{"corpus_id":12924416,"paper_sha":"9eacd7d43c95be4c4771bf1a324e200918e6c0cd","doi":"10.1177/0049124118782533","arxiv_id":"1703.09207","pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"mag_id":2599025709,"dblp_id":null,"acl_id":null,"title":"Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Art","year":2017,"publication_date":"2017-03-27","venue":"Sociological Methods & Research","journal":{"name":"Sociological Methods & Research","pages":"3 - 44","volume":"50"},"journal_issn":null,"journal_title":null,"publication_types":["JournalArticle"],"pubmed_pub_types":null,"s2_fields_of_study":["Law","Computer Science","Mathematics","Psychology","Sociology"],"reference_count":124,"citation_count":1094,"influential_citation_count":91,"is_open_access":true,"arxiv_categories":["stat.ML"],"arxiv_license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","arxiv_journal_ref":null,"mesh_headings":null,"chemicals":null,"comments_corrections":null,"source_flags":1,"s2_open_access_pdf_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/1703.09207","s2_open_access_landing_url":"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9eacd7d43c95be4c4771bf1a324e200918e6c0cd","s2_open_access_license":null,"s2_open_access_status":"GREEN","pmc_open_access_pdf_url":null,"pmc_open_access_landing_url":null,"pmc_open_access_license":null,"pmc_open_access_status":null,"unpaywall_open_access_pdf_url":null,"unpaywall_open_access_landing_url":null,"unpaywall_open_access_license":null,"unpaywall_open_access_status":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Discussions of fairness in criminal justice risk assessments typically lack conceptual precision. Rhetoric too often substitutes for careful analysis. In this article, we seek to clarify the trade-offs between different kinds of fairness and between fairness and accuracy. Methods: We draw on the existing literatures in criminology, computer science, and statistics to provide an integrated examination of fairness and accuracy in criminal justice risk assessments. We also provide an empirical illustration using data from arraignments. Results: We show that there are at least six kinds of fairness, some of which are incompatible with one another and with accuracy. Conclusions: Except in trivial cases, it is impossible to maximize accuracy and fairness at the same time and impossible simultaneously to satisfy all kinds of fairness. In practice, a major complication is different base rates across different legally protected groups. There is a need to consider challenging trade-offs. These lessons apply to applications well beyond criminology where assessments of risk can be used by decision makers. Examples include mortgage lending, employment, college admissions, child welfare, and medical diagnoses.","claims":[{"public_id":"cl_cd3fc79c49efd971b5957f7eaee5c9bc","status":"active","text":"At least six distinct kinds of fairness can be identified in criminal justice risk assessments, and some are mutually incompatible with one another and with accuracy.","confidence":0.98,"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_cd3fc79c49efd971b5957f7eaee5c9bc"},{"public_id":"cl_616a562f7db87ed20e533a559cc70d7a","status":"active","text":"Different base rates across legally protected groups are a major complication for fairness assessment in risk prediction.","confidence":0.93,"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_616a562f7db87ed20e533a559cc70d7a"},{"public_id":"cl_296d2d4d107b1f987e8ce13030558c26","status":"active","text":"Except in trivial cases, accuracy and fairness cannot be maximized at the same time, and all kinds of fairness cannot be satisfied simultaneously.","confidence":0.97,"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_296d2d4d107b1f987e8ce13030558c26"},{"public_id":"cl_20793c81a3fba32a5b19b1498545948d","status":"active","text":"The analysis provides an integrated examination of fairness and accuracy in criminal justice risk assessments using literature from criminology, computer science, and statistics, together with an empirical illustration based on arraignment data.","confidence":0.95,"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_20793c81a3fba32a5b19b1498545948d"}],"concepts":[{"public_id":"co_1e990d3dce064520af0dda32fbb1b89a","status":"active","name":"accuracy","description":"The degree to which a risk assessment correctly predicts outcomes.","types":["performance measure"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_1e990d3dce064520af0dda32fbb1b89a"},{"public_id":"co_22ec625369c9c25a6c436da346db449e","status":"active","name":"legally protected groups","description":"Groups defined by law as protected from discrimination in decision making.","types":["group"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_22ec625369c9c25a6c436da346db449e"},{"public_id":"co_4a9bb1cd6e3e3231280008fc2cbef3e6","status":"active","name":"fairness in criminal justice risk assessments","description":"Judgments about whether risk assessment tools used in criminal justice treat people equitably.","types":["concept"],"aliases":["fairness"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_4a9bb1cd6e3e3231280008fc2cbef3e6"},{"public_id":"co_669d639123e4c61c3d228acd6d1e65a7","status":"active","name":"computer science","description":"The discipline contributing computational and algorithmic perspectives to the analysis.","types":["discipline"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_669d639123e4c61c3d228acd6d1e65a7"},{"public_id":"co_6b78a92447d4d82bfddae382e34926a8","status":"active","name":"kinds of fairness","description":"Different formal criteria or definitions used to evaluate fairness in risk assessment.","types":["concept"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_6b78a92447d4d82bfddae382e34926a8"},{"public_id":"co_c23f9f569b6d431ee20b6206ab15ff09","status":"active","name":"statistics","description":"The discipline contributing quantitative methods for comparing fairness and accuracy.","types":["discipline"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_c23f9f569b6d431ee20b6206ab15ff09"},{"public_id":"co_caeac2ac612750bb54aeaf099df61733","status":"active","name":"integrated examination of fairness and accuracy","description":"A combined analysis drawing on multiple disciplines to study fairness and predictive accuracy together.","types":["analysis"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_caeac2ac612750bb54aeaf099df61733"},{"public_id":"co_e57df66b073c9d7bf7f2b817e519e09e","status":"active","name":"criminology","description":"The study of crime, criminal behavior, and criminal justice systems.","types":["discipline"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_e57df66b073c9d7bf7f2b817e519e09e"},{"public_id":"co_e79c31037add23764f888e9079e6e26a","status":"active","name":"base rates","description":"Outcome frequencies that differ across groups and affect predictive evaluation.","types":["statistical concept"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_e79c31037add23764f888e9079e6e26a"},{"public_id":"co_f3dd58c6ceefd7083545b69b6d6b44bf","status":"active","name":"arraignment data","description":"Data from arraignments used as an empirical example in the analysis.","types":["dataset"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_f3dd58c6ceefd7083545b69b6d6b44bf"}],"external_ids":{"DOI":"10.1177/0049124118782533","ArXiv":"1703.09207","PubMed":null,"PubMedCentral":null,"MAG":2599025709,"DBLP":null,"ACL":null},"open_access":{"is_open_access":true,"pdf_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/1703.09207","landing_url":"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9eacd7d43c95be4c4771bf1a324e200918e6c0cd","source":"semantic_scholar","pdf_url_source":"semantic_scholar_open_access_pdf","license":null,"status":"GREEN","reason":null},"reference_availability":{"status":"available","references_indexed":true,"full_text_available":true,"full_text_source":"arxiv","count_basis":"semantic_scholar_metadata","extraction_status":"not_applicable","reason":null},"source":{"provider":"episteme2","base_corpus":"semantic_scholar_dump","freshness_mode":"unknown","basis":["semantic_scholar_metadata","postgres_metadata"],"limits":["paper metadata is based on indexed upstream scholarly datasets","claims and concepts are available only for extracted papers","absence of claims or concepts means no extracted graph data is available in this response"],"status":"available","degraded":false,"degraded_reasons":[],"diagnostics":{"status":"available","degraded":false,"degraded_reasons":[],"metadata_status":"available","graph_status":"available","abstract_status":"available"},"source_flags":1},"paper_id":636993,"paper_uid":"da5fe104-615a-4854-8f62-0ef2ccfda7d9","canonical_identity":{"paper_id":636993,"paper_uid":"da5fe104-615a-4854-8f62-0ef2ccfda7d9","identity_status":"available","lookup_basis":"semantic_scholar_external_id","compatibility_path":"corpus_id"},"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/papers/12924416"}