We argue that Koch's postulates are best understood within an interventionist account of causation, in the sense described in Woodward (2003). We show how this treatment helps to resolve interpretive puzzles associated with Koch's work and how it clarifies the different roles the postulates play in providing useful, yet not universal criteria for disease causation. Our paper is an effort at rational reconstruction; we attempt to show how Koch's postulates and reasoning make sense and are normatively justified within an interventionist framework and more difficult to understand within alternative frameworks for thinking about causation.
Koch's postulates: An interventionist perspective.
Published 2016 in Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2016
- Venue
Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences
- Publication date
2016-10-01
- Fields of study
Medicine, Philosophy
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar, PubMed
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-33 of 33 references · Page 1 of 1
CITED BY
Showing 1-43 of 43 citing papers · Page 1 of 1