{"corpus_id":26306789,"paper_sha":"7be768aa037a9091c8993659334959bb08eee765","doi":"10.1083/jcb.201304162","arxiv_id":null,"pmid":23690180,"pmcid":"3664712","mag_id":2152137621,"dblp_id":null,"acl_id":null,"title":"Eliminating the impact of the Impact Factor","year":2013,"publication_date":"2013-05-27","venue":"Journal of Cell Biology","journal":{"name":"The Journal of Cell Biology","pages":"651 - 652","volume":"201"},"journal_issn":null,"journal_title":null,"publication_types":["Editorial"],"pubmed_pub_types":["Editorial"],"s2_fields_of_study":["Biology","Medicine"],"reference_count":1,"citation_count":33,"influential_citation_count":2,"is_open_access":true,"arxiv_categories":null,"arxiv_license":null,"arxiv_journal_ref":null,"mesh_headings":[{"d":"Journal Impact Factor","mj":true,"ui":"D055811"},{"d":"Professional Competence","mj":true,"ui":"D011361"},{"d":"Research","mj":false,"qs":[{"q":"standards","mj":false,"ui":"Q000592"},{"q":"statistics & numerical data","mj":false,"ui":"Q000706"}],"ui":"D012106"}],"chemicals":null,"comments_corrections":null,"source_flags":5,"s2_open_access_pdf_url":"http://jcb.rupress.org/content/jcb/201/5/651.full.pdf","s2_open_access_landing_url":"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7be768aa037a9091c8993659334959bb08eee765","s2_open_access_license":"CCBYNCSA","s2_open_access_status":"HYBRID","pmc_open_access_pdf_url":null,"pmc_open_access_landing_url":null,"pmc_open_access_license":null,"pmc_open_access_status":null,"unpaywall_open_access_pdf_url":null,"unpaywall_open_access_landing_url":null,"unpaywall_open_access_license":null,"unpaywall_open_access_status":null,"abstract":"The Impact Factor is the most popular numerical measure of a scientist’s work. Despite many well-documented flaws, the Impact Factor is commonly used in recruitment, appointment, and funding decisions. A diverse group of stakeholders is now making a concerted effort to combat misuse of the Impact","claims":[{"public_id":"cl_067d0c04ab325d945fc6d3d908474d72","status":"active","text":"Misuse of the Impact Factor in recruitment, appointment, and funding decisions is being actively challenged by a diverse group of stakeholders.","confidence":0.95,"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_067d0c04ab325d945fc6d3d908474d72"},{"public_id":"cl_95f1a0b574eb8c0ca5c5f6bb9fa591a0","status":"active","text":"The Impact Factor is widely used as a numerical measure of a scientist’s work despite having many well-documented flaws.","confidence":0.94,"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_95f1a0b574eb8c0ca5c5f6bb9fa591a0"}],"concepts":[{"public_id":"co_1a8c8942cde040d2dbc2af0360777ed5","status":"active","name":"stakeholders","description":"The diverse parties involved in science assessment and publication practices.","types":["group"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_1a8c8942cde040d2dbc2af0360777ed5"},{"public_id":"co_2d8a914fd5fd17d630eab7422b6c35d3","status":"active","name":"Impact Factor","description":"A numerical journal-based metric that is used here as an indicator of a scientist’s work.","types":["metric"],"aliases":["IF"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_2d8a914fd5fd17d630eab7422b6c35d3"},{"public_id":"co_442d91768281c4380ceaff3361e11c54","status":"active","name":"well-documented flaws","description":"Recognized shortcomings associated with the Impact Factor as a measure.","types":["limitation"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_442d91768281c4380ceaff3361e11c54"},{"public_id":"co_6120fb74a21e242cbadac14711ea69a9","status":"active","name":"recruitment, appointment, and funding decisions","description":"Institutional decisions in hiring, academic appointment, and allocation of research funding.","types":["decision process"],"aliases":["recruitment decisions","appointment decisions","funding decisions"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_6120fb74a21e242cbadac14711ea69a9"},{"public_id":"co_d1ddd3ed402740c752e282cfbbe6d5a0","status":"active","name":"scientist’s work","description":"The scholarly output or research performance attributed to a scientist.","types":["research output"],"aliases":["scientist's work"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_d1ddd3ed402740c752e282cfbbe6d5a0"}],"external_ids":{"DOI":"10.1083/jcb.201304162","ArXiv":null,"PubMed":23690180,"PubMedCentral":"3664712","MAG":2152137621,"DBLP":null,"ACL":null},"open_access":{"is_open_access":true,"pdf_url":"http://jcb.rupress.org/content/jcb/201/5/651.full.pdf","landing_url":"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7be768aa037a9091c8993659334959bb08eee765","source":"semantic_scholar","pdf_url_source":"semantic_scholar_open_access_pdf","license":"CCBYNCSA","status":"HYBRID","reason":null},"reference_availability":{"status":"available","references_indexed":true,"full_text_available":false,"full_text_source":null,"count_basis":"semantic_scholar_metadata","extraction_status":"not_applicable","reason":null},"source":{"provider":"episteme2","base_corpus":"semantic_scholar_dump","freshness_mode":"unknown","basis":["semantic_scholar_metadata","postgres_metadata"],"limits":["paper metadata is based on indexed upstream scholarly datasets","claims and concepts are available only for extracted papers","absence of claims or concepts means no extracted graph data is available in this response"],"status":"available","degraded":false,"degraded_reasons":[],"diagnostics":{"status":"available","degraded":false,"degraded_reasons":[],"metadata_status":"available","graph_status":"available","abstract_status":"available"},"source_flags":5},"paper_id":630734,"paper_uid":"926586f5-10cd-4b39-81cc-35d1988f1d19","canonical_identity":{"paper_id":630734,"paper_uid":"926586f5-10cd-4b39-81cc-35d1988f1d19","identity_status":"available","lookup_basis":"semantic_scholar_external_id","compatibility_path":"corpus_id"},"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/papers/26306789"}