{"corpus_id":15435791,"paper_sha":"7862b3d449995b9784a22bc323e5fb766f3ac286","doi":"10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01100.x","arxiv_id":null,"pmid":12406114,"pmcid":null,"mag_id":2092473556,"dblp_id":null,"acl_id":null,"title":"Understanding and Evaluating Qualitative Research∗","year":2002,"publication_date":"2002-12-01","venue":"Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry (Print)","journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","pages":"717 - 732","volume":"36"},"journal_issn":null,"journal_title":null,"publication_types":["Review","JournalArticle"],"pubmed_pub_types":["Journal Article","Review"],"s2_fields_of_study":["Medicine","Philosophy","Psychology","Sociology","Education"],"reference_count":71,"citation_count":2443,"influential_citation_count":121,"is_open_access":false,"arxiv_categories":null,"arxiv_license":null,"arxiv_journal_ref":null,"mesh_headings":[{"d":"Comprehension","mj":false,"qs":[{"q":"physiology","mj":true,"ui":"Q000502"}],"ui":"D032882"},{"d":"Humans","mj":false,"ui":"D006801"},{"d":"Psychiatry","mj":true,"ui":"D011570"},{"d":"Qualitative Research","mj":true,"ui":"D036301"},{"d":"Research","mj":false,"qs":[{"q":"standards","mj":true,"ui":"Q000592"}],"ui":"D012106"}],"chemicals":null,"comments_corrections":null,"source_flags":5,"s2_open_access_pdf_url":null,"s2_open_access_landing_url":null,"s2_open_access_license":null,"s2_open_access_status":null,"pmc_open_access_pdf_url":null,"pmc_open_access_landing_url":null,"pmc_open_access_license":null,"pmc_open_access_status":null,"unpaywall_open_access_pdf_url":null,"unpaywall_open_access_landing_url":null,"unpaywall_open_access_license":null,"unpaywall_open_access_status":null,"abstract":"Qualitative research aims to address questions concerned with developing an understanding of the meaning and experience dimensions of humans' lives and social worlds. Central to good qualitative research is whether the research participants' subjective meanings, actions and social contexts, as understood by them, are illuminated. This paper aims to provide beginning researchers, and those unfamiliar with qualitative research, with an orientation to the principles that inform the evaluation of the design, conduct, findings and interpretation of qualitative research. It orients the reader to two philosophical perspectives, the interpretive and critical research paradigms, which underpin both the qualitative research methodologies most often used in mental health research, and how qualitative research is evaluated. Criteria for evaluating quality are interconnected with standards for ethics in qualitative research. They include principles for good practice in the conduct of qualitative research, and for trustworthiness in the interpretation of qualitative data. The paper reviews these criteria, and discusses how they may be used to evaluate qualitative research presented in research reports. These principles also offer some guidance about the conduct of sound qualitative research for the beginner qualitative researcher.","claims":[{"public_id":"cl_c6cc6ba34d0fc8224351af6164d909da","status":"active","text":"Criteria for evaluating qualitative research quality are interconnected with standards for ethics in qualitative research.","confidence":0.92,"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_c6cc6ba34d0fc8224351af6164d909da"},{"public_id":"cl_f0a9ff7270f6e3206b87f8e369000db2","status":"active","text":"Evaluation of qualitative research should address the design, conduct, findings, and interpretation of the research.","confidence":0.93,"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_f0a9ff7270f6e3206b87f8e369000db2"},{"public_id":"cl_30bd73b100f48f1bbd9636ac0518e6e3","status":"active","text":"Interpretive and critical research paradigms underpin both commonly used qualitative research methodologies in mental health research and the way qualitative research is evaluated.","confidence":0.95,"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_30bd73b100f48f1bbd9636ac0518e6e3"},{"public_id":"cl_1fe1131b60d98305fd69f09c8604002e","status":"active","text":"Trustworthiness is a key standard for interpreting qualitative data.","confidence":0.9,"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_1fe1131b60d98305fd69f09c8604002e"}],"concepts":[{"public_id":"co_07633d201a1ae4e74906373b6a9d3f1a","status":"active","name":"qualitative research methodologies","description":"Research methods used to collect and analyze qualitative data in studies of meaning and experience.","types":["methodology"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_07633d201a1ae4e74906373b6a9d3f1a"},{"public_id":"co_5aece7879a917505f67bb2ace41dc03d","status":"active","name":"research interpretation","description":"The process of explaining and making sense of research findings.","types":["study component"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_5aece7879a917505f67bb2ace41dc03d"},{"public_id":"co_6b3b5d9315fe669268eae215036885ee","status":"active","name":"interpretive research paradigm","description":"A philosophical perspective that emphasizes understanding human meanings and interpretations.","types":["philosophical perspective"],"aliases":["interpretive paradigm"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_6b3b5d9315fe669268eae215036885ee"},{"public_id":"co_96e453dd130a3cea7ef9fdaa0e13cb64","status":"active","name":"quality criteria","description":"Standards used to judge the quality of qualitative research design, conduct, findings, and interpretation.","types":["evaluation criteria"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_96e453dd130a3cea7ef9fdaa0e13cb64"},{"public_id":"co_a75e1809c164941264c75b152dd3eecc","status":"active","name":"critical research paradigm","description":"A philosophical perspective that examines social relations, power, and context in research.","types":["philosophical perspective"],"aliases":["critical paradigm"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_a75e1809c164941264c75b152dd3eecc"},{"public_id":"co_ae121f093b7b99a53fe81cd006abce2a","status":"active","name":"research design","description":"The plan or structure used to organize a research study.","types":["study component"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_ae121f093b7b99a53fe81cd006abce2a"},{"public_id":"co_ba949edd81520d57506da108e2e4274e","status":"active","name":"qualitative data","description":"Non-numeric data such as interview, observation, or textual material used in qualitative analysis.","types":["data"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_ba949edd81520d57506da108e2e4274e"},{"public_id":"co_bdabd85f31b907dc61da34ad7c2132c6","status":"active","name":"qualitative research","description":"A research approach focused on understanding meanings, experiences, actions, and social contexts from participants' perspectives.","types":["research approach"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_bdabd85f31b907dc61da34ad7c2132c6"},{"public_id":"co_dedd4b9359a00c8618c2c02d18c2931d","status":"active","name":"mental health research","description":"Research focused on mental health phenomena, practices, and outcomes.","types":["research field"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_dedd4b9359a00c8618c2c02d18c2931d"},{"public_id":"co_df4001aa20fbbc90df3c086ff9fa7e93","status":"active","name":"trustworthiness","description":"The credibility and dependability of qualitative findings and their interpretation.","types":["evaluation standard"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_df4001aa20fbbc90df3c086ff9fa7e93"},{"public_id":"co_e062a6041fe1c67cc52014fa7d8c6023","status":"active","name":"ethics in qualitative research","description":"Ethical standards and principles governing the conduct of qualitative studies.","types":["ethical framework"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_e062a6041fe1c67cc52014fa7d8c6023"}],"external_ids":{"DOI":"10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01100.x","ArXiv":null,"PubMed":12406114,"PubMedCentral":null,"MAG":2092473556,"DBLP":null,"ACL":null},"open_access":{"is_open_access":false,"pdf_url":null,"landing_url":"https://sah.borca.ai/papers/15435791","source":null,"pdf_url_source":null,"license":null,"reason":"pdf_url_not_indexed"},"reference_availability":{"status":"available","references_indexed":true,"full_text_available":false,"full_text_source":null,"count_basis":"semantic_scholar_metadata","extraction_status":"not_applicable","reason":null},"source":{"provider":"episteme2","base_corpus":"semantic_scholar_dump","freshness_mode":"unknown","basis":["semantic_scholar_metadata","postgres_metadata"],"limits":["paper metadata is based on indexed upstream scholarly datasets","claims and concepts are available only for extracted papers","absence of claims or concepts means no extracted graph data is available in this response"],"status":"available","degraded":false,"degraded_reasons":[],"diagnostics":{"status":"available","degraded":false,"degraded_reasons":[],"metadata_status":"available","graph_status":"available","abstract_status":"available"},"source_flags":5},"paper_id":635941,"paper_uid":"98073270-9d5c-47d3-9e38-9b9c18fd4dd5","canonical_identity":{"paper_id":635941,"paper_uid":"98073270-9d5c-47d3-9e38-9b9c18fd4dd5","identity_status":"available","lookup_basis":"semantic_scholar_external_id","compatibility_path":"corpus_id"},"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/papers/15435791"}