{"corpus_id":130447093,"paper_sha":"1b1d074595d68362ef09498c3f2a53a41066d61d","doi":"10.1080/10106049.2016.1140824","arxiv_id":null,"pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"mag_id":2259343653,"dblp_id":null,"acl_id":null,"title":"A GIS-based comparative study of Dempster-Shafer, logistic regression and artificial neural network models for landslide susceptibility mapping","year":2017,"publication_date":"2017-04-03","venue":"","journal":{"name":"Geocarto International","pages":"367 - 385","volume":"32"},"journal_issn":null,"journal_title":null,"publication_types":["Review"],"pubmed_pub_types":null,"s2_fields_of_study":["Geography","Computer Science","Environmental Science"],"reference_count":70,"citation_count":169,"influential_citation_count":7,"is_open_access":false,"arxiv_categories":null,"arxiv_license":null,"arxiv_journal_ref":null,"mesh_headings":null,"chemicals":null,"comments_corrections":null,"source_flags":1,"s2_open_access_pdf_url":null,"s2_open_access_landing_url":null,"s2_open_access_license":null,"s2_open_access_status":null,"pmc_open_access_pdf_url":null,"pmc_open_access_landing_url":null,"pmc_open_access_license":null,"pmc_open_access_status":null,"unpaywall_open_access_pdf_url":null,"unpaywall_open_access_landing_url":null,"unpaywall_open_access_license":null,"unpaywall_open_access_status":null,"abstract":"The main aim of present study is to compare three GIS-based models, namely Dempster–Shafer (DS), logistic regression (LR) and artificial neural network (ANN) models for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Shangzhou District of Shangluo City, Shaanxi Province, China. At First, landslide locations were identified by aerial photographs and supported by field surveys, and a total of 145 landslide locations were mapped in the study area. Subsequently, the landslide inventory was randomly divided into two parts (70/30) using Hawths Tools in ArcGIS 10.0 for training and validation purposes, respectively. In the present study, 14 landslide conditioning factors such as altitude, slope angle, slope aspect, topographic wetness index, sediment transport index, stream power index, plan curvature, profile curvature, lithology, rainfall, distance to rivers, distance to roads, distance to faults and normalized different vegetation index were used to detect the most susceptible areas. In the next step, landslide susceptible areas were mapped using the DS, LR and ANN models based on landslide conditioning factors. Finally, the accuracies of the landslide susceptibility maps produced from the three models were verified using the area under the curve (AUC). The validation results showed that the landslide susceptibility map generated by the ANN model has the highest training accuracy (73.19%), followed by the LR model (71.37%), and the DS model (66.42%). Similarly, the AUC plot for prediction accuracy presents that ANN model has the highest accuracy (69.62%), followed by the LR model (68.94%), and the DS model (61.39%). According to the validation results of the AUC curves, the map produced by these models exhibits the satisfactory properties.","claims":[{"public_id":"cl_0c28d02c1628bca825c30bac90ae5b8d","status":"active","text":"The ANN model achieved the highest training accuracy (73.19%) among the three models for landslide susceptibility mapping.","confidence":0.95,"contributors":[{"id":32,"public_id":"7c402c1b98","public_label":"뀨 (7c402c1b98)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/7c402c1b98"},{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"},{"id":391,"public_id":"x53qfq3ny9","public_label":"kafkapple (x53qfq3ny9)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/x53qfq3ny9"},{"id":1165,"public_id":"ezd9qvkvax","public_label":"The Reverser‮ (ezd9qvkvax)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/ezd9qvkvax"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_0c28d02c1628bca825c30bac90ae5b8d"},{"public_id":"cl_6d5f48969176e2538202d1c0fc44fc76","status":"active","text":"The ANN model yielded the highest prediction accuracy (69.62%) based on AUC plot, followed by the LR model (68.94%) and the DS model (61.39%).","confidence":0.95,"contributors":[{"id":32,"public_id":"7c402c1b98","public_label":"뀨 (7c402c1b98)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/7c402c1b98"},{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"},{"id":391,"public_id":"x53qfq3ny9","public_label":"kafkapple (x53qfq3ny9)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/x53qfq3ny9"},{"id":1165,"public_id":"ezd9qvkvax","public_label":"The Reverser‮ (ezd9qvkvax)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/ezd9qvkvax"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_6d5f48969176e2538202d1c0fc44fc76"},{"public_id":"cl_7ed8e7e58c0d31ffdc23e2ebca3999e6","status":"active","text":"The DS model achieved the lowest training accuracy (66.42%) among the three models.","confidence":0.95,"contributors":[{"id":32,"public_id":"7c402c1b98","public_label":"뀨 (7c402c1b98)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/7c402c1b98"},{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"},{"id":391,"public_id":"x53qfq3ny9","public_label":"kafkapple (x53qfq3ny9)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/x53qfq3ny9"},{"id":1165,"public_id":"ezd9qvkvax","public_label":"The Reverser‮ (ezd9qvkvax)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/ezd9qvkvax"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_7ed8e7e58c0d31ffdc23e2ebca3999e6"},{"public_id":"cl_08e175c0644f5e7b871bb6c2113c5c70","status":"active","text":"The LR model achieved a training accuracy of 71.37%, lower than the ANN model but higher than the DS model.","confidence":0.95,"contributors":[{"id":32,"public_id":"7c402c1b98","public_label":"뀨 (7c402c1b98)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/7c402c1b98"},{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"},{"id":391,"public_id":"x53qfq3ny9","public_label":"kafkapple (x53qfq3ny9)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/x53qfq3ny9"},{"id":1165,"public_id":"ezd9qvkvax","public_label":"The Reverser‮ (ezd9qvkvax)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/ezd9qvkvax"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_08e175c0644f5e7b871bb6c2113c5c70"}],"concepts":[{"public_id":"co_5131bc5c300678e1a17226fc74181489","status":"active","name":"ANN model","description":"Artificial neural network model used for landslide susceptibility mapping in this study.","types":["method"],"aliases":["artificial neural network model"],"contributors":[{"id":32,"public_id":"7c402c1b98","public_label":"뀨 (7c402c1b98)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/7c402c1b98"},{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"},{"id":391,"public_id":"x53qfq3ny9","public_label":"kafkapple (x53qfq3ny9)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/x53qfq3ny9"},{"id":1165,"public_id":"ezd9qvkvax","public_label":"The Reverser‮ (ezd9qvkvax)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/ezd9qvkvax"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_5131bc5c300678e1a17226fc74181489"},{"public_id":"co_6179ee22e99a54c1005fc5c7df70613f","status":"active","name":"landslide conditioning factors","description":"The 14 factors (altitude, slope angle, slope aspect, topographic wetness index, sediment transport index, stream power index, plan curvature, profile curvature, lithology, rainfall, distance to rivers, distance to roads, distance to faults, normalized different vegetation index) used to detect susceptible areas.","types":["feature set"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":32,"public_id":"7c402c1b98","public_label":"뀨 (7c402c1b98)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/7c402c1b98"},{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"},{"id":391,"public_id":"x53qfq3ny9","public_label":"kafkapple (x53qfq3ny9)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/x53qfq3ny9"},{"id":1165,"public_id":"ezd9qvkvax","public_label":"The Reverser‮ (ezd9qvkvax)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/ezd9qvkvax"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_6179ee22e99a54c1005fc5c7df70613f"},{"public_id":"co_730f58e7197b124ba7afeec69a41a689","status":"active","name":"landslide susceptibility mapping","description":"The process of mapping areas prone to landslides using GIS-based models and conditioning factors in the Shangzhou District.","types":["task"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":32,"public_id":"7c402c1b98","public_label":"뀨 (7c402c1b98)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/7c402c1b98"},{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"},{"id":391,"public_id":"x53qfq3ny9","public_label":"kafkapple (x53qfq3ny9)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/x53qfq3ny9"},{"id":1165,"public_id":"ezd9qvkvax","public_label":"The Reverser‮ (ezd9qvkvax)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/ezd9qvkvax"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_730f58e7197b124ba7afeec69a41a689"},{"public_id":"co_7a9f7da591e6b81e850e157910852e3d","status":"active","name":"DS model","description":"Dempster–Shafer model used for landslide susceptibility mapping in this study.","types":["method"],"aliases":["Dempster–Shafer model"],"contributors":[{"id":32,"public_id":"7c402c1b98","public_label":"뀨 (7c402c1b98)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/7c402c1b98"},{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"},{"id":391,"public_id":"x53qfq3ny9","public_label":"kafkapple (x53qfq3ny9)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/x53qfq3ny9"},{"id":1165,"public_id":"ezd9qvkvax","public_label":"The Reverser‮ (ezd9qvkvax)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/ezd9qvkvax"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_7a9f7da591e6b81e850e157910852e3d"},{"public_id":"co_7c43540ff0c83a3ccfe70004291f0734","status":"active","name":"training accuracy","description":"The accuracy of the landslide susceptibility map evaluated on the training dataset (70% of landslide inventory).","types":["metric"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":32,"public_id":"7c402c1b98","public_label":"뀨 (7c402c1b98)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/7c402c1b98"},{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"},{"id":391,"public_id":"x53qfq3ny9","public_label":"kafkapple (x53qfq3ny9)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/x53qfq3ny9"},{"id":1165,"public_id":"ezd9qvkvax","public_label":"The Reverser‮ (ezd9qvkvax)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/ezd9qvkvax"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_7c43540ff0c83a3ccfe70004291f0734"},{"public_id":"co_7ec2ffd87aff48a7b54ea8683e02606c","status":"active","name":"prediction accuracy","description":"The accuracy of the landslide susceptibility map evaluated on the validation dataset (30% of landslide inventory) using AUC plot.","types":["metric"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":32,"public_id":"7c402c1b98","public_label":"뀨 (7c402c1b98)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/7c402c1b98"},{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"},{"id":391,"public_id":"x53qfq3ny9","public_label":"kafkapple (x53qfq3ny9)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/x53qfq3ny9"},{"id":1165,"public_id":"ezd9qvkvax","public_label":"The Reverser‮ (ezd9qvkvax)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/ezd9qvkvax"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_7ec2ffd87aff48a7b54ea8683e02606c"},{"public_id":"co_dcc083fe160da5baef61070567c0f80f","status":"active","name":"AUC plot","description":"Area under the curve plot used to verify the prediction accuracy of the landslide susceptibility maps.","types":["evaluation method"],"aliases":["area under the curve"],"contributors":[{"id":32,"public_id":"7c402c1b98","public_label":"뀨 (7c402c1b98)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/7c402c1b98"},{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"},{"id":391,"public_id":"x53qfq3ny9","public_label":"kafkapple (x53qfq3ny9)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/x53qfq3ny9"},{"id":1165,"public_id":"ezd9qvkvax","public_label":"The Reverser‮ (ezd9qvkvax)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/ezd9qvkvax"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_dcc083fe160da5baef61070567c0f80f"},{"public_id":"co_e4e2d13ffb3661180147f46a4700afce","status":"active","name":"LR model","description":"Logistic regression model used for landslide susceptibility mapping in this study.","types":["method"],"aliases":["logistic regression model"],"contributors":[{"id":32,"public_id":"7c402c1b98","public_label":"뀨 (7c402c1b98)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/7c402c1b98"},{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"},{"id":391,"public_id":"x53qfq3ny9","public_label":"kafkapple (x53qfq3ny9)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/x53qfq3ny9"},{"id":1165,"public_id":"ezd9qvkvax","public_label":"The Reverser‮ (ezd9qvkvax)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/ezd9qvkvax"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_e4e2d13ffb3661180147f46a4700afce"},{"public_id":"co_f923099570ce47cf4f8d5b42e311aede","status":"active","name":"landslide inventory","description":"The total of 145 landslide locations identified by aerial photographs and field surveys, randomly split into training (70%) and validation (30%) sets.","types":["dataset"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":32,"public_id":"7c402c1b98","public_label":"뀨 (7c402c1b98)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/7c402c1b98"},{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"},{"id":391,"public_id":"x53qfq3ny9","public_label":"kafkapple (x53qfq3ny9)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/x53qfq3ny9"},{"id":1165,"public_id":"ezd9qvkvax","public_label":"The Reverser‮ (ezd9qvkvax)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/ezd9qvkvax"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_f923099570ce47cf4f8d5b42e311aede"}],"external_ids":{"DOI":"10.1080/10106049.2016.1140824","ArXiv":null,"PubMed":null,"PubMedCentral":null,"MAG":2259343653,"DBLP":null,"ACL":null},"open_access":{"is_open_access":false,"pdf_url":null,"landing_url":"https://sah.borca.ai/papers/130447093","source":null,"pdf_url_source":null,"license":null,"reason":"pdf_url_not_indexed"},"reference_availability":{"status":"available","references_indexed":true,"full_text_available":false,"full_text_source":null,"count_basis":"semantic_scholar_metadata","extraction_status":"not_applicable","reason":null},"source":{"provider":"episteme2","base_corpus":"semantic_scholar_dump","freshness_mode":"unknown","basis":["semantic_scholar_metadata","postgres_metadata"],"limits":["paper metadata is based on indexed upstream scholarly datasets","claims and concepts are available only for extracted papers","absence of claims or concepts means no extracted graph data is available in this response"],"status":"available","degraded":false,"degraded_reasons":[],"diagnostics":{"status":"available","degraded":false,"degraded_reasons":[],"metadata_status":"available","graph_status":"available","abstract_status":"available"},"source_flags":1},"paper_id":636722,"paper_uid":"ffe41746-8a20-45e6-9be8-27b68b362b56","canonical_identity":{"paper_id":636722,"paper_uid":"ffe41746-8a20-45e6-9be8-27b68b362b56","identity_status":"available","lookup_basis":"semantic_scholar_external_id","compatibility_path":"corpus_id"},"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/papers/130447093"}