{"corpus_id":71929176,"paper_sha":"45806eee02cdf3d4bbf4952c7db384f8f4590d8d","doi":"10.1001/JAMA.1908.25310270030002F","arxiv_id":null,"pmid":null,"pmcid":null,"mag_id":2016031616,"dblp_id":null,"acl_id":null,"title":"THE UNITED STATES PHARMACOPEIA.","year":1908,"publication_date":"1908-01-04","venue":"","journal":{"name":"JAMA","pages":"30-34","volume":""},"journal_issn":null,"journal_title":null,"publication_types":["Review"],"pubmed_pub_types":null,"s2_fields_of_study":["Law","Medicine"],"reference_count":0,"citation_count":1197,"influential_citation_count":0,"is_open_access":true,"arxiv_categories":null,"arxiv_license":null,"arxiv_journal_ref":null,"mesh_headings":null,"chemicals":null,"comments_corrections":null,"source_flags":1,"s2_open_access_pdf_url":"https://zenodo.org/records/2392861/files/article.pdf","s2_open_access_landing_url":"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/45806eee02cdf3d4bbf4952c7db384f8f4590d8d","s2_open_access_license":"public-domain","s2_open_access_status":"GREEN","pmc_open_access_pdf_url":null,"pmc_open_access_landing_url":null,"pmc_open_access_license":null,"pmc_open_access_status":null,"unpaywall_open_access_pdf_url":null,"unpaywall_open_access_landing_url":null,"unpaywall_open_access_license":null,"unpaywall_open_access_status":null,"abstract":"It is not my present purpose to add to the many reviews or criticisms of the Pharmacopeia, but to call attention to two conditions, hoping that steps may be taken by this Section looking to their improvement. The first is the general loss of interest on the part of physicians in the revision of the Pharmacopeia. The Pharmacopeia was called into being by physicians in 1820, and in 1850 pharmacists were admitted to the convention; since then physicians have gradually relinquished control to pharmacists, and to-day we are confronted with an anomalous condition, in that the committee of revision of 1900, consisting of twenty-five men, numbered nineteen pharmacists or men identified with pharmaceutic institutions, and but six whose interests were entirely with medicine. For example, Dr. Squibb was almost universally known as a manufacturing pharmacist. Only ten members of the committee of revision had the title of M.D. This condition","claims":[{"public_id":"cl_ed769294f02e0a54f1ac1574168651cb","status":"active","text":"Only ten members of the 1900 revision committee held the title of M.D.","confidence":0.96,"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_ed769294f02e0a54f1ac1574168651cb"},{"public_id":"cl_92646256d0bb658c80ca8d6ea73c80a3","status":"active","text":"Physicians have largely lost interest in revising the United States Pharmacopeia, allowing pharmacists to assume predominant control over revision committees.","confidence":0.97,"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_92646256d0bb658c80ca8d6ea73c80a3"},{"public_id":"cl_04664c842db18bb82ab3b4f4ffcd230c","status":"active","text":"The 1900 revision committee was heavily weighted toward pharmacy interests, with nineteen members identified as pharmacists or as affiliated with pharmaceutic institutions and only six members whose interests were entirely with medicine.","confidence":0.98,"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/claims/cl_04664c842db18bb82ab3b4f4ffcd230c"}],"concepts":[{"public_id":"co_0ec321824998403fb5307806bc314f60","status":"active","name":"pharmaceutic institutions","description":"Institutions associated with pharmacy and pharmaceutical manufacturing or education.","types":["institution"],"aliases":["pharmaceutical institutions"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_0ec321824998403fb5307806bc314f60"},{"public_id":"co_2c0c826b30aa98eeb49281c05a14ac1b","status":"active","name":"physicians","description":"Medical doctors involved in clinical practice and, in this context, in Pharmacopeia revision.","types":["professional group"],"aliases":["medicine practitioners"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_2c0c826b30aa98eeb49281c05a14ac1b"},{"public_id":"co_406d69c619a969cda07dce8611a496b2","status":"active","name":"revision committee","description":"The body responsible for revising the Pharmacopeia.","types":["committee","governance body"],"aliases":["committee of revision"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_406d69c619a969cda07dce8611a496b2"},{"public_id":"co_452fef79d0384738d7ecb011fccf66cd","status":"active","name":"1900 revision committee","description":"The specific twenty-five-member committee mentioned for the 1900 Pharmacopeia revision.","types":["committee"],"aliases":["committee of revision of 1900"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_452fef79d0384738d7ecb011fccf66cd"},{"public_id":"co_6d2b683db14918b70443ba05ac945215","status":"active","name":"pharmacists","description":"Professionals trained in pharmacy who were involved in Pharmacopeia revision.","types":["professional group"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_6d2b683db14918b70443ba05ac945215"},{"public_id":"co_74dedade4d55d833209bdfb4e86c3554","status":"active","name":"M.D.","description":"The title indicating a Doctor of Medicine degree.","types":["degree","credential"],"aliases":["Doctor of Medicine"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_74dedade4d55d833209bdfb4e86c3554"},{"public_id":"co_8388f348faf69ee1ec39f0d01c7f4421","status":"active","name":"United States Pharmacopeia","description":"An official pharmacopeial reference standard for drugs and medicinal preparations in the United States.","types":["pharmacopeia","reference standard"],"aliases":["Pharmacopeia"],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_8388f348faf69ee1ec39f0d01c7f4421"},{"public_id":"co_d449507e5f7a63af9917582bb3f75795","status":"active","name":"medicine","description":"The medical profession and its interests in the Pharmacopeia revision process.","types":["field","professional interest"],"aliases":[],"contributors":[{"id":1,"public_id":"12632b8b5f","public_label":"Anonymous (12632b8b5f)","roles":["extraction"],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/u/12632b8b5f"}],"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/concepts/co_d449507e5f7a63af9917582bb3f75795"}],"external_ids":{"DOI":"10.1001/JAMA.1908.25310270030002F","ArXiv":null,"PubMed":null,"PubMedCentral":null,"MAG":2016031616,"DBLP":null,"ACL":null},"open_access":{"is_open_access":true,"pdf_url":"https://zenodo.org/records/2392861/files/article.pdf","landing_url":"https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/45806eee02cdf3d4bbf4952c7db384f8f4590d8d","source":"semantic_scholar","pdf_url_source":"semantic_scholar_open_access_pdf","license":"public-domain","status":"GREEN","reason":null},"reference_availability":{"status":"unknown","references_indexed":false,"full_text_available":false,"full_text_source":null,"count_basis":"semantic_scholar_metadata","extraction_status":"not_applicable","reason":null},"source":{"provider":"episteme2","base_corpus":"semantic_scholar_dump","freshness_mode":"unknown","basis":["semantic_scholar_metadata","postgres_metadata"],"limits":["paper metadata is based on indexed upstream scholarly datasets","claims and concepts are available only for extracted papers","absence of claims or concepts means no extracted graph data is available in this response"],"status":"available","degraded":false,"degraded_reasons":[],"diagnostics":{"status":"available","degraded":false,"degraded_reasons":[],"metadata_status":"available","graph_status":"available","abstract_status":"available"},"source_flags":1},"paper_id":631573,"paper_uid":"4d18abbd-2804-4577-9839-ab78156cb86b","canonical_identity":{"paper_id":631573,"paper_uid":"4d18abbd-2804-4577-9839-ab78156cb86b","identity_status":"available","lookup_basis":"semantic_scholar_external_id","compatibility_path":"corpus_id"},"url":"https://sah.borca.ai/papers/71929176"}