Transitional impact of short‐ and long‐term outcomes of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer from Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0404

The JCOG0404 randomized controlled trial conducted to compare laparoscopic surgery (LAP) with open surgery (OP) for stage II/III colon cancer showed better short‐term outcomes and equal long‐term outcomes of LAP versus OP. Technical instrumentation of surgery and anticancer agents given during the registration period might have affected the outcomes.

• Publication year

  2019

• Venue

  Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery

• Publication date

  2019-03-26

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1002/ags3.12245PMID 31131359PMCID 6524094
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events

  2020cited by this paper
• Transitional impact of short‐ and long‐term outcomes of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer from Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0404

  2019cited by this paper
• Complete Resection without Any Ostomies by Laparoscopic Extended Surgery for Locally Advanced T4 Sigmoid Colon Cancer Invading the Urinary Bladder and Ureter

  2019cited by this paper
• Cranial-first approach of laparoscopic left colectomy for T4 descending colon cancer invading the Gerota’s fascia

  2019cited by this paper
• 3D laparoscopic surgery: a prospective clinical trial

  2018cited by this paper
• Supervision by a technically qualified surgeon affects the proficiency and safety of laparoscopic colectomy performed by novice surgeons

  2017cited by this paper
• Endoscopic surgery in Japan: The 12th national survey(2012–2013) by the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery

  2017cited by this paper
• Survival outcomes following laparoscopic versus open D3 dissection for stage II or III colon cancer (JCOG0404): a phase 3, randomised controlled trial.

  2017cited by this paper
• The learning curve for laparoscopic colectomy in colorectal cancer at a new regional hospital.

  2017cited by this paper
• Experience and dissection device are more relevant than patient-related factors for operation time in laparoscopic sigmoid resection—a retrospective 8-year observational study

  2017cited by this paper
• The Thunderbeat and Other Energy Devices in Laparoscopic Colorectal Resections: Analysis of Outcomes and Costs

  2017cited by this paper
• Randomized phase III study of bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI and bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (WJOG4407G).

  2016cited by this paper
• Open compared with laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision with central lymphadenectomy for colon cancer: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

  2016cited by this paper
• A prospective trial evaluating the clinical performance of a novel surgical energy device in laparoscopic colon surgery

  2015cited by this paper
• Short-Term Surgical Outcomes From a Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Laparoscopic and Open D3 Dissection for Stage II/III Colon Cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG 0404

  2014cited by this paper
• Quality control by photo documentation for evaluation of laparoscopic and open colectomy with D3 resection for stage II/III colorectal cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG 0404.

  2014cited by this paper
• Initial therapy with FOLFOXIRI and bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer.

  2014cited by this paper
• Development of an objective endoscopic surgical skill assessment system for pediatric surgeons: suture ligature model of the crura of the diaphragm in infant fundoplication

  2013cited by this paper
• Leucovorin, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab versus S-1 and oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (SOFT): an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised phase 3 trial.

  2013cited by this paper
• Evaluation of 2,590 urological laparoscopic surgeries undertaken by urological surgeons accredited by an endoscopic surgical skill qualification system in urological laparoscopy in Japan

  2012cited by this paper
• Skill accreditation system for laparoscopic gastroenterologic surgeons in Japan

  2010cited by this paper
• Five‐year follow‐up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer

  2010cited by this paper
• Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.

  2009cited by this paper
• Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease: follow-up of a prospective randomized trial

  2009cited by this paper
• Short-Term Outcomes of the Australasian Randomized Clinical Study Comparing Laparoscopic and Conventional Open Surgical Treatments for Colon Cancer: The ALCCaS Trial

  2008cited by this paper
• Laparoscopic Colectomy for Cancer Is Not Inferior to Open Surgery Based on 5-Year Data From the COST Study Group Trial

  2007cited by this paper
• Ultrasonic Versus Standard Electric Dissection in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

  2005cited by this paper
• Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

  2005cited by this paper
• Randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG 0404.

  2005cited by this paper
• Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

  2005cited by this paper
• A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

  2004cited by this paper
• A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

  2004cited by this paper
• Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial.

  2002cited by this paper
• Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections

  2001cited by this paper
• Safety and advantages of laparoscopicvs. open colectomy in the elderly

  2000cited by this paper
• Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer : short-term outcomes of a randomised trial

  year unknowncited by this paper

• Utility of establishing a unified regional database for enhancing academic output and specialist certification in Japan.

  2026cites this paper
• Risk factors for severe postoperative complications after left colectomy: A multicenter, retrospective study.

  2026cites this paper
• A modified combined approach in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon based on surgical trunk orientation: a case of a new surgical technique

  2025cites this paper
• Postoperative Pain and Incisional Hernia of Specimen Extraction Sites for Minimally Invasive Rectal Cancer Surgery: Comparison of Periumbilical Midline Incision Versus Pfannenstiel Incision

  2025cites this paper
• Impact of double-bolus tracking to individualize scan timing of the portal venous phase in preoperative computed tomography colonography angiography for right-sided colon cancer

  2025cites this paper
• Impact of obesity on the short-term outcomes of robotic surgery for rectal cancer: a Japanese multicenter study

  2025cites this paper
• Colorectal Cancer Spectrum: From Subtypes and Epidemiology to Oncotherapies

  2025cites this paper
• Risk factors for pulmonary complications after colorectal cancer surgery: a Japanese multicenter study

  2024cites this paper
• Combined versus conventional approaches in laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy: a retrospective analysis

  2024cites this paper
• The assessment of adjuvant chemotherapy benefits after D3 lymphadenectomy in patients with colon cancer: a propensity score matching study

  2024influential citation
• Laparoscopic colectomy for patients with poor American Society of Anesthesiology classifications

  2024cites this paper
• A Multicenter Analysis of Short-term and Long-term Outcomes Following Laparoscopic Multivisceral Resection for Advanced Colorectal Cancer.

  2024cites this paper
• Long‐term oncological outcome of reduced‐port laparoscopic surgery (single‐incision plus one port) as a technical option for rectal cancer

  2023cites this paper
• Mid‐term outcomes of laparoscopic vs open colectomy for pathological T4 and/or N2 colon cancer patients: Multicenter study using propensity score matched analysis

  2023cites this paper
• Long-term outcome of reduced-port laparoscopic surgery (single port surgery + 1 port) as a technical option in the patients with rectal cancer

  2022cites this paper
• Meta analysis of indocyanine green fluorescence in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery

  2022cites this paper
• Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer in Patients on Hemodialysis: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis

  2021cites this paper
• Laparoscopic Surgery Reduces Risk of Postoperative Complications and Non Cancer-related Survival in Patients Over 80 Years Old With Colorectal Cancer.

  2021cites this paper
• New Technique of Laparoscopic Paraaortic Lymph Node Dissection for Colorectal Cancer Using Fluorescence Navigation.

  2021cites this paper
• Comparison of Survival between Single-Access and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Rectal Cancer

  2021cites this paper
• Frailty is an independent risk factor for recurrence and mortality following curative resection of stage I–III colorectal cancer

  2020cites this paper
• Uptake of minimally invasive surgery for early stage colorectal cancer and its effect on survival: A population-based study.

  2020cites this paper
• Short‐term and long‐term outcomes of laparoscopic colectomy with multivisceral resection for surgical T4b colon cancer: Comparison with open colectomy

  2020cites this paper
• The Impact of Comorbid Diabetes on Short-Term Postoperative Outcomes in Stage I/II Colon Cancer Patients Undergoing Open Colectomy

  2020cites this paper
• Reoperative laparoscopic rectal surgery: Another potential tool for the expert's toolbox.

  2020cites this paper
• Cranial-first approach of laparoscopic left colectomy for T4 descending colon cancer invading the Gerota’s fascia

  2019cites this paper
• Complete Resection without Any Ostomies by Laparoscopic Extended Surgery for Locally Advanced T4 Sigmoid Colon Cancer Invading the Urinary Bladder and Ureter

  2019cites this paper
• Transitional impact of short‐ and long‐term outcomes of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer from Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0404

  2019cites this paper