Nerve-sparing prostatectomy and urinary function: a prospective analysis using validated quality-of-life measures.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2009

• Venue

  Urology

• Publication date

  2009-06-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/j.urology.2008.10.077PMID 19362347
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors.

  2008cited by this paper
• Impact of nerve sparing technique on patient self-assessed outcomes after radical perineal prostatectomy.

  2007cited by this paper
• Nerve sparing open radical retropubic prostatectomy--does it have an impact on urinary continence?

  2006influential reference
• Post-robotic prostatectomy urinary continence: characterization of perfect continence versus occasional dribbling in pad-free men.

  2005cited by this paper
• Erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy.

  2005influential reference
• Radical prostatectomy: long-term cancer control and recovery of sexual and urinary function ("trifecta").

  2005cited by this paper
• Predicting quality of life after radical prostatectomy: results from CaPSURE.

  2004cited by this paper
• Intraoperative nerve stimulation with measurement of urethral sphincter pressure changes during radical retropubic prostatectomy: a feasibility study.

  2003influential reference
• Determinants of long-term sexual health outcome after radical prostatectomy measured by a validated instrument.

  2003cited by this paper
• A large prostate at radical retropubic prostatectomy does not adversely affect cancer control, continence or potency rates

  2003cited by this paper
• Variability of results of cavernous nerve stimulation during radical prostatectomy.

  2001cited by this paper
• The pathophysiology of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence: a clinical and video urodynamic study.

  2000cited by this paper
• Prospective assessment of patient reported urinary continence after radical prostatectomy.

  2000cited by this paper
• Incontinence after radical prostatectomy.

  1999cited by this paper
• Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies.

  1999cited by this paper
• Is intraoperative electrostimulation of erectile nerves possible?

  1999cited by this paper
• The etiology of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence and correlation of symptoms with urodynamic findings.

  1998cited by this paper
• The UCLA Prostate Cancer Index: development, reliability, and validity of a health-related quality of life measure.

  1998cited by this paper
• Risk factors for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy.

  1996cited by this paper
• Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire.

  1994cited by this paper
• Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference.

  1989cited by this paper
• Prostate shape, external striated urethral sphincter and radical prostatectomy: the apical dissection.

  1987cited by this paper
• The effect of pudendal nerve anesthesia on urinary continence after prostatectomy.

  1965cited by this paper

• Toggling Technique Allows Retrograde Early Release to Facilitate Neurovascular Bundle Sparing During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score-Matching Study

  2021cites this paper
• The Treatments for Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer

  2019cites this paper
• Breast Cancer, Version 4.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

  2018cites this paper
• Predictors of short-term recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy

  2015cites this paper
• Prostate cancer, version 2.2014.

  2014cites this paper
• Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after previous open transvesical adenomectomy

  2014cites this paper
• Posttherapy Follow‐up and First Intervention

  2014cites this paper
• NCCN Prostate Cancer , Version 2 . 2014 Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

  2014cites this paper
• Retrograde versus antegrade nerve sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: which is better for achieving early functional recovery?

  2013cites this paper
• Effect of a risk-stratified grade of nerve-sparing technique on early return of continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

  2013cites this paper
• Progress in pelvic anatomy from the viewpoint of radical prostatectomy

  2013cites this paper
• Guidelines on Prostate Cancer

  2013cites this paper
• Belastungsinkontinenz nach Prostatektomie in der Versorgungswirklichkeit

  2013cites this paper
• Prostate Cancer: Evidence Based Management Guidelines for Uganda.

  2011cites this paper
• Association between Proposed Quality of Care Indicators and Long-Term Outcomes for Men with Localized Prostate Cancer

  2011cites this paper
• Prävention der postoperativen Harninkontinenz

  2010cites this paper
• The impact of prostate biopsy and periprostatic nerve block on erectile and voiding function: a prospective study.

  2010cites this paper
• Prävention und Rehabilitation nach radikaler Prostatektomie - Teil II: Harninkontinenz

  2010cites this paper
• Researchers The NCCN Prostate Cancer Clinical Practice Guidelines in OncologyTM

  2010cites this paper
• The Quality-of-Life Impact of Prostate Cancer Treatments

  2010influential citation
• NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer.

  2010cites this paper
• [Urinary and sexual disorders following localised prostate cancer management].

  2010cites this paper
• Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology TM

  2009cites this paper
• Is There Correlation of Nerve-Sparing Status and Return to Baseline Urinary Function After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy?

  2009cites this paper
• Re: Abel et al.: Nerve-sparing prostatectomy and urinary function: a prospective analysis using validated quality-of-life measures. (Urology 2009;73:1336-1340).

  2009cites this paper