{"corpus_id":155049406,"paper_sha":"5b63ff22277352bf9b5e013c3ce54e981350778d","doi":"10.1146/ANNUREV-POLISCI-040113-161150","arxiv_id":null,"pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"mag_id":2108930531,"dblp_id":null,"acl_id":null,"title":"Constitutional Courts in Comparative Perspective: A Theoretical Assessment","year":2015,"publication_date":"2015-05-11","venue":"","journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Political Science","pages":"167-185","volume":"18"},"journal_issn":null,"journal_title":null,"publication_types":["Review"],"pubmed_pub_types":null,"s2_fields_of_study":["Law","Economics","Political Science"],"reference_count":90,"citation_count":134,"influential_citation_count":3,"is_open_access":false,"arxiv_categories":null,"arxiv_license":null,"arxiv_journal_ref":null,"mesh_headings":null,"chemicals":null,"comments_corrections":null,"source_flags":1,"s2_open_access_pdf_url":null,"s2_open_access_landing_url":null,"s2_open_access_license":null,"s2_open_access_status":null,"pmc_open_access_pdf_url":null,"pmc_open_access_landing_url":null,"pmc_open_access_license":null,"pmc_open_access_status":null,"unpaywall_open_access_pdf_url":null,"unpaywall_open_access_landing_url":null,"unpaywall_open_access_license":null,"unpaywall_open_access_status":null,"abstract":"In many democratic polities, constitutional courts significantly shape the political landscape. Yet, how they are able to do so is a puzzle: With limited resources at their disposal, and no direct powers of enforcement, judges must rely on the willingness of executives and legislators to comply with their decisions and to respect judicial authority. This essay surveys recent literature that has explored the conditions that sustain judicial authority. I contrast explanations that highlight the benefits that independent courts can provide to other policy makers (“endogenous explanations”) with explanations that emphasize the constraints that keep executives and legislators from undermining the judiciary (“exogenous explanations”). I conclude by exploring the role of strategic judicial behavior in maintaining and expanding judicial power.","claims":[{"public_id":"cl_d2f56383d2ba3b159cf5eeae196d2bb7","status":"active","text":"Recent literature explains sustained judicial authority through both endogenous benefits to other policymakers and exogenous constraints on executives and legislators.","confidence":0.94,"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_d2f56383d2ba3b159cf5eeae196d2bb7"},{"public_id":"cl_a374baf73b6afbb109d002c0b4cd4723","status":"active","text":"Strategic judicial behavior plays a role in maintaining and expanding judicial power.","confidence":0.9,"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_a374baf73b6afbb109d002c0b4cd4723"}],"concepts":[{"public_id":"co_02807a2892ac0f6e3d5f7dec3a3479af","status":"active","name":"independent courts","description":"Courts that operate without direct control from other branches of government.","types":["institution"],"aliases":["judicial independence"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_02807a2892ac0f6e3d5f7dec3a3479af"},{"public_id":"co_0c9eba01db031dd17199818c62fba487","status":"active","name":"judicial authority","description":"The capacity of courts to have their decisions followed and their legitimacy respected by political actors.","types":["concept"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_0c9eba01db031dd17199818c62fba487"},{"public_id":"co_1701475565b766edb8c4748bd28b1663","status":"active","name":"exogenous explanations","description":"Accounts that explain judicial authority by external constraints that prevent political actors from undermining courts.","types":["theoretical explanation"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_1701475565b766edb8c4748bd28b1663"},{"public_id":"co_1ed1c81cad4a955008b087dd8714de4f","status":"active","name":"legislators","description":"Elected lawmaking actors whose actions may support or undermine judicial decisions.","types":["political actor"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_1ed1c81cad4a955008b087dd8714de4f"},{"public_id":"co_45d6e2b04b36fd89cd66017819495a6a","status":"active","name":"constitutional courts","description":"Courts with authority to interpret and apply a constitution in a democratic polity.","types":["institution"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_45d6e2b04b36fd89cd66017819495a6a"},{"public_id":"co_585b1831609b347468f313a1c26bbe6e","status":"active","name":"compliance","description":"Willingness of political actors to follow court decisions.","types":["political behavior"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_585b1831609b347468f313a1c26bbe6e"},{"public_id":"co_7682411b602ffda2edd5c02837984659","status":"active","name":"endogenous explanations","description":"Accounts that explain judicial authority by benefits independent courts provide to other policymakers.","types":["theoretical explanation"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_7682411b602ffda2edd5c02837984659"},{"public_id":"co_87c2ab897bf49c5cac01fc0942ff8365","status":"active","name":"strategic judicial behavior","description":"Judicial actions designed to preserve or extend court influence by anticipating political responses.","types":["behavior"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_87c2ab897bf49c5cac01fc0942ff8365"},{"public_id":"co_cb2ba28f2300c9611f61de53df508e31","status":"active","name":"judicial power","description":"The effective influence constitutional courts can exert within the political system.","types":["concept"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_cb2ba28f2300c9611f61de53df508e31"},{"public_id":"co_fe2bd21fcd77fd11ed9d17ef9f52b9ee","status":"active","name":"executives","description":"Government actors responsible for implementing policy and exercising executive authority.","types":["political actor"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_fe2bd21fcd77fd11ed9d17ef9f52b9ee"}],"external_ids":{"DOI":"10.1146/ANNUREV-POLISCI-040113-161150","ArXiv":null,"PubMed":null,"PubMedCentral":null,"MAG":2108930531,"DBLP":null,"ACL":null},"open_access":{"is_open_access":false,"pdf_url":null,"landing_url":"https://sah.borca.ai/papers/155049406","source":null,"pdf_url_source":null,"license":null,"reason":"pdf_url_not_indexed"},"reference_availability":{"status":"available","references_indexed":true,"full_text_available":false,"full_text_source":null,"count_basis":"semantic_scholar_metadata","extraction_status":"not_applicable","reason":null},"source":{"provider":"episteme2","base_corpus":"semantic_scholar_dump","freshness_mode":"unknown","basis":["semantic_scholar_metadata","postgres_metadata"],"limits":["paper metadata is based on indexed upstream scholarly datasets","claims and concepts are available only for extracted papers","absence of claims or concepts means no extracted graph data is available in this response"],"status":"available","degraded":false,"degraded_reasons":[],"diagnostics":{"status":"available","degraded":false,"degraded_reasons":[],"metadata_status":"available","graph_status":"available","abstract_status":"available"},"source_flags":1},"paper_id":632176,"paper_uid":"3f0987fd-6a56-4297-a4f3-d3e1bab7df1a","canonical_identity":{"paper_id":632176,"paper_uid":"3f0987fd-6a56-4297-a4f3-d3e1bab7df1a","identity_status":"available","lookup_basis":"semantic_scholar_external_id","compatibility_path":"corpus_id"},"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/papers/155049406"}