Improving semiautomated zooplankton classification using an internal control and different imaging devices

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2012

• Venue

  Limnology and Oceanography: Methods

• Publication date

  2012-01-01

• Fields of study

  Biology, Chemistry, Environmental Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.4319/lom.2012.10.1
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Time to automate identification

  2010cited by this paper
• Digital zooplankton image analysis using the ZooScan integrated system

  2010influential reference
• Comparison between automated analysis of zooplankton using ZooImage and traditional methodology

  2009cited by this paper
• Optimizing the number of classes in automated zooplankton classification

  2009cited by this paper
• Assessment of ZooImage as a tool for the classification of zooplankton

  2008cited by this paper
• Description and modelling of plankton biomass distribution in the bay of biscay by means of image analisis-based methods

  2007cited by this paper
• RAPID: Research on Automated Plankton Identification

  2007cited by this paper
• Automatic image analysis of plankton: future perspectives

  2006cited by this paper
• A three‐axis fast‐tow digital Video Plankton Recorder for rapid surveys of plankton taxa and hydrography

  2005cited by this paper
• Enumeration, measurement, and identification of net zooplankton samples using the ZOOSCAN digital imaging system

  2004cited by this paper
• Do experts make mistakes? A comparison of human and machine identification of dinoflagellates

  2003cited by this paper
• Estimating zooplankton biomass through image analysis

  2003cited by this paper
• Zooplankton Methodology Manual

  2000cited by this paper
• Automatic Plankton Image Recognition

  1998cited by this paper
• A comparison of fixatives for the estimation of abundance and biovolume of marine planktonic ciliate populations

  1994cited by this paper
• Effect of interreplicate variance on zooplankton sampling design and data analysis1

  1987cited by this paper
• An egg production method for estimating spawning biomass of pelagic fish : application to the Northern Anchovy, Engraulis mordax

  1985cited by this paper
• In-situ silhouette photography of Gulf Stream zooplankton

  1981cited by this paper
• Silhouette photography of oceanic zooplankton

  1979cited by this paper
• On the variability of replicate plankton samples and some applications of ‘contagious’ series to the statistical distribution of catches over restricted periods

  1951cited by this paper

• Towards Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence for Marine Research, Fisheries and Environmental Management

  2026cites this paper
• Unsupervised Learning Approaches for Zooplankton Classification: Recent Trends and Advances

  2023cites this paper
• SMACC: A System for Microplastics Automatic Counting and Classification

  2020cites this paper
• A new method for analyzing microplastic particle size distribution in marine environmental samples

  2019cites this paper
• Automatic Counting and Classification of Microplastic Particles

  2018cites this paper
• Fertilization and connectivity in the Garrucha Canyon (SE-Spain) implications for Marine Spatial Planning.

  2017cites this paper
• Detecting the presence-absence of bluefin tuna by automated analysis of medium-range sonars on fishing vessels

  2017cites this paper
• The ZooCAM, a new in-flow imaging system for fast onboard counting, sizing and classification of fish eggs and metazooplankton

  2017cites this paper
• Detecting, counting and sizing bluefin tuna schools using medium range sonars of baitboats in the Bay of Biscay.

  2017cites this paper
• Acoustic detection of larval fish aggregations in Galician waters (NW Spain)

  2016cites this paper
• Improving a semi‐automated classification technique for bivalve larvae: Automated image acquisition and measures of quality control

  2016cites this paper
• Semi-automated classification method addressing marine strategy framework directive (MSFD) zooplankton indicators

  2016cites this paper
• Community response of zooplankton to oceanographic changes (2002–2012) in the central/southern upwelling system of Chile

  2016cites this paper
• Seasonal and historical mesozooplankton dynamics in Delaware Bay: an application and optimization of the ZooScan optical imaging tool

  2016cites this paper
• Visual rhythm for particle analysis in sample‐in‐flow systems: Application for continuous plankton monitoring

  2015cites this paper
• Trophodynamics and diet overlap of small pelagic fish species in the Bay of Biscay

  2015cites this paper
• Evaluating and improving a semi‐automated image analysis technique for identifying bivalve larvae

  2014cites this paper
• Análisis automático de zooplancton utilizando imágenes digitalizadas: estado del conocimiento y perspectivas en Latinoamérica

  2013cites this paper
• Spatial distribution of the stomach weights of juvenile anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus L.) in the Bay of Biscay

  2013cites this paper
• Automatic analysis of zooplankton using digitized images: state of the art and perspectives for Latin America

  2013cites this paper
• Development and deployment of a point‐source digital inline holographic microscope for the study of plankton and particles to a depth of 6000 m

  2013cites this paper
• Spring-time zooplankton size structure over the continental shelf of the Bay of Biscay

  2013cites this paper
• Development and Deployment of a Point-Source Digital Inline Holographic Microscope for the Study of Plankton and Particles to a Depth of 6000

  2013cites this paper