{"corpus_id":160124563,"paper_sha":"117ae1ecccf35cab649ce6099326fb97a258f678","doi":"10.1515/9783110902235","arxiv_id":null,"pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"mag_id":643816371,"dblp_id":null,"acl_id":null,"title":"\"Donation of Constantine\" and \"Constitutum Constantini\" : the misinterpretation of a fiction and its original meaning, with a contribution by Wolfram Brandes: \"The Satraps of Constantine\"","year":2007,"publication_date":"2007-01-31","venue":"","journal":{"name":"","pages":null,"volume":""},"journal_issn":null,"journal_title":null,"publication_types":[],"pubmed_pub_types":null,"s2_fields_of_study":["History"],"reference_count":0,"citation_count":105,"influential_citation_count":0,"is_open_access":false,"arxiv_categories":null,"arxiv_license":null,"arxiv_journal_ref":null,"mesh_headings":null,"chemicals":null,"comments_corrections":null,"source_flags":1,"s2_open_access_pdf_url":null,"s2_open_access_landing_url":null,"s2_open_access_license":null,"s2_open_access_status":null,"pmc_open_access_pdf_url":null,"pmc_open_access_landing_url":null,"pmc_open_access_license":null,"pmc_open_access_status":null,"unpaywall_open_access_pdf_url":null,"unpaywall_open_access_landing_url":null,"unpaywall_open_access_license":null,"unpaywall_open_access_status":null,"abstract":"The Donation of Constantine is the largest and most powerful forgery in world history. Disputed until modern times, this document was the fuel of religious war, used by both the reformation, as well as the counter-reformation. Johannes Fried not only reinterprets the origin of this forgery (i.e. he ascribes it to the Franks' opposition of Emperor Louis the Pious), but retells, as well, the history of its misinterpretation since the High Middle Ages.","claims":[{"public_id":"cl_b5b74ce811f2061c104c69b7e30de8d4","status":"active","text":"The Donation of Constantine was used by both the Reformation and the Counter-Reformation as fuel for religious conflict.","confidence":0.9,"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_b5b74ce811f2061c104c69b7e30de8d4"},{"public_id":"cl_3777d14391d4fcb33aea8d14fb32f4d4","status":"active","text":"The history of the document's misinterpretation is retold from the High Middle Ages onward.","confidence":0.87,"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_3777d14391d4fcb33aea8d14fb32f4d4"},{"public_id":"cl_1d430376c892744dfa6ff7ade3c01875","status":"active","text":"The origin of the Donation of Constantine is reinterpreted as arising from the Franks' opposition to Emperor Louis the Pious.","confidence":0.93,"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_1d430376c892744dfa6ff7ade3c01875"}],"concepts":[{"public_id":"co_0d330b442089955f8b1e49a8eec5600a","status":"active","name":"Johannes Fried","description":"The scholar whose reinterpretation and historical retelling are described in the abstract.","types":["person","scholar"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_0d330b442089955f8b1e49a8eec5600a"},{"public_id":"co_1a380e63bcf4268376275311b8907612","status":"active","name":"Constitutum Constantini","description":"The Latin name for the Donation of Constantine, a forged imperial donation text.","types":["forgery","document"],"aliases":["Donation of Constantine"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_1a380e63bcf4268376275311b8907612"},{"public_id":"co_4a6a44d6d14d46c0d7496e866c274197","status":"active","name":"Emperor Louis the Pious","description":"The Carolingian ruler whose opposition is proposed as relevant to the forgery's origin.","types":["person","emperor"],"aliases":["Louis the Pious"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_4a6a44d6d14d46c0d7496e866c274197"},{"public_id":"co_55f4dba0a010e0ebc3f7bd09ad7f11a2","status":"active","name":"Franks","description":"The Frankish political group identified here as opposing Emperor Louis the Pious in the proposed origin scenario.","types":["political group"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_55f4dba0a010e0ebc3f7bd09ad7f11a2"},{"public_id":"co_7d46d7daa9227cd077a0add8a5f7a331","status":"active","name":"Reformation","description":"The early modern religious reform movement that is said to have used the document.","types":["religious movement"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_7d46d7daa9227cd077a0add8a5f7a331"},{"public_id":"co_8252a61fe49b97070cb777a79dd629ff","status":"active","name":"misinterpretation","description":"The incorrect reading or historical understanding of the forged document discussed in the abstract.","types":["interpretive process"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_8252a61fe49b97070cb777a79dd629ff"},{"public_id":"co_926dcf339f98dd6e884c1b53464d44a7","status":"active","name":"Counter-Reformation","description":"The Catholic response to the Reformation that is said to have used the document.","types":["religious movement"],"aliases":["Counter Reformation"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_926dcf339f98dd6e884c1b53464d44a7"},{"public_id":"co_a27ed9ed2b96a1e225a60dbc8d52a4d6","status":"active","name":"High Middle Ages","description":"The medieval period from which the document's misinterpretation is traced.","types":["historical period"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_a27ed9ed2b96a1e225a60dbc8d52a4d6"},{"public_id":"co_bbb078be8e59df5aef258b29563c4c19","status":"active","name":"Donation of Constantine","description":"A forged document historically attributed to Emperor Constantine and central to later ecclesiastical-political arguments.","types":["forgery","document"],"aliases":["Constitutum Constantini"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_bbb078be8e59df5aef258b29563c4c19"},{"public_id":"co_e5bfae9f252c1c316f7575dfd6e52841","status":"active","name":"religious conflict","description":"Conflict framed in the abstract as being fueled by the forged document.","types":["conflict"],"aliases":["religious war"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_e5bfae9f252c1c316f7575dfd6e52841"}],"external_ids":{"DOI":"10.1515/9783110902235","ArXiv":null,"PubMed":null,"PubMedCentral":null,"MAG":643816371,"DBLP":null,"ACL":null},"open_access":{"is_open_access":false,"pdf_url":null,"landing_url":"https://sah.borca.ai/papers/160124563","source":null,"pdf_url_source":null,"license":null,"reason":"pdf_url_not_indexed"},"reference_availability":{"status":"unknown","references_indexed":false,"full_text_available":false,"full_text_source":null,"count_basis":"semantic_scholar_metadata","extraction_status":"not_applicable","reason":null},"source":{"provider":"episteme2","base_corpus":"semantic_scholar_dump","freshness_mode":"unknown","basis":["semantic_scholar_metadata","postgres_metadata"],"limits":["paper metadata is based on indexed upstream scholarly datasets","claims and concepts are available only for extracted papers","absence of claims or concepts means no extracted graph data is available in this response"],"status":"available","degraded":false,"degraded_reasons":[],"diagnostics":{"status":"available","degraded":false,"degraded_reasons":[],"metadata_status":"available","graph_status":"available","abstract_status":"available"},"source_flags":1},"paper_id":633865,"paper_uid":"92c95bf1-5328-4ad6-a76d-a5d0b86615c6","canonical_identity":{"paper_id":633865,"paper_uid":"92c95bf1-5328-4ad6-a76d-a5d0b86615c6","identity_status":"available","lookup_basis":"semantic_scholar_external_id","compatibility_path":"corpus_id"},"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/papers/160124563"}