Statistical significance testing of differences in values of metrics like recall, precision and balanced F-score is a necessary part of empirical natural language processing. Unfortunately, we find in a set of experiments that many commonly used tests often underestimate the significance and so are less likely to detect differences that exist between different techniques. This underestimation comes from an independence assumption that is often violated. We point out some useful tests that do not make this assumption, including computationally-intensive randomization tests.
More accurate tests for the statistical significance of result differences
Published 2000 in International Conference on Computational Linguistics
ABSTRACT
PUBLICATION RECORD
- Publication year
2000
- Venue
International Conference on Computational Linguistics
- Publication date
2000-07-31
- Fields of study
Computer Science
- Identifiers
- External record
- Source metadata
Semantic Scholar
CITATION MAP
EXTRACTION MAP
CLAIMS
- No claims are published for this paper.
CONCEPTS
- No concepts are published for this paper.
REFERENCES
Showing 1-9 of 9 references · Page 1 of 1