Do chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and 2-year-old children (Homo sapiens) understand double invisible displacement?

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2006

• Venue

  Journal of Comparative Psychology

• Publication date

  Unknown publication date

• Fields of study

  Medicine, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1037/0735-7036.120.2.89PMID 16719586
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Do chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) understand single invisible displacement?

  2005cited by this paper
• Do dogs (Canis familiaris) understand invisible displacement?

  2004cited by this paper
• Imitation recognition in a captive chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes)

  2004cited by this paper
• From mating to mentality: evaluating evolutionary psychology

  2003cited by this paper
• Looking and search measures of object knowledge in preschool children.

  2003cited by this paper
• Reinterpreting the mentality of apes

  2003cited by this paper
• Early representational insight: twenty-four-month-olds can use a photo to find an object in the world.

  2003cited by this paper
• The effect of response contingencies on scale model task performance by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

  2001cited by this paper
• Object permanence in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and children (Homo sapiens).

  2001cited by this paper
• Mental evolution and development: evidence for secondary representation in children, great ages, and other animals.

  2001cited by this paper
• Mental evolution and development: Evidence for secondary representation in children, great apes, and other animals.

  2001cited by this paper
• Constraints on problem solving and inhibition: Object retrieval in Cotton-Top Tamarins

  1999cited by this paper
• Can memory requirements account for species' differences in invisible displacement tasks?

  1999cited by this paper
• Object permanence in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) and squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus).

  1998cited by this paper
• Cross-sectional study of object permanence in domestic puppies (Canis familiaris).

  1994cited by this paper
• Understanding the Representational Mind

  1993cited by this paper
• Search behavior of dogs (Canis familiaris) in invisible displacement problems

  1993cited by this paper
• Search behavior in various breeds of adult dogs (Canis familiaris): object permanence and olfactory cues.

  1992cited by this paper
• Neuropsychological insights into the meaning of object concept development.

  1991cited by this paper
• Stage 6 object concept in nonhuman primate cognition: A comparison between gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) and Japanese macaque (Macaca fuscata).

  1986cited by this paper
• Object permanence in five-month-old infants.

  1985cited by this paper
• Developments in infants' search for displaced objects.

  1983cited by this paper
• The effects of task and practice on search for invisibly displaced objects

  1981cited by this paper
• Piagetian Assessment on Cognitive Development in Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes)

  1981cited by this paper
• Piagetian object-permanence in Cebus capucinus, Lagothrica flavicauda and Pan troglodytes

  1976cited by this paper
• The construction of reality in the child

  1954cited by this paper

• How similar are humans and chimpanzees in expressed proteins as estimated by mass spectrometry-based serum proteomics?

  2026cites this paper
• What animals can tell us about attentional prerequisites of language acquisition

  2023cites this paper
• Higher Cognitive Abilities in Birds: A Comparative Evolutionary Analysis

  2022cites this paper
• Higher Cognitive Abilities in Birds: A Comparative Evolutionary Analysis

  2022cites this paper
• Archaeological evidence for thinking about possibilities in hominin evolution

  2022cites this paper
• Knowledge in Sight: Toddlers Plan Efficient Epistemic Actions by Anticipating Learning Gains

  2022cites this paper
• Cognitive dissonance from 2 years of age: Toddlers', but not infants', blind choices induce preferences.

  2021cites this paper
• Socio-spatial cognition in cats: Mentally mapping owner’s location from voice

  2021cites this paper
• Macphail’s Null Hypothesis of Vertebrate Intelligence: Insights From Avian Cognition

  2020cites this paper
• What is cognition ? My Word

  2019cites this paper
• What is cognition?

  2019cites this paper
• Kea (Nestor notabilis) represent object trajectory and identity

  2019cites this paper
• What do monkeys know about others' knowledge?

  2018influential citation
• Where’s the cookie? The ability of monkeys to track object transpositions

  2018influential citation
• Does size really matter? Investigating cognitive differences in spatial memory ability based on size in domestic dogs.

  2017cites this paper
• Social and Emotional Development in Infant and Early Childhood Mental Health

  2016cites this paper
• ARE LARGE DOGS SMARTER THAN SMALL DOGS? INVESTIGATING WITHIN SPECIES DIFFERENCES IN LARGE AND SMALL DOGS: SPATIAL MEMORY

  2015cites this paper
• Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and human children (Homo sapiens) know when they are ignorant about the location of food

  2015cites this paper
• The nature, ontogeny, and phylogeny of episodic foresight

  2015cites this paper
• Cognitive and linguistic sources of variance in 2-year-olds’ speech-sound discrimination: a preliminary investigation.

  2014cites this paper
• Double invisible displacement understanding in orangutans: testing in non-locomotor and locomotor space

  2014influential citation
• Great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo abelii) follow visual trails to locate hidden food.

  2014cites this paper
• Object permanence in domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) and gray wolves (Canis lupus).

  2013cites this paper
• From Cell-Surface Receptors to Higher Learning: A Whole World of Experience

  2012cites this paper
• Solution of Revecz-Krushinskii test by animals of different taxonomic groups

  2012cites this paper
• Comprehension of object permanence and single transposition in gibbons

  2012cites this paper
• Solution of Revecz-Krushinskii test by animals of different taxonomic groups

  2012cites this paper
• Inhibitie en werkgeheugen bij peuters

  2011cites this paper
• Inferential reasoning by exclusion in great apes, lesser apes, and spider monkeys.

  2011cites this paper
• Linking yesterday and tomorrow: preschoolers' ability to report temporally displaced events.

  2010cites this paper
• OBJECT PERMANENCE IN ORANGUTANS, GORILLAS, AND BLACK-AND-WHITE RUFFED LEMURS

  2009cites this paper
• Ethics and Animal Consciousness: How Rubber the Ethical Ruler?

  2009cites this paper
• AZ ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÓ EVOLÚCIÓS PERSPEKTÍVA SZEREPE A PIEGETIÁNUS TÁRGYÁLLANDÓSÁG ÉRTELMEZÉSÉBEN

  2009cites this paper
• Cognitive Understanding of Object Permanence in Mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx, L.)

  2009cites this paper
• The evolution of primate visual self-recognition: evidence of absence in lesser apes

  2009cites this paper
• Comparing dogs and great apes in their ability to visually track object transpositions

  2009cites this paper
• Comparative intelligence and intelligent comparisons

  2008cites this paper
• Executive function in preschoolers: a review using an integrative framework.

  2008cites this paper
• Explaining human cognitive autapomorphies

  2008cites this paper
• Object permanence tests on gibbons (Hylobatidae).

  2008cites this paper
• Searching and planning: young children's reasoning about past and future event sequences.

  2008cites this paper
• Darwin's mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds

  2008cites this paper
• The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans?

  2007cites this paper
• What makes us human (Homo sapiens)? The challenge of cognitive cross-species comparison.

  2007cites this paper
• Invisible displacement understanding in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris): the role of visual cues in search behavior

  2007cites this paper