{"corpus_id":229421730,"paper_sha":"ab5124fcc2d96c8e79cfc395e7b178335ceeb44c","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2020.100635","arxiv_id":null,"pmid":33732960,"pmcid":"7940795","mag_id":3108807922,"dblp_id":null,"acl_id":null,"title":"The Reality of Randomized Controlled Trials for Assessing the Benefit of Proton Therapy: Critically Examining the Intent-to-Treat Principle in the Presence of Insurance Denial","year":2020,"publication_date":"2020-12-02","venue":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","pages":null,"volume":"6"},"journal_issn":null,"journal_title":null,"publication_types":["Review","JournalArticle"],"pubmed_pub_types":["Journal Article","Review"],"s2_fields_of_study":["Medicine"],"reference_count":30,"citation_count":8,"influential_citation_count":1,"is_open_access":true,"arxiv_categories":null,"arxiv_license":null,"arxiv_journal_ref":null,"mesh_headings":null,"chemicals":null,"comments_corrections":null,"source_flags":5,"s2_open_access_pdf_url":"http://www.advancesradonc.org/article/S2452109420303651/pdf","s2_open_access_landing_url":"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ab5124fcc2d96c8e79cfc395e7b178335ceeb44c","s2_open_access_license":"CCBYNCND","s2_open_access_status":"GOLD","pmc_open_access_pdf_url":null,"pmc_open_access_landing_url":null,"pmc_open_access_license":null,"pmc_open_access_status":null,"unpaywall_open_access_pdf_url":null,"unpaywall_open_access_landing_url":null,"unpaywall_open_access_license":null,"unpaywall_open_access_status":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study hypothesized that insurance denial would lead to bias and loss of statistical power when evaluating the results from an intent-to-treat (ITT), per-protocol, and as-treated analyses using a simulated randomized clinical trial comparing proton therapy to intensity modulated radiation therapy where patients incurred increasing rates of insurance denial. Methods and Materials Simulations used a binary endpoint to assess differences between treatment arms after applying ITT, per-protocol, and as-treated analyses. Two scenarios were developed: 1 with clinical success independent of age and another assuming dependence on age. Insurance denial was assumed possible for patients <65 years. All scenarios considered an age distribution with mean ± standard deviation: 55 ± 15 years, rates of insurance denial ranging from 0%-40%, and a sample of N = 300 patients (150 per arm). Clinical success rates were defined as 70% for proton therapy and 50% for intensity modulated radiation therapy. The average treatment effect, bias, and power were compared after applying 5000 simulations. Results Increasing rates of insurance denial demonstrated inherent weaknesses among all 3 analytical approaches. With clinical success independent of age, a per-protocol analysis demonstrated the least bias and loss of power. When clinical success was dependent on age, the per-protocol and ITT analyses resulted in a similar trend with respect to bias and loss of power, with both outperforming the as-treated analysis. Conclusions Insurance denial leads to misclassification bias in the ITT analysis, a missing data problem in the per-protocol analysis, and covariate imbalance between treatment arms in the as-treated analysis. Moreover, insurance denial forces the critical appraisal of patient features (eg, age) affected by the denial and potentially influencing clinical success. In the presence of insurance denial, our study suggests cautious reporting of ITT and as-treated analyses, and placing primary emphasis on the results of the per-protocol analysis.","claims":[{"public_id":"cl_d450afcb4bf22d16b65c91105800cb5f","status":"active","text":"In the presence of insurance denial, primary emphasis should be placed on per-protocol results, with cautious reporting of intent-to-treat and as-treated analyses.","confidence":0.89,"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_d450afcb4bf22d16b65c91105800cb5f"},{"public_id":"cl_22e876fa38a35ff5fef2b6a13336b8bc","status":"active","text":"Increasing rates of insurance denial produce bias and loss of statistical power across intent-to-treat, per-protocol, and as-treated analyses in the simulated proton therapy trial.","confidence":0.98,"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_22e876fa38a35ff5fef2b6a13336b8bc"},{"public_id":"cl_38558e7850197213921d48b7defbb11c","status":"active","text":"Insurance denial induces misclassification bias in intent-to-treat analysis, missing data problems in per-protocol analysis, and covariate imbalance in as-treated analysis.","confidence":0.97,"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_38558e7850197213921d48b7defbb11c"},{"public_id":"cl_ede4dc9a82657351241c675ce2454972","status":"active","text":"When clinical success depends on age, per-protocol and intent-to-treat analyses show similar bias and power trends and both outperform as-treated analysis.","confidence":0.9,"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_ede4dc9a82657351241c675ce2454972"},{"public_id":"cl_9df1a77841d410a5b62c455a79517baa","status":"active","text":"When clinical success is independent of age, per-protocol analysis shows the least bias and the smallest loss of power.","confidence":0.93,"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_9df1a77841d410a5b62c455a79517baa"}],"concepts":[{"public_id":"co_0678a11bbdd35ae847e5be3b702c4136","status":"active","name":"intent-to-treat analysis","description":"An analysis that evaluates participants according to their originally assigned treatment groups regardless of treatment received.","types":["analysis method"],"aliases":["ITT analysis","ITT"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_0678a11bbdd35ae847e5be3b702c4136"},{"public_id":"co_165fb43a02f543a0a8736ea76ef214e5","status":"active","name":"covariate imbalance","description":"Unequal distribution of patient characteristics between treatment groups.","types":["study design issue"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_165fb43a02f543a0a8736ea76ef214e5"},{"public_id":"co_27aa44f80e8274b27d65afc9ebc8a945","status":"active","name":"per-protocol analysis","description":"An analysis that includes participants according to the treatment actually received and protocol adherence.","types":["analysis method"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_27aa44f80e8274b27d65afc9ebc8a945"},{"public_id":"co_484d92d6c6ff7c1edbb41ff6075950c5","status":"active","name":"proton therapy","description":"A radiation therapy modality evaluated as one arm of the simulated randomized trial.","types":["treatment"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_484d92d6c6ff7c1edbb41ff6075950c5"},{"public_id":"co_66bf974f56fafdfda73779ace9968b0c","status":"active","name":"statistical power","description":"The probability that an analysis detects a treatment effect when one is present.","types":["statistical property"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_66bf974f56fafdfda73779ace9968b0c"},{"public_id":"co_6d7de099f6653b9117b2d919a3a3ff66","status":"active","name":"clinical success","description":"The binary outcome used in the simulations to compare treatment arms.","types":["outcome"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_6d7de099f6653b9117b2d919a3a3ff66"},{"public_id":"co_6fb7e71cdd8a8b36b2f625f6e766e6cf","status":"active","name":"age","description":"A patient characteristic considered in the simulation and in the age-dependent scenario.","types":["covariate"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_6fb7e71cdd8a8b36b2f625f6e766e6cf"},{"public_id":"co_723615cfdaefa24af0bf546009ca8456","status":"active","name":"as-treated analysis","description":"An analysis that assigns participants based on the treatment they ultimately received.","types":["analysis method"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_723615cfdaefa24af0bf546009ca8456"},{"public_id":"co_75320b6d807d82b74591e3f31217bef3","status":"active","name":"intensity modulated radiation therapy","description":"A radiation therapy modality used as the comparison arm in the simulated randomized trial.","types":["treatment"],"aliases":["IMRT"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_75320b6d807d82b74591e3f31217bef3"},{"public_id":"co_8d5699d1af7ff7acaccb030f5d553606","status":"active","name":"insurance denial","description":"Refusal of insurance coverage for a treatment, here affecting access to proton therapy for some patients.","types":["study condition"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_8d5699d1af7ff7acaccb030f5d553606"},{"public_id":"co_c811957b360690bf1146a9202745f4c4","status":"active","name":"misclassification bias","description":"Systematic error arising when individuals are assigned to the wrong analysis or exposure group.","types":["bias"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_c811957b360690bf1146a9202745f4c4"},{"public_id":"co_e2d163f8eddd28588e84fb2a4dae5158","status":"active","name":"missing data problem","description":"An analytic issue caused by unavailable outcome or covariate information for some participants.","types":["data issue"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_e2d163f8eddd28588e84fb2a4dae5158"}],"external_ids":{"DOI":"10.1016/j.adro.2020.100635","ArXiv":null,"PubMed":33732960,"PubMedCentral":"7940795","MAG":3108807922,"DBLP":null,"ACL":null},"open_access":{"is_open_access":true,"pdf_url":"http://www.advancesradonc.org/article/S2452109420303651/pdf","landing_url":"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ab5124fcc2d96c8e79cfc395e7b178335ceeb44c","source":"semantic_scholar","pdf_url_source":"semantic_scholar_open_access_pdf","license":"CCBYNCND","status":"GOLD","reason":null},"reference_availability":{"status":"available","references_indexed":true,"full_text_available":false,"full_text_source":null,"count_basis":"semantic_scholar_metadata","extraction_status":"not_applicable","reason":null},"source":{"provider":"episteme2","base_corpus":"semantic_scholar_dump","freshness_mode":"unknown","basis":["semantic_scholar_metadata","postgres_metadata"],"limits":["paper metadata is based on indexed upstream scholarly datasets","claims and concepts are available only for extracted papers","absence of claims or concepts means no extracted graph data is available in this response"],"status":"available","degraded":false,"degraded_reasons":[],"diagnostics":{"status":"available","degraded":false,"degraded_reasons":[],"metadata_status":"available","graph_status":"available","abstract_status":"available"},"source_flags":5},"paper_id":634849,"paper_uid":"ae8495dd-3703-4a75-83ee-44a2725d86e3","canonical_identity":{"paper_id":634849,"paper_uid":"ae8495dd-3703-4a75-83ee-44a2725d86e3","identity_status":"available","lookup_basis":"semantic_scholar_external_id","compatibility_path":"corpus_id"},"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/papers/229421730"}