Some fallacies of human-subjects protection, and some solutions.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2015

• Venue

  Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior

• Publication date

  2015-04-01

• Fields of study

  Law, Philosophy, Medicine, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.11.004PMID 25529379
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• How Variability in the Institutional Review Board Review Process Affects Minimal-Risk Multisite Health Services Research

  2012cited by this paper
• Viewpoint: A method to estimate the cost in lives of ethics board review of biomedical research

  2011cited by this paper
• Viewpoint: Are the research ethics committees working in the best interests of participants in an increasingly globalized research environment?

  2011cited by this paper
• Belief-Overkill in Political Judgments

  2009cited by this paper
• Principal Investigator Views of the IRB System

  2008cited by this paper
• Payment for research participation: a coercive offer?

  2008cited by this paper
• Ethics in human subjects research: do incentives matter?

  2004cited by this paper
• Paying hypertension research subjects

  2002cited by this paper
• Heuristics and Biases: Clinical versus Actuarial Judgment

  2002cited by this paper
• Money for Research Participation: Does It Jeopardize Informed Consent?

  2001cited by this paper
• Do surrogate decision makers provide accurate consent for intensive care research?

  2001cited by this paper
• Norm-Endorsement Utilitarianism and the Nature of Utility

  1996cited by this paper
• On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning

  1983cited by this paper

• The ethics of student participation in economic experiments: Arguments and evidence

  2020cites this paper
• Book Review: Simon N Whitney, Balanced Ethics Review: A Guide for Institutional Review Board Members

  2018cites this paper
• Looking back to go forward: Promoting single case studies.

  2017cites this paper
• An integrated psychology virtual research ethics committee

  2016cites this paper
• Clinical postcards.

  2015cites this paper
• Principled research ethics in practice? Reflections for neuroethics and bioethics.

  2015influential citation
• 'Human subjects research' as stigmatized activity: Implications for oversight reform.

  2015cites this paper
• The cauldron of the ethical review process in human participant research.

  2015cites this paper
• Cooperation between neuropsychology researchers and ethical committees: Room for improvement?

  2015cites this paper