{"corpus_id":43388103,"paper_sha":"90898a02dc184259cbf13b543f58d7d4dac6f346","doi":"10.1590/1518-8345.2354.2975","arxiv_id":null,"pmid":29267546,"pmcid":"5738959","mag_id":2776741078,"dblp_id":null,"acl_id":null,"title":"Validation of the MISSCARE-BRASIL survey - A tool to assess missed nursing care 1","year":2017,"publication_date":"2017-12-21","venue":"Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem","journal":{"name":"Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem","pages":null,"volume":"25"},"journal_issn":null,"journal_title":null,"publication_types":["Study","JournalArticle","Review"],"pubmed_pub_types":["Journal Article","Validation Study"],"s2_fields_of_study":["Medicine","Psychology"],"reference_count":12,"citation_count":32,"influential_citation_count":3,"is_open_access":true,"arxiv_categories":null,"arxiv_license":null,"arxiv_journal_ref":null,"mesh_headings":[{"d":"Adult","mj":false,"ui":"D000328"},{"d":"Brazil","mj":false,"ui":"D001938"},{"d":"Cross-Sectional Studies","mj":false,"ui":"D003430"},{"d":"Female","mj":false,"ui":"D005260"},{"d":"Health Care Surveys","mj":true,"ui":"D019538"},{"d":"Humans","mj":false,"ui":"D006801"},{"d":"Male","mj":false,"ui":"D008297"},{"d":"Nursing Care","mj":false,"qs":[{"q":"statistics & numerical data","mj":true,"ui":"Q000706"}],"ui":"D009732"},{"d":"Nursing Methodology Research","mj":false,"ui":"D015404"}],"chemicals":null,"comments_corrections":null,"source_flags":5,"s2_open_access_pdf_url":"http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rlae/v25/0104-1169-rlae-25-e2975.pdf","s2_open_access_landing_url":"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/90898a02dc184259cbf13b543f58d7d4dac6f346","s2_open_access_license":"CCBY","s2_open_access_status":"GOLD","pmc_open_access_pdf_url":null,"pmc_open_access_landing_url":null,"pmc_open_access_license":null,"pmc_open_access_status":null,"unpaywall_open_access_pdf_url":null,"unpaywall_open_access_landing_url":null,"unpaywall_open_access_license":null,"unpaywall_open_access_status":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective: to analyze the metric validity and reliability properties of the MISSCARE-BRASIL survey. Method: methodological research conducted by assessing construct validity and reliability via confirmatory factor analysis, known-groups validation, convergent construct validation, analysis of internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The sample consisted of 330 nursing professionals, of whom 86 participated in the retest phase. Results: of the 330 participants, 39.7% were aides, 33% technicians, 20.9% nurses, and 6.4% nurses with administrative roles. Confirmatory factorial analysis demonstrated that the Brazilian Portuguese version of the instrument is adequately adjusted to the dimensional structure the scale authors originally proposed. The correlation between “satisfaction with position/role” and “satisfaction with teamwork” and the survey’s missed care variables was moderate (Spearman’s coefficient =0.35; p<0.001). The results of the Student’s t-test indicated known-group validity. Professionals from closed units reported lower levels of missed care in comparison with the other units. The reliability showed a strong correlation, with the exception of “institutional management/leadership style” (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)=0.15; p=0.04). The internal consistency was adequate (Cronbach’s alpha was greater than 0.70). Conclusion: the MISSCARE-BRASIL was valid and reliable in the group studied. The application of the MISSCARE-BRASIL can contribute to identifying solutions for missed nursing care.","claims":[{"public_id":"cl_506ef99fe3b8287d415cf125be1ee4d4","status":"active","text":"Internal consistency was adequate, with Cronbach's alpha above 0.70.","confidence":0.96,"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_506ef99fe3b8287d415cf125be1ee4d4"},{"public_id":"cl_8fc19bf980ee15335d0f878481ed4a99","status":"active","text":"Known-groups validity was supported, with professionals from closed units reporting lower levels of missed care than those from other units.","confidence":0.95,"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_8fc19bf980ee15335d0f878481ed4a99"},{"public_id":"cl_817ae89d10d03385f2ea1e7c20bdbc99","status":"active","text":"MISSCARE-BRASIL was valid and reliable in the studied group.","confidence":0.97,"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_817ae89d10d03385f2ea1e7c20bdbc99"},{"public_id":"cl_88bcfe14fb91df21ea622dff81d6f68e","status":"active","text":"Test-retest reliability was strong overall, except for the 'institutional management/leadership style' dimension, which showed low stability.","confidence":0.92,"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_88bcfe14fb91df21ea622dff81d6f68e"},{"public_id":"cl_5ae56cca4609d977939762f006438ee4","status":"active","text":"The Brazilian Portuguese version matches the originally proposed dimensional structure of the MISSCARE survey.","confidence":0.98,"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_5ae56cca4609d977939762f006438ee4"}],"concepts":[{"public_id":"co_0ebeb9e08cb5045682a90217fe374039","status":"active","name":"reliability","description":"The degree to which an instrument produces consistent results.","types":["measurement property"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_0ebeb9e08cb5045682a90217fe374039"},{"public_id":"co_23ecb39bd602844b9b86063d78d833b6","status":"active","name":"closed units","description":"Hospital units with restricted access or controlled patient flow, used here as a comparison group.","types":["clinical setting"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_23ecb39bd602844b9b86063d78d833b6"},{"public_id":"co_379e06c9f29dec2b73383ec7547a39d0","status":"active","name":"test-retest reliability","description":"The stability of instrument scores when the same respondents complete it at different times.","types":["reliability"],"aliases":["retest reliability"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_379e06c9f29dec2b73383ec7547a39d0"},{"public_id":"co_3dd5285cc17afd4e26f2101744988429","status":"active","name":"intraclass correlation coefficient","description":"A statistic used to assess agreement or stability between repeated measurements.","types":["reliability coefficient"],"aliases":["ICC"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_3dd5285cc17afd4e26f2101744988429"},{"public_id":"co_5640511988e4a731d9a9c3ff0ff91f39","status":"active","name":"dimensional structure","description":"The underlying set of latent dimensions or factors represented by the survey items.","types":["measurement model"],"aliases":["factor structure"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_5640511988e4a731d9a9c3ff0ff91f39"},{"public_id":"co_81b375bfff86a0e462711645e3038267","status":"active","name":"validity","description":"The extent to which an instrument measures what it is intended to measure.","types":["measurement property"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_81b375bfff86a0e462711645e3038267"},{"public_id":"co_84111aa0c62a7f65c57c38aad65d7184","status":"active","name":"confirmatory factor analysis","description":"A statistical method used to test whether observed data fit a proposed factor structure.","types":["statistical method","validation method"],"aliases":["CFA"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_84111aa0c62a7f65c57c38aad65d7184"},{"public_id":"co_8a8cbdf6e1b7fb55b0b61f3cfafaaec2","status":"active","name":"institutional management/leadership style","description":"A survey dimension referring to perceptions of management and leadership practices within the institution.","types":["survey dimension"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_8a8cbdf6e1b7fb55b0b61f3cfafaaec2"},{"public_id":"co_8ff56646a1be54c36b667231bf21176a","status":"active","name":"internal consistency","description":"The degree to which items within a scale measure the same construct.","types":["reliability"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_8ff56646a1be54c36b667231bf21176a"},{"public_id":"co_b04ef82aedae087c2db6e26726a5e11a","status":"active","name":"known-groups validation","description":"A validation approach that compares scores across groups expected to differ on the measured construct.","types":["validation method"],"aliases":["known-group validity"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_b04ef82aedae087c2db6e26726a5e11a"},{"public_id":"co_b563d44f27a1e695634a4254e07da721","status":"active","name":"missed nursing care","description":"Nursing care that is omitted or left undone during routine care delivery.","types":["outcome","nursing construct"],"aliases":["missed care"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_b563d44f27a1e695634a4254e07da721"},{"public_id":"co_cb1163e74889c84d6549ed53c3b4c074","status":"active","name":"Cronbach's alpha","description":"A coefficient used to estimate the internal consistency of a scale.","types":["reliability coefficient"],"aliases":["alpha"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_cb1163e74889c84d6549ed53c3b4c074"},{"public_id":"co_d0abc57bf2ca7c44440dcf14e8c1e7eb","status":"active","name":"MISSCARE-BRASIL survey","description":"A Brazilian Portuguese instrument used to assess missed nursing care.","types":["survey","instrument"],"aliases":["MISSCARE-BRASIL"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_d0abc57bf2ca7c44440dcf14e8c1e7eb"}],"external_ids":{"DOI":"10.1590/1518-8345.2354.2975","ArXiv":null,"PubMed":29267546,"PubMedCentral":"5738959","MAG":2776741078,"DBLP":null,"ACL":null},"open_access":{"is_open_access":true,"pdf_url":"http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rlae/v25/0104-1169-rlae-25-e2975.pdf","landing_url":"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/90898a02dc184259cbf13b543f58d7d4dac6f346","source":"semantic_scholar","pdf_url_source":"semantic_scholar_open_access_pdf","license":"CCBY","status":"GOLD","reason":null},"reference_availability":{"status":"available","references_indexed":true,"full_text_available":false,"full_text_source":null,"count_basis":"semantic_scholar_metadata","extraction_status":"not_applicable","reason":null},"source":{"provider":"episteme2","base_corpus":"semantic_scholar_dump","freshness_mode":"unknown","basis":["semantic_scholar_metadata","postgres_metadata"],"limits":["paper metadata is based on indexed upstream scholarly datasets","claims and concepts are available only for extracted papers","absence of claims or concepts means no extracted graph data is available in this response"],"status":"available","degraded":false,"degraded_reasons":[],"diagnostics":{"status":"available","degraded":false,"degraded_reasons":[],"metadata_status":"available","graph_status":"available","abstract_status":"available"},"source_flags":5},"paper_id":631677,"paper_uid":"aa30d8d8-ba8b-4b47-9c13-a7410b5b3d6f","canonical_identity":{"paper_id":631677,"paper_uid":"aa30d8d8-ba8b-4b47-9c13-a7410b5b3d6f","identity_status":"available","lookup_basis":"semantic_scholar_external_id","compatibility_path":"corpus_id"},"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/papers/43388103"}