{"corpus_id":45862988,"paper_sha":"db61aa37a7118bc0ba80c393b11b3bb51c151598","doi":"10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11020191","arxiv_id":null,"pmid":21890791,"pmcid":"PMC3222234","mag_id":2087414280,"dblp_id":null,"acl_id":null,"title":"A critical review of the first 10 years of candidate gene-by-environment interaction research in psychiatry.","year":2011,"publication_date":"2011-10-01","venue":"American Journal of Psychiatry","journal":{"name":"The American journal of psychiatry","pages":"\n          1041-9\n        ","volume":"168 10"},"journal_issn":null,"journal_title":null,"publication_types":["Review","JournalArticle"],"pubmed_pub_types":["Journal Article","Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural","Review"],"s2_fields_of_study":["Medicine","Psychology"],"reference_count":42,"citation_count":1042,"influential_citation_count":53,"is_open_access":true,"arxiv_categories":null,"arxiv_license":null,"arxiv_journal_ref":null,"mesh_headings":[{"d":"Environment","mj":true,"ui":"D004777"},{"d":"Genetic Predisposition to Disease","mj":false,"ui":"D020022"},{"d":"Humans","mj":false,"ui":"D006801"},{"d":"Mental Disorders","mj":false,"qs":[{"q":"genetics","mj":true,"ui":"Q000235"}],"ui":"D001523"},{"d":"Psychiatry","mj":false,"qs":[{"q":"methods","mj":true,"ui":"Q000379"}],"ui":"D011570"}],"chemicals":null,"comments_corrections":null,"source_flags":5,"s2_open_access_pdf_url":"https://europepmc.org/articles/pmc3222234?pdf=render","s2_open_access_landing_url":"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9055dff3199a5af0c92d551964a897605f768c99","s2_open_access_license":null,"s2_open_access_status":"GREEN","pmc_open_access_pdf_url":null,"pmc_open_access_landing_url":null,"pmc_open_access_license":null,"pmc_open_access_status":null,"unpaywall_open_access_pdf_url":null,"unpaywall_open_access_landing_url":null,"unpaywall_open_access_license":null,"unpaywall_open_access_status":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: Gene-by-environment interaction (G×E) studies in psychiatry have typically been conducted using a candidate G×E (cG×E) approach, analogous to the candidate gene association approach used to test genetic main effects. Such cG×E research has received widespread attention and acclaim, yet cG×E findings remain controversial. The authors examined whether the many positive cG×E findings reported in the psychiatric literature were robust or if, in aggregate, cG×E findings were consistent with the existence of publication bias, low statistical power, and a high false discovery rate. METHOD: The authors conducted analyses on data extracted from all published studies (103 studies) from the first decade (2000-2009) of cG×E research in psychiatry. RESULTS: Ninety-six percent of novel cG×E studies were significant compared with 27% of replication attempts. These findings are consistent with the existence of publication bias among novel cG×E studies, making cG×E hypotheses appear more robust than they actually are. There also appears to be publication bias among replication attempts because positive replication attempts had smaller average sample sizes than negative ones. Power calculations using observed sample sizes suggest that cG×E studies are underpowered. Low power along with the likely low prior probability of a given cG×E hypothesis being true suggests that most or even all positive cG×E findings represent type I errors. CONCLUSIONS: In this new era of big data and small effects, a recalibration of views about groundbreaking findings is necessary. Well-powered direct replications deserve more attention than novel cG×E findings and indirect replications.","claims":[{"public_id":"cl_1a9652152cd9d433f14a4d01c6a77998","status":"active","text":"Among the 103 published psychiatric candidate gene-by-environment interaction studies from 2000-2009, 96% of novel studies were significant versus 27% of replication attempts.","confidence":0.98,"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_1a9652152cd9d433f14a4d01c6a77998"},{"public_id":"cl_f8ce86ac4405ee8326cf0e39b536a116","status":"active","text":"Low statistical power together with the likely low prior probability of true candidate gene-by-environment interaction hypotheses suggests that most or even all positive findings may be type I errors.","confidence":0.93,"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_f8ce86ac4405ee8326cf0e39b536a116"},{"public_id":"cl_c9a2221efe3ad010a441c5645807f90a","status":"active","text":"Observed sample sizes indicate that candidate gene-by-environment interaction studies are underpowered.","confidence":0.96,"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_c9a2221efe3ad010a441c5645807f90a"},{"public_id":"cl_bd686e8ff33957f4b1035b833209f33c","status":"active","text":"Replication attempts also appear to be affected by publication bias, because positive replications had smaller average sample sizes than negative replications.","confidence":0.9,"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_bd686e8ff33957f4b1035b833209f33c"},{"public_id":"cl_1850b5aa95e628d9d2f73a9da1211fec","status":"active","text":"The distribution of significant results is consistent with publication bias in novel candidate gene-by-environment interaction studies, which can make these hypotheses appear more robust than they are.","confidence":0.94,"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_1850b5aa95e628d9d2f73a9da1211fec"},{"public_id":"cl_a4f897691a1106abf4220eefd5ebb0e1","status":"active","text":"Well-powered direct replications deserve more attention than novel candidate gene-by-environment interaction findings and indirect replications.","confidence":0.89,"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_a4f897691a1106abf4220eefd5ebb0e1"}],"concepts":[{"public_id":"co_08c5c2b92255e3a7f5419ffb87672e69","status":"active","name":"type I errors","description":"False positive findings in which an effect is concluded to exist when it does not.","types":["error"],"aliases":["false positives"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_08c5c2b92255e3a7f5419ffb87672e69"},{"public_id":"co_2cf788c305ef24d4aec08006ee87ad8f","status":"active","name":"statistical power","description":"The probability that a study will detect an effect if it is truly present.","types":["statistical property"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_2cf788c305ef24d4aec08006ee87ad8f"},{"public_id":"co_5d3b32b67bb392b75ea8432810ce9689","status":"active","name":"prior probability","description":"The pre-study likelihood that a candidate hypothesis is true before considering the observed data.","types":["probability concept"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_5d3b32b67bb392b75ea8432810ce9689"},{"public_id":"co_5e14d78d211306eac4965dc2b82da353","status":"active","name":"novel cG×E studies","description":"First-report candidate gene-by-environment interaction studies testing new hypotheses.","types":["study type"],"aliases":["novel candidate gene-by-environment interaction studies"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_5e14d78d211306eac4965dc2b82da353"},{"public_id":"co_66646e26d73b3b281c28dc4c51c754cc","status":"active","name":"indirect replications","description":"Follow-up studies that test related but not identical versions of an original finding.","types":["study type"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_66646e26d73b3b281c28dc4c51c754cc"},{"public_id":"co_92b8a1962b6c24217995cc300f2f3c76","status":"active","name":"well-powered direct replications","description":"Replication studies designed with sufficient sample size to test the original finding directly.","types":["study type"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_92b8a1962b6c24217995cc300f2f3c76"},{"public_id":"co_bb8fca643858a4a0d96e111cf1e32033","status":"active","name":"replication attempts","description":"Follow-up studies that test whether previously reported candidate gene-by-environment interaction findings can be reproduced.","types":["study type"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_bb8fca643858a4a0d96e111cf1e32033"},{"public_id":"co_c7af271b93bff536846a977b25663351","status":"active","name":"publication bias","description":"A tendency for studies with significant or positive results to be more likely to appear in the published literature.","types":["bias"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_c7af271b93bff536846a977b25663351"},{"public_id":"co_ea8e225ae7bf7d5cd19d4bb8fab1a939","status":"active","name":"sample size","description":"The number of observations or participants included in a study.","types":["study characteristic"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_ea8e225ae7bf7d5cd19d4bb8fab1a939"},{"public_id":"co_f4d2172f722d7952c01bb0e27fc3f185","status":"active","name":"candidate gene-by-environment interaction research","description":"Research in psychiatry that tests whether specific genetic variants and environmental exposures interact to influence outcomes.","types":["research approach"],"aliases":["cG×E research","cG×E studies"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_f4d2172f722d7952c01bb0e27fc3f185"}],"external_ids":{"DOI":"10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11020191","ArXiv":null,"PubMed":21890791,"PubMedCentral":"PMC3222234","MAG":2087414280,"DBLP":null,"ACL":null},"open_access":{"is_open_access":true,"pdf_url":"https://europepmc.org/articles/pmc3222234?pdf=render","landing_url":"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9055dff3199a5af0c92d551964a897605f768c99","source":"semantic_scholar","pdf_url_source":"semantic_scholar_open_access_pdf","license":null,"status":"GREEN","reason":null},"reference_availability":{"status":"available","references_indexed":true,"full_text_available":false,"full_text_source":null,"count_basis":"semantic_scholar_metadata","extraction_status":"not_applicable","reason":null},"source":{"provider":"episteme2","base_corpus":"semantic_scholar_dump","freshness_mode":"unknown","basis":["semantic_scholar_metadata","postgres_metadata"],"limits":["paper metadata is based on indexed upstream scholarly datasets","claims and concepts are available only for extracted papers","absence of claims or concepts means no extracted graph data is available in this response"],"status":"available","degraded":false,"degraded_reasons":[],"diagnostics":{"status":"available","degraded":false,"degraded_reasons":[],"metadata_status":"available","graph_status":"available","abstract_status":"available"},"source_flags":5},"paper_id":632148,"paper_uid":"df250b14-ebb5-40c7-a20d-ac18f8fc86a3","canonical_identity":{"paper_id":632148,"paper_uid":"df250b14-ebb5-40c7-a20d-ac18f8fc86a3","identity_status":"available","lookup_basis":"semantic_scholar_external_id","compatibility_path":"corpus_id"},"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/papers/45862988"}