The probability of inconsistencies in complex collective decisions

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2005

• Venue

  Social Choice and Welfare

• Publication date

  2005-02-01

• Fields of study

  Mathematics, Computer Science, Political Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/s00355-003-0253-7
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Democratic Answers to Complex Questions – An Epistemic Perspective

  2006influential reference
• Aggregating disparate estimates of chance

  2006cited by this paper
• Single-switch preferences and the Ostrogorski paradox

  2006cited by this paper
• A simple proof of Sen's possibility theorem on majority decisions

  2005cited by this paper
• The (Im)Possibility of a Paretian Rational

  2005cited by this paper
• Democracy and Argument - Tracking Truth in Complex Social Decisions

  2004influential reference
• Aggregating Sets of Judgments: Two Impossibility Results Compared1

  2004cited by this paper
• Terrorism Prevention: A General Model

  2004cited by this paper
• Consistency in Measures of Social Homogeneity: A Connection with Proximity to Single Peaked Preferences

  2004cited by this paper
• The impartial culture maximizes the probability of majority cycles

  2003cited by this paper
• A possibility theorem on aggregation over multiple interconnected propositions

  2003cited by this paper
• Rational Aggregation

  2002influential reference
• Aggregating Sets of Judgments: An Impossibility Result

  2002influential reference
• Public reason, social choice, and cooperation

  2001cited by this paper
• Theoretical aspects of rationality and knowledge : proceedings of the eighth conference (TARK 2001), july 8-10, 2001, Certosa di Pontignano, University of Siena Italy

  2001cited by this paper
• Deliberative Democracy and the Discursive Dilemma

  2001cited by this paper
• Epistemic democracy : generalizing the Condorcet jury theorem

  2001influential reference
• Appendix: The jury theorem and the discursive dilemma

  2001cited by this paper
• Unlikelihood of Condorcet’s paradox in a large society

  2000influential reference
• More Easily Done than Said: Rules, Reasons, and Rational Social Choice

  1998cited by this paper
• Stay away from fair coins: A Condorcet jury theorem

  1997cited by this paper
• Voting on Referenda: The Separability Problem and Possible Solutions

  1997cited by this paper
• CONDORCET'S PARADOX AND THE CONDORCET EFFICIENCY OF VOTING RULES.

  1997cited by this paper
• Information pooling through majority-rule voting: Condorcet's jury theorem with correlated votes

  1995cited by this paper
• The One and the Many: Adjudication in Collegial Courts

  1993cited by this paper
• Condorcet's jury theorem, dependency among jurors

  1993cited by this paper
• Modeling Collegial Courts. II. Legal Doctrine

  1992cited by this paper
• Majority Systems and the Condorcet Jury Theorem

  1989cited by this paper
• The Ostrogorski paradox

  1989cited by this paper
• Condorcet's Paradox

  1989influential reference
• Unpacking the Court

  1986cited by this paper
• Research note: The accuracy of group majorities for disjunctive and conjunctive decision tasks☆☆☆

  1985influential reference
• Thirteen theorems in search of the truth

  1983cited by this paper
• The expected probability of Condorcet's paradox

  1981influential reference
• Condorcet's paradox and anonymous preference profiles

  1976cited by this paper
• The probability of the paradox of voting: A computable solution

  1976cited by this paper
• On frustration of the majority by fulfilment of the majority's will

  1976cited by this paper
• Majority Decision-Making with Partial Unidimensionality

  1969cited by this paper

• Inconsistent Belief Aggregation in Diverse and Polarised Groups

  2024cites this paper
• Voting Records as Assessors of Premises Behind Collective Decisions

  2022cites this paper
• The Semi-random Likelihood of Doctrinal Paradoxes

  2022influential citation
• Aggregation of Correlated Judgments on Multiple Interconnected Issues

  2022influential citation
• Optimal Decision Rules for the Discursive Dilemma

  2022influential citation
• Premise-based vs conclusion-based collective choice

  2021cites this paper
• Correction to: The doctrinal paradox: comparison of decision rules in a probabilistic framework

  2021cites this paper
• The Smoothed Likelihood of Doctrinal Paradoxes

  2021influential citation
• The doctrinal paradox: comparison of decision rules in a probabilistic framework

  2021influential citation
• The rarity of consistent aggregators

  2020cites this paper
• On the Probability of the Ostrogorski Paradox

  2020cites this paper
• Truth-tracking judgment aggregation over interconnected issues

  2019cites this paper
• Epistemic democracy with defensible premises

  2019cites this paper
• A psychologistic theory of metaphysical explanation

  2019influential citation
• Social Epistemology

  2019cites this paper
• Agenda Manipulation under Doctrinal Paradox

  2019cites this paper
• Preferences over procedures and outcomes in judgment aggregation: an experimental study

  2018cites this paper
• Preferences over procedures and outcomes in judgment aggregation: an experimental study

  2018cites this paper
• The doctrinal paradox: ROC analysis in a probabilistic framework

  2018influential citation
• A Role for Judgment Aggregation in Coauthoring Scientific Papers

  2018cites this paper
• Inconsistency Analysis in Patients ' Reviews

  2017cites this paper
• Binary Collective Choice with Multiple Premises

  2017influential citation
• The Constitutional Law of Agenda Control

  2016cites this paper
• Optimal group composition for efficient division of labor

  2016cites this paper
• Optimal group composition for efficient division of labor

  2016cites this paper
• The Structure of Norms and Legal Uncertainty: A Framework for the Functional Analysis of Law as Transformed in Multi-Member Decision Mechanisms

  2016influential citation
• Reconciling Knowledge and Collaborative E-Research

  2015cites this paper
• "I grade what I get but write what I think." Inconsistency Analysis in Patients' Reviews

  2015cites this paper
• The Logic of Group Decisions: Judgment Aggregation

  2015cites this paper
• Premise-based versus outcome-based information aggregation

  2015cites this paper
• Effective group size of majority vote accuracy in sequential decision-making

  2015cites this paper
• Judgment aggregation in search for the truth

  2014cites this paper
• Judgment-Rationale Inconsistency In The U.S. Supreme Court

  2014cites this paper
• The discursive dilemma in monetary policy

  2014cites this paper
• Judgment Aggregation: A Primer

  2014cites this paper
• Explaining Interest Rate Decisions When the MPC Members Believe in Different Stories

  2013cites this paper
• EPISTEMIC DEMOCRACY WITH DEFENSIBLE PREMISES1

  2013cites this paper
• Scoring rules for judgment aggregation

  2013cites this paper
• A Geometric Approach to Paradoxes of Majority Voting: From Anscombe's Paradox to the Discursive Dilemma with Saari and Nurmi

  2013cites this paper
• Judgment aggregation in search for the truth: the case of interconnections

  2012cites this paper
• Judgment aggregation and the problem of tracking the truth

  2012cites this paper
• Probability of inconsistencies in theory revision

  2012cites this paper
• A MODEL OF DELIBERATIVE AND AGGREGATIVE DEMOCRACY

  2012cites this paper
• Lectures on Logic and Computation

  2012cites this paper
• Truth-Seeking Judgment Aggregation over Interconnected Issues

  2012cites this paper
• EPISTEMOLOGY IN GROUP AGENCY: SIX OBJECTIONS IN SEARCH OF THE TRUTH

  2012cites this paper
• The Economics of Scientific Knowledge

  2012cites this paper
• Changing modes: a study of the knowledge economy of human service research in Australia

  2012cites this paper
• The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory

  2012cites this paper
• Epistemic Democracy with Defensible Premises 1 2

  2012cites this paper
• Philosophy of probability: Foundations, epistemology, and computation

  2011cites this paper
• An interpretive account of logical aggregation theory

  2011cites this paper
• The Doctrinal Paradox, a New Challenge for Behavioral Psychologists

  2011cites this paper
• Approximate Judgement Aggregation November 15 , 2011

  2011influential citation
• Condorcet s Jury Theorem Recapitulated

  2011cites this paper
• Introduction to Judgment Aggregation Lecture Notes for ESSLLI'11 1

  2011influential citation
• Epistemic aspects of representative government

  2011cites this paper
• Approximate Judgement Aggregation

  2011influential citation
• Aggregation of non-binary evaluations

  2010cites this paper
• Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics at Yale University Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No . 1753 INTRODUCTION TO JUDGMENT AGGREGATION

  2010cites this paper
• Behavioral evidence for framing effects in the resolution of the doctrinal paradox

  2010cites this paper
• Reliable Methods of Judgement Aggregation

  2010cites this paper
• Co-selection in R&D Project Portfolio Management: Theory and Evidence

  2010cites this paper
• Aggregation of binary evaluations

  2010cites this paper
• Aggregation Problems and Models: What Comes First?

  2010cites this paper
• Introduction to Judgment Aggregation

  2010influential citation
• Approximately classic judgement aggregation

  2010influential citation
• A geometric approach to judgment aggregation

  2009cites this paper
• Judgment aggregation: A survey

  2009influential citation
• A Geometric Approach to Paradoxes of Majority Voting in Abstract Aggregation Theory

  2009cites this paper
• Algorithmic Decision Theory: First International Conference, ADT 2009, Venice, Italy, October 20-23, 2009. Proceedings

  2009cites this paper
• Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation

  2009cites this paper
• : An Empirical Investigation

  2009cites this paper
• Collective decision-making with individual confidence scores in the decision rule

  2008influential citation
• WHAT IS IT LIKE TO BE A GROUP?

  2008cites this paper
• A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation

  2008cites this paper
• Bargaining and Judgment Aggregation

  2008cites this paper
• Distributed Cognition: A Perspective from Social Choice Theory

  2008cites this paper
• Reliable Methods of Judgment Aggregation

  2007cites this paper
• Optimal Judgment Aggregation

  2007cites this paper
• Arrow’s theorem in judgment aggregation

  2007cites this paper
• A generalised model of judgment aggregation

  2007influential citation
• STRATEGY-PROOF JUDGMENT AGGREGATION*

  2007cites this paper
• The limits of epistemic democracy

  2007cites this paper
• Deliberation and Agreement

  2007cites this paper
• Christian List The discursive dilemma and public reason

  2006cites this paper
• The Discursive Dilemma and Public Reason*

  2006influential citation
• Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation

  2006cites this paper
• Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems

  2006cites this paper
• Pengepolitiske komiteer : en empirisk undersøkelse av resonneringsdilemmaet

  2006cites this paper
• Aggregating disparate estimates of chance

  2006cites this paper
• Single-switch preferences and the Ostrogorski paradox

  2006cites this paper
• Strategy-proof judgment aggregation

  2005cites this paper
• The possibility of judgment aggregation for network agendas

  2005cites this paper
• Collective Economic Decisions and the Discursive Dilemma

  2005cites this paper
• Judgment aggregation in general logics

  2005cites this paper
• The (Im)Possibility of a Paretian Rational

  2005cites this paper
• Group Knowledge and Group Rationality: A Judgment Aggregation Perspective

  2005cites this paper
• On the many as one : a reply to Kornhauser and Sager

  2005cites this paper
• 1 Deliberation and Agreement

  2005cites this paper