{"corpus_id":267421267,"paper_sha":"b5cb8ac4b7110a59803a2ff4bd4109c24cdd67c4","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2024.01.015","arxiv_id":null,"pmid":38316357,"pmcid":null,"mag_id":null,"dblp_id":null,"acl_id":null,"title":"Social Decision-Making Analysis: a general approach to inform decisions on resources in the public sector.","year":2024,"publication_date":"2024-02-01","venue":"Value in Health","journal":{"name":"Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research","pages":null,"volume":null},"journal_issn":null,"journal_title":null,"publication_types":["JournalArticle"],"pubmed_pub_types":["Journal Article","Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't"],"s2_fields_of_study":["Medicine","Economics","Political Science"],"reference_count":0,"citation_count":6,"influential_citation_count":0,"is_open_access":false,"arxiv_categories":null,"arxiv_license":null,"arxiv_journal_ref":null,"mesh_headings":[{"d":"Humans","mj":false,"ui":"D006801"},{"d":"Public Sector","mj":true,"qs":[{"q":"economics","mj":false,"ui":"Q000191"}],"ui":"D017150"},{"d":"Cost-Benefit Analysis","mj":true,"ui":"D003362"},{"d":"Decision Making","mj":true,"ui":"D003657"},{"d":"Social Welfare","mj":false,"qs":[{"q":"economics","mj":false,"ui":"Q000191"}],"ui":"D012946"},{"d":"United Kingdom","mj":false,"ui":"D006113"},{"d":"Resource Allocation","mj":false,"qs":[{"q":"economics","mj":false,"ui":"Q000191"}],"ui":"D040841"},{"d":"Health Expenditures","mj":false,"ui":"D005102"}],"chemicals":null,"comments_corrections":null,"source_flags":5,"s2_open_access_pdf_url":null,"s2_open_access_landing_url":null,"s2_open_access_license":null,"s2_open_access_status":null,"pmc_open_access_pdf_url":null,"pmc_open_access_landing_url":null,"pmc_open_access_license":null,"pmc_open_access_status":null,"unpaywall_open_access_pdf_url":null,"unpaywall_open_access_landing_url":null,"unpaywall_open_access_license":null,"unpaywall_open_access_status":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\nPublic expenditure aims to achieve social objectives by improving a range of socially valuable attributes of benefit (arguments in a social welfare function). Public expenditure is typically allocated to public sector budgets, where budget holders are tasked with meeting a subset of social objectives.\n\n\nMETHODS\nDecision makers require an evidence-based assessment of whether a proposed investment is likely to be worthwhile given existing levels of public expenditure. However, others also require some assessment of whether the overall level and allocation of public expenditure is appropriate. This paper proposes a more general theoretical framework for economic evaluation that addresses both these questions.\n\n\nRESULTS\nUsing a stylised example of the economic evaluation of a new intervention in a simplified UK context, we show that this more general framework can support decisions beyond the approval or rejection of single projects. It shows that broader considerations about the level and allocation of public expenditure are possible and necessary when evaluating specific investments, which requires evidence of the range of benefits offered by marginal changes in different types of public expenditure and normative choices of how the attributes of benefit gained and forgone are valued.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe proposed framework shows how to assess the value of a proposed investment as well as whether and how the overall level of public expenditure and its allocation across public sector budgets might be changed. It highlights that cost-benefit analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis can be viewed as special cases of this framework, identifying the weakness with each.","claims":[{"public_id":"cl_b2847fbfac9618161523524b5162da48","status":"active","text":"Broader considerations about the level and allocation of public expenditure are possible and necessary when evaluating specific investments, requiring evidence of the range of benefits offered by marginal changes in different types of public expenditure and normative choices of how the attributes of benefit gained and forgone are valued.","confidence":0.85,"contributors":[{"id":2,"public_id":"4715169a40","public_label":"AK (4715169a40)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/4715169a40"},{"id":1165,"public_id":"ezd9qvkvax","public_label":"The Reverser‮ (ezd9qvkvax)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/ezd9qvkvax"},{"id":17,"public_id":"322360f1c1","public_label":"Killer Whale (322360f1c1)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/322360f1c1"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_b2847fbfac9618161523524b5162da48"},{"public_id":"cl_b9d230ec1267aa74dbaebc31ebdaa3ce","status":"active","text":"Cost-benefit analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis can be viewed as special cases of the proposed framework, which identifies weaknesses with each.","confidence":0.9,"contributors":[{"id":2,"public_id":"4715169a40","public_label":"AK (4715169a40)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/4715169a40"},{"id":1165,"public_id":"ezd9qvkvax","public_label":"The Reverser‮ (ezd9qvkvax)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/ezd9qvkvax"},{"id":17,"public_id":"322360f1c1","public_label":"Killer Whale (322360f1c1)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/322360f1c1"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_b9d230ec1267aa74dbaebc31ebdaa3ce"},{"public_id":"cl_6d12b51c3c63adcd701ac01809e6dfd3","status":"active","text":"The proposed general framework for economic evaluation supports decisions beyond the approval or rejection of single projects, enabling assessment of whether the overall level and allocation of public expenditure is appropriate.","confidence":0.9,"contributors":[{"id":2,"public_id":"4715169a40","public_label":"AK (4715169a40)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/4715169a40"},{"id":1165,"public_id":"ezd9qvkvax","public_label":"The Reverser‮ (ezd9qvkvax)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/ezd9qvkvax"},{"id":17,"public_id":"322360f1c1","public_label":"Killer Whale (322360f1c1)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/322360f1c1"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_6d12b51c3c63adcd701ac01809e6dfd3"}],"concepts":[{"public_id":"co_3ab5a3278f3beac90fd05f72d506ed0b","status":"active","name":"marginal changes","description":"Small adjustments in different types of public expenditure whose range of benefits is evaluated in the proposed framework.","types":["concept"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":2,"public_id":"4715169a40","public_label":"AK (4715169a40)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/4715169a40"},{"id":1165,"public_id":"ezd9qvkvax","public_label":"The Reverser‮ (ezd9qvkvax)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/ezd9qvkvax"},{"id":17,"public_id":"322360f1c1","public_label":"Killer Whale (322360f1c1)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/322360f1c1"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_3ab5a3278f3beac90fd05f72d506ed0b"},{"public_id":"co_5c502af0823a9f3857c21955fc1e5f6b","status":"active","name":"general framework for economic evaluation","description":"A theoretical framework proposed in this paper that addresses both the assessment of a proposed investment and the appropriateness of the overall level and allocation of public expenditure.","types":["method","framework"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":2,"public_id":"4715169a40","public_label":"AK (4715169a40)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/4715169a40"},{"id":1165,"public_id":"ezd9qvkvax","public_label":"The Reverser‮ (ezd9qvkvax)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/ezd9qvkvax"},{"id":17,"public_id":"322360f1c1","public_label":"Killer Whale (322360f1c1)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/322360f1c1"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_5c502af0823a9f3857c21955fc1e5f6b"},{"public_id":"co_5ed51ca83260ce564607cf76b3a4d678","status":"active","name":"public sector budgets","description":"Budgets allocated to public sector entities, where budget holders are tasked with meeting a subset of social objectives.","types":["concept"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":2,"public_id":"4715169a40","public_label":"AK (4715169a40)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/4715169a40"},{"id":1165,"public_id":"ezd9qvkvax","public_label":"The Reverser‮ (ezd9qvkvax)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/ezd9qvkvax"},{"id":17,"public_id":"322360f1c1","public_label":"Killer Whale (322360f1c1)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/322360f1c1"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_5ed51ca83260ce564607cf76b3a4d678"},{"public_id":"co_6a9dd5dda66cd749eee82079778734aa","status":"active","name":"social welfare function","description":"A function that aggregates socially valuable attributes of benefit, used as the basis for evaluating public expenditure in the proposed framework.","types":["concept"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":2,"public_id":"4715169a40","public_label":"AK (4715169a40)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/4715169a40"},{"id":1165,"public_id":"ezd9qvkvax","public_label":"The Reverser‮ (ezd9qvkvax)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/ezd9qvkvax"},{"id":17,"public_id":"322360f1c1","public_label":"Killer Whale (322360f1c1)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/322360f1c1"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_6a9dd5dda66cd749eee82079778734aa"},{"public_id":"co_8c2e87beb9b5ddee99880be1598b0451","status":"active","name":"attributes of benefit","description":"Socially valuable attributes of benefit that are arguments in a social welfare function and are gained or forgone through public expenditure decisions.","types":["concept"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":2,"public_id":"4715169a40","public_label":"AK (4715169a40)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/4715169a40"},{"id":1165,"public_id":"ezd9qvkvax","public_label":"The Reverser‮ (ezd9qvkvax)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/ezd9qvkvax"},{"id":17,"public_id":"322360f1c1","public_label":"Killer Whale (322360f1c1)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/322360f1c1"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_8c2e87beb9b5ddee99880be1598b0451"},{"public_id":"co_9d08ffabc6ca273df0eea880dafe69a2","status":"active","name":"cost-effectiveness analysis","description":"An economic evaluation method that is identified as a special case of the proposed general framework.","types":["method"],"aliases":["CEA"],"contributors":[{"id":2,"public_id":"4715169a40","public_label":"AK (4715169a40)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/4715169a40"},{"id":1165,"public_id":"ezd9qvkvax","public_label":"The Reverser‮ (ezd9qvkvax)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/ezd9qvkvax"},{"id":17,"public_id":"322360f1c1","public_label":"Killer Whale (322360f1c1)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/322360f1c1"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_9d08ffabc6ca273df0eea880dafe69a2"},{"public_id":"co_d073e9c41ce5ceb962f964f61b7a70ae","status":"active","name":"cost-benefit analysis","description":"An economic evaluation method that is identified as a special case of the proposed general framework.","types":["method"],"aliases":["CBA"],"contributors":[{"id":2,"public_id":"4715169a40","public_label":"AK (4715169a40)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/4715169a40"},{"id":1165,"public_id":"ezd9qvkvax","public_label":"The Reverser‮ (ezd9qvkvax)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/ezd9qvkvax"},{"id":17,"public_id":"322360f1c1","public_label":"Killer Whale (322360f1c1)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/322360f1c1"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_d073e9c41ce5ceb962f964f61b7a70ae"},{"public_id":"co_eb3444c4c33e00fff352fef3c8fabe38","status":"active","name":"public expenditure","description":"Government spending allocated to public sector budgets to achieve social objectives by improving socially valuable attributes of benefit.","types":["concept","resource"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":2,"public_id":"4715169a40","public_label":"AK (4715169a40)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/4715169a40"},{"id":1165,"public_id":"ezd9qvkvax","public_label":"The Reverser‮ (ezd9qvkvax)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/ezd9qvkvax"},{"id":17,"public_id":"322360f1c1","public_label":"Killer Whale (322360f1c1)","roles":["review"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/322360f1c1"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_eb3444c4c33e00fff352fef3c8fabe38"}],"external_ids":{"DOI":"10.1016/j.jval.2024.01.015","ArXiv":null,"PubMed":38316357,"PubMedCentral":null,"MAG":null,"DBLP":null,"ACL":null},"open_access":{"is_open_access":false,"pdf_url":null,"landing_url":"https://sah.borca.ai/papers/267421267","source":null,"pdf_url_source":null,"license":null,"reason":"pdf_url_not_indexed"},"reference_availability":{"status":"unknown","references_indexed":false,"full_text_available":false,"full_text_source":null,"count_basis":"semantic_scholar_metadata","extraction_status":"not_applicable","reason":null},"source":{"provider":"episteme2","base_corpus":"semantic_scholar_dump","freshness_mode":"unknown","basis":["semantic_scholar_metadata","postgres_metadata"],"limits":["paper metadata is based on indexed upstream scholarly datasets","claims and concepts are available only for extracted papers","absence of claims or concepts means no extracted graph data is available in this response"],"status":"available","degraded":false,"degraded_reasons":[],"diagnostics":{"status":"available","degraded":false,"degraded_reasons":[],"metadata_status":"available","graph_status":"available","abstract_status":"available"},"source_flags":5},"paper_id":632971,"paper_uid":"c3d59a5b-d9c6-45fe-842f-397c1d16cd90","canonical_identity":{"paper_id":632971,"paper_uid":"c3d59a5b-d9c6-45fe-842f-397c1d16cd90","identity_status":"available","lookup_basis":"semantic_scholar_external_id","compatibility_path":"corpus_id"},"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/papers/267421267"}