{"corpus_id":17477110,"paper_sha":"9f153b1fa3cbc4616091236f9c06598de57032ae","doi":"10.1111/J.1475-6765.2009.00849.X","arxiv_id":null,"pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"mag_id":2165692775,"dblp_id":null,"acl_id":null,"title":"Spheres of trust: An empirical analysis of the foundations of particularised and generalised trust","year":2009,"publication_date":"2009-10-01","venue":"","journal":{"name":"European Journal of Political Research","pages":"782-803","volume":"48"},"journal_issn":null,"journal_title":null,"publication_types":[],"pubmed_pub_types":null,"s2_fields_of_study":["Sociology"],"reference_count":80,"citation_count":348,"influential_citation_count":19,"is_open_access":true,"arxiv_categories":null,"arxiv_license":null,"arxiv_journal_ref":null,"mesh_headings":null,"chemicals":null,"comments_corrections":null,"source_flags":1,"s2_open_access_pdf_url":"https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstreams/4e4b738d-cc89-44b7-bc8c-b82fc5d8e530/download","s2_open_access_landing_url":"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9f153b1fa3cbc4616091236f9c06598de57032ae","s2_open_access_license":"other-oa","s2_open_access_status":"GREEN","pmc_open_access_pdf_url":null,"pmc_open_access_landing_url":null,"pmc_open_access_license":null,"pmc_open_access_status":null,"unpaywall_open_access_pdf_url":null,"unpaywall_open_access_landing_url":null,"unpaywall_open_access_license":null,"unpaywall_open_access_status":null,"abstract":"Abstract While the literature on trust has produced various conceptual models, there is also some confusion concerning different types of trust and their formation. In this article, three contested points are empirically clarified. First, are there really different forms of trust as much of the literature suggests? Second, if so, then how are these different types of trust related to each other? Third, what are the foundations of these different forms of trust? Relying on data from the German Socio‐Economic Panel, it is concluded that two types of trust can be empirically identified: an intimate trust in people close to the truster, as well as an abstract trust in people in general. Although these types of trust constitute separate dimensions, they are positively related to each other. Furthermore, this article challenges the widely held assumption that experiences are most relevant for particularised trust, while generalised trust is based on psychological predispositions. It is argued instead for a sphere‐specific logic of trust formation: It is the radius of experiences and predispositions that matters for the radius of trust. Finally, the analysis goes beyond the existing research by highlighting hitherto unknown conditions under which trust in familiar domains is more or less likely to extend to generalised trust.","claims":[{"public_id":"cl_962787d0fc2a6feabf8326627ff7c5cb","status":"active","text":"The radius of experiences and predispositions matters for the radius of trust in a sphere-specific logic of trust formation.","confidence":0.93,"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_962787d0fc2a6feabf8326627ff7c5cb"},{"public_id":"cl_1cdb8144962fd56e1e068a91976c2950","status":"active","text":"These two forms of trust are separate dimensions but positively related to each other.","confidence":0.95,"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_1cdb8144962fd56e1e068a91976c2950"},{"public_id":"cl_09db5911e3d6087e393b55db32e0a7c1","status":"active","text":"Trust in familiar domains can be more or less likely to extend to generalised trust under specific conditions.","confidence":0.86,"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_09db5911e3d6087e393b55db32e0a7c1"},{"public_id":"cl_33a850d771f3f21326d72e0fef3a3d0d","status":"active","text":"Two empirically identifiable forms of trust are distinguished: intimate trust in people close to the truster and abstract trust in people in general.","confidence":0.98,"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_33a850d771f3f21326d72e0fef3a3d0d"}],"concepts":[{"public_id":"co_244df60283baa588e997a780a6bb415c","status":"active","name":"particularised trust","description":"Trust directed toward specific people or familiar social circles rather than people in general.","types":["trust type"],"aliases":["particularized trust"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_244df60283baa588e997a780a6bb415c"},{"public_id":"co_4a32bc29ccc74a080301ce3902a466fc","status":"active","name":"intimate trust","description":"Trust in people who are close to the truster.","types":["trust type"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_4a32bc29ccc74a080301ce3902a466fc"},{"public_id":"co_5331fb500d903ad7a98ca4199cb67706","status":"active","name":"conditions under which trust extends","description":"Contextual factors that affect whether trust in familiar domains generalises to broader trust.","types":["condition"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_5331fb500d903ad7a98ca4199cb67706"},{"public_id":"co_63c356d225abbd33bcbed2c87227c187","status":"active","name":"abstract trust","description":"Trust in people in general, independent of personal familiarity.","types":["trust type"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_63c356d225abbd33bcbed2c87227c187"},{"public_id":"co_6a312f75f70d4531842ef530fcd10653","status":"active","name":"trust in familiar domains","description":"Trust formed in contexts involving familiar people or settings.","types":["trust-related construct"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_6a312f75f70d4531842ef530fcd10653"},{"public_id":"co_975d0f4c198ab900b288526f126fb750","status":"active","name":"sphere-specific logic of trust formation","description":"A proposed account in which trust develops according to the matching radius of experiences and predispositions.","types":["theoretical framework"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_975d0f4c198ab900b288526f126fb750"},{"public_id":"co_b98539a2275bafd8828328bdb17ddece","status":"active","name":"radius of trust","description":"The breadth of social situations or persons toward which trust extends.","types":["theoretical construct"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_b98539a2275bafd8828328bdb17ddece"},{"public_id":"co_c9cb34bca441080534f1ac3111ca3121","status":"active","name":"radius of experiences and predispositions","description":"The scope of prior experiences and psychological predispositions considered relevant for shaping trust.","types":["theoretical construct"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_c9cb34bca441080534f1ac3111ca3121"},{"public_id":"co_f54c4b12a00e5a1cb659a02599fd38c4","status":"active","name":"German Socio-Economic Panel","description":"A longitudinal survey dataset used as the empirical basis for the analysis.","types":["dataset"],"aliases":["SOEP"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_f54c4b12a00e5a1cb659a02599fd38c4"},{"public_id":"co_f8d097be96a88f1685f88c42ddbe868e","status":"active","name":"generalised trust","description":"Trust directed toward people in general beyond known social relationships.","types":["trust type"],"aliases":["generalized trust"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_f8d097be96a88f1685f88c42ddbe868e"}],"external_ids":{"DOI":"10.1111/J.1475-6765.2009.00849.X","ArXiv":null,"PubMed":null,"PubMedCentral":null,"MAG":2165692775,"DBLP":null,"ACL":null},"open_access":{"is_open_access":true,"pdf_url":"https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstreams/4e4b738d-cc89-44b7-bc8c-b82fc5d8e530/download","landing_url":"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9f153b1fa3cbc4616091236f9c06598de57032ae","source":"semantic_scholar","pdf_url_source":"semantic_scholar_open_access_pdf","license":"other-oa","status":"GREEN","reason":null},"reference_availability":{"status":"available","references_indexed":true,"full_text_available":false,"full_text_source":null,"count_basis":"semantic_scholar_metadata","extraction_status":"not_applicable","reason":null},"source":{"provider":"episteme2","base_corpus":"semantic_scholar_dump","freshness_mode":"unknown","basis":["semantic_scholar_metadata","postgres_metadata"],"limits":["paper metadata is based on indexed upstream scholarly datasets","claims and concepts are available only for extracted papers","absence of claims or concepts means no extracted graph data is available in this response"],"status":"available","degraded":false,"degraded_reasons":[],"diagnostics":{"status":"available","degraded":false,"degraded_reasons":[],"metadata_status":"available","graph_status":"available","abstract_status":"available"},"source_flags":1},"paper_id":632906,"paper_uid":"1a736a51-d95b-4a09-8caf-51ab7682016d","canonical_identity":{"paper_id":632906,"paper_uid":"1a736a51-d95b-4a09-8caf-51ab7682016d","identity_status":"available","lookup_basis":"semantic_scholar_external_id","compatibility_path":"corpus_id"},"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/papers/17477110"}