducibility in Science: Improving the Standard for Basic and Preclinical Research

  2015cites this paper
• Competitive Science: Is Competition Ruining Science?

  2015cites this paper
• Cellulase enzymes production from pistachio hull by different strains of Tichoderma fungi

  2014cites this paper
• Cultural Reforms Reforming Science: Methodological and

  2014cites this paper
• Specialized Science

  2014cites this paper
• Translational paradigms in pharmacology and drug discovery.

  2014cites this paper
• A Call for Examining Replication and Bias in Special Education Research

  2014cites this paper
• Reproducibility in Science Improving the Standard for Basic and Preclinical Research

  2014cites this paper
• Attrition of Women in the Biological Sciences: Workload, Motherhood, and Other Explanations Revisited

  2013cites this paper
• The next century of endocrinology.

  2013cites this paper
• Correction for “ Surface residues dynamically organize water bridges to enhance electron transfer between proteins

  2013cites this paper
• [Plagiarism is the emerged part of scientific misconduct].

  2013cites this paper
• Males Are Overrepresented among Life Science Researchers Committing Scientific Misconduct

  2013cites this paper
• Le plagiat est la partie émergée de la fraude scientifique

  2013cites this paper
• Is the Nobel Prize good for science?

  2013cites this paper
• and Ferric C . Fang Cultural Reforms Reforming Science : Methodological and

  2012cites this paper
• Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications

  2012cites this paper
• Reforming Science: Methodological and Cultural Reforms

  2011cites this paper