Estimating costs and genetic benefits of various sizes of predator populations: the case of bear, wolf, wolverine and lynx in Sweden

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  1995

• Venue

  Journal of Environmental Management

• Publication date

  1995-04-01

• Fields of study

  Biology, Geography, Environmental Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/S0301-4797(95)90259-7
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Artfakta : Sveriges hotade och sällsynta ryggradsdjur, 1992

  1992cited by this paper
• Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method

  1989cited by this paper
• Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity

  1987cited by this paper
• Viable Populations for Conservation: Effective population size, genetic variation, and their use in population management

  1987cited by this paper
• Viable Populations for Conservation: List of contributors

  1987cited by this paper
• Ecology: Individuals, Populations and Communities

  1986cited by this paper
• Physiological ecology of animals

  1986cited by this paper
• Introduction to Quantitative Genetics.

  1962cited by this paper

• Economic Trade‐Offs of Land Use Change and Wildlife Values

  2025cites this paper
• Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Game Harvests in Sweden

  2023cites this paper
• Interests, Costs, Benefits, and the Social Complexity of Discomforts

  2019cites this paper
• Costs of Livestock Depredation by Large Carnivores in Sweden 2001 to 2013

  2018influential citation
• Essays on Resource Policy, Gender and Land rights

  2015cites this paper
• Economic valuation of forest recreation: The case of the University Forest of Pertouli in Greece

  2012cites this paper
• Svensk samhällsvetenskaplig viltforskning - en kunskapsöversikt

  2010cites this paper
• Relationships between biotic and abiotic range characteristics and productivity of reindeer husbandry in Sweden

  2009cites this paper
• Estimating cost functions for the four large carnivores in Sweden

  2008cites this paper
• How reliable are meta-analyses for international benefit transfers?

  2008cites this paper
• 20 Years of Stated Preference Valuation of Non-Timber Benefits from Fennoscandian Forests: A Meta-Analysis

  2007cites this paper
• (Short title: Non-Timber Benefits from Fennoscandian Forests: A Meta-Analysis)

  2006cites this paper
• Scandlynx: a vision for coordinated lynx research in Scandinavia

  2005cites this paper
• A REAL OPTIONS FRAMEWORK FOR MANAGING HUMAN-WILDLIFE CONFLICTS

  2004cites this paper
• Large Carnivore Control and Management Plan

  2004influential citation
• The Bioeconomics of the Spatial Distribution of an Endangered Species: The Case of the Swedish Wolf Population

  2003cites this paper
• Status of Large Carnivore Conservation in the Baltic States

  2002cites this paper
• Status of Large Carnivore Conservation in the

  2001cites this paper
• Technical Report on Methodology: Cost Benefit Analysis and Policy Responses

  2001cites this paper
• Home Range Size and Choice of Management Strategy for Lynx in Scandinavia

  2001cites this paper
• Conservation of biodiversity in Scandinavian boreal forests: large carnivores as flagships, umbrellas, indicators, or keystones?

  2000cites this paper
• Threatened Species as Public Goods and Public Bads

  1999cites this paper
• Valuing the wolf in Sweden : Are benefits contingent upon the supply?

  1999cites this paper
• Culling of lynxes Lynx lynx related to livestock predation in a heterogeneous landscape

  1998cites this paper
• Control of mammalian predators in game management and conservation

  1996cites this paper