Factors affecting nonmedical participants' allocation of scarce medical resources.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  1998

• Venue

  Journal of social behavior and personality

• Publication date

  1998-12-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Psychology

• Identifiers
  PMID 12211259
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Ethical ideology and the allocation of scarce medical resources.

  1997cited by this paper
• Factors relating to the allocation of medical resources.

  1996cited by this paper
• Ethical ideology and moral choice: a study concerning the allocation of medical resources.

  1993cited by this paper
• Who should get the kidney machine?

  1992cited by this paper
• Allocating health resources.

  1988cited by this paper
• Dialysis or death? Doctors should stop covering up for an inadequate health service.

  1986cited by this paper
• Priorities in the allocation of scarce resources.

  1986cited by this paper
• The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.

  1981cited by this paper

• The Allocation of a Scarce Medical Resource: A Cross-Cultural Study Investigating the Influence of Life Style Factors and Patient Gender, and the Coherence of Decision-making

  2021influential citation
• A Cross-Cultural Investigation of the Lifestyle Factors Affecting Laypeople’s Allocation of a Scarce Medical Resource

  2020cites this paper
• The Effect of Becoming Disabled on the Subjective Well-Being of Religious and Nonreligious People

  2019cites this paper
• Assessing societal and offender perspectives on the value of offender healthcare: a stated preference research protocol

  2019cites this paper
• Allocating a scarce mental health treatment to the underweight and overweight

  2018cites this paper
• Religiosity and Crime Revisited: Accounting for Non-Believers

  2018cites this paper
• Perceived experiences of atheist discrimination: Instrument development and evaluation.

  2016cites this paper
• Nonreligion and Atheism

  2016cites this paper
• The Myth of the Angry Atheist

  2015cites this paper
• Why are religious people happy? The effect of the social norm of religiosity across countries.

  2013cites this paper
• Seeking a Framework: The Benefits and Challenges of Using Existing Research on LGBT Students to Examine Identity Development of Nontheistic Students

  2013cites this paper
• On the Receiving End: Discrimination toward the Non-Religious in the United States

  2012cites this paper
• Forms, Frequency, and Correlates of Perceived Anti-Atheist Discrimination

  2012cites this paper
• Insights from triangulation of two purchase choice elicitation methods to predict social decision making in healthcare

  2012cites this paper
• Societal preferences for standard health insurance coverage in the Netherlands: a cross-sectional study

  2012cites this paper
• Anti-Atheist Bias in the United States: Testing Two Critical Assumptions

  2012cites this paper
• Prioritizing Patients for Surgery: Factors Affecting Allocation of Medical Resources for Kidney Transplantation, IVF, and Rhinoplasty1

  2011cites this paper
• The Role of Religion and Spirituality in Counseling

  2011cites this paper
• Different patient subgroup, different ranking? Which quality indicators do patients find important when choosing a hospital for hip- or knee arthroplasty?

  2011cites this paper
• Extending Religion-Health Research to Secular Minorities: Issues and Concerns

  2011cites this paper
• The Effects of Facial Expression on Out-Group Discrimination

  2010influential citation
• Atheism, Secularity, and Well‐Being: How the Findings of Social Science Counter Negative Stereotypes and Assumptions

  2009cites this paper
• Atheism and Nonspirituality as Diversity Issues in Counseling.

  2007cites this paper
• Criteria for the Allocation of Medical Resources: Citizens' Perspectives

  2007cites this paper
• Die Position der Betroffenen: Alltagsethische Einstellungen von Dialysepatienten zur Organallokation

  2003cites this paper