To Plan for the User Is to Plan with the User: Integrating User Interaction into the Planning Process

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2017

• Venue

  Companion Technology

• Publication date

  Unknown publication date

• Fields of study

  Computer Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-43665-4_7
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Companion-Technology: An Overview

  2016influential reference
• Change the Plan - How Hard Can That Be?

  2016cited by this paper
• Interview with David E. Smith

  2016cited by this paper
• A Planning-Based Assistance System for Setting Up a Home Theater

  2015cited by this paper
• Coherence Across Components in Cognitive Systems - One Ontology to Rule Them All

  2015cited by this paper
• The Interplay of User-Centered Dialog Systems and AI Planning

  2015cited by this paper
• Plan, Repair, Execute, Explain - How Planning Helps to Assemble your Home Theater

  2014cited by this paper
• Probabilistic Human-Computer Trust Handling

  2014cited by this paper
• Goal-directed Generation of Exercise Sets for Upper-Limb Rehabilitation

  2014cited by this paper
• From Abstract Crisis to Concrete Relief — A Preliminary Report on Combining State Abstraction and HTN Planning

  2014cited by this paper
• The understandability of OWL statements in controlled English

  2013cited by this paper
• Generating Natural Language Descriptions from OWL Ontologies: the NaturalOWL System

  2013cited by this paper
• Predicting the Understandability of OWL Inferences

  2013influential reference
• Towards Explicative Inference for OWL

  2013cited by this paper
• Adaptive probabilistic fission for multimodal systems

  2012cited by this paper
• On the Decidability of HTN Planning with Task Insertion

  2011cited by this paper
• Web Service Composition with User Preferences

  2008cited by this paper
• The Manchester OWL Syntax

  2006cited by this paper
• FaCT++ Description Logic Reasoner: System Description

  2006cited by this paper
• Description Logics and Planning

  2005cited by this paper
• MAPGEN: Mixed-Initiative Planning and Scheduling for the Mars Exploration Rover Mission

  2004cited by this paper
• HTN planning for Web Service composition using SHOP2

  2004cited by this paper
• Applications of SHOP and SHOP2

  2004cited by this paper
• A Mixed-initiative Framework for Robust Plan Sketching

  2003cited by this paper
• AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität

  2003cited by this paper
• Measuring Human-Computer Trust

  2000influential reference
• Explaining ALC Subsumption

  2000cited by this paper
• TRIPS: An Integrated Intelligent Problem-Solving Assistant

  1998cited by this paper
• Why is Modal Logic So Robustly Decidable?

  1996cited by this paper
• UMCP: A Sound and Complete Procedure for Hierarchical Task-network Planning

  1994cited by this paper
• UCPOP: A Sound, Complete, Partial Order Planner for ADL

  1992cited by this paper
• Systematic Nonlinear Planning

  1991cited by this paper
• Attributive Concept Descriptions with Complements

  1991cited by this paper
• A Cognitive Model of Planning

  1979cited by this paper
• Planning meals: Problem-solving on a real data-base

  1977cited by this paper

• A Review of Plan-Based Approaches for Dialogue Management

  2022influential citation
• A Goal-Based Framework for Supporting Medical Assistance: The Case of Chronic Diseases

  2020cites this paper
• A companion-system architecture for realizing individualized and situation-adaptive user assistance

  2018cites this paper