Current status of evidence-based sports medicine.

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2014

• Venue

  Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopy And Related

• Publication date

  2014-03-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.11.015PMID 24581261
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• The level of evidence 5 blues: investigating medicine when experience trumps equipoise.

  2013cited by this paper
• Level of Evidence in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Research

  2013cited by this paper
• An evaluation of the quality of statistical design and analysis of published medical research: results from a systematic survey of general orthopaedic journals

  2012cited by this paper
• Conflict of interest in orthopaedic journals.

  2012cited by this paper
• Publication of Sports Medicine–Related Randomized Controlled Trials Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov

  2012cited by this paper
• Physician-industry conflict of interest: public opinion regarding industry-sponsored research.

  2012cited by this paper
• Analysis of performance metrics reporting in papers comparing treatments or materials/devices in four important orthopaedic journals for the year 2009.

  2011cited by this paper
• Clinical trials in orthopaedics research. Part I. Cultural and practical barriers to randomized trials in orthopaedics.

  2011influential reference
• A systematic survey of the quality of research reporting in general orthopaedic journals.

  2011cited by this paper
• Clinical trials in orthopaedics research. Part II. Prioritization for randomized controlled clinical trials.

  2011cited by this paper
• Evidence-based orthopedic surgery: is it possible?

  2010cited by this paper
• Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

  2010cited by this paper
• Quality of Reporting in Randomized Trials

  2010cited by this paper
• Study design in clinical orthopaedic trials

  2010cited by this paper
• Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement

  2009cited by this paper
• Levels of evidence in research published in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume) over the last thirty years.

  2009cited by this paper
• Multicenter collaboration in observational research: improving generalizability and efficiency.

  2009cited by this paper
• DOES A “LEVEL I EVIDENCE” RATING IMPLY HIGH QUALITY OF REPORTING IN ORTHOPAEDIC RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIALS?

  2009cited by this paper
• The roles of funding source, clinical trial outcome, and quality of reporting in orthopedic surgery literature.

  2008cited by this paper
• Randomized Controlled Trials: Questions, Answers, and Musings

  2008cited by this paper
• Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials?

  2006cited by this paper
• An analysis of the quality of cartilage repair studies.

  2005cited by this paper
• Level of evidence in orthopaedic journals.

  2005cited by this paper
• A controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee

  2005cited by this paper
• A controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee.

  2002cited by this paper
• The Quality of Reporting of Randomized Trials in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery from 1988 through 2000

  2002influential reference
• The CONSORT Statement

  1996cited by this paper
• Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents.

  1989cited by this paper

• An 11-Year (2012–2022) review of Journal of Athletic Training publication study designs and sample sizes

  2025cites this paper
• The Fragility of Statistical Significance in Sham Orthopaedic Surgery: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

  2023cites this paper
• Overcoming the “Ostrich Effect”: A Narrative Review on the Incentives and Consequences of Questionable Research Practices in Kinesiology

  2023cites this paper
• What are the health consequences associated with differences in medical malpractice liability laws? An instrumental variable analysis of surgery effects on health outcomes for proximal humeral facture across states with different liability rules

  2022cites this paper
• Reporting and transparent research practices in sports medicine and orthopaedic clinical trials: a meta-research study

  2022cites this paper
• Nearly One-Third of Published Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Yield Inconclusive Conclusions: A Systematic Review.

  2021cites this paper
• State medical malpractice laws and utilization of surgical treatment for rotator cuff tear and proximal humerus fracture: an observational cohort study

  2021cites this paper
• Understanding Network Meta-analysis (NMA) Conclusions Requires Scrutiny of Methods and Results: Introduction to NMA and the Geometry of Evidence.

  2021cites this paper
• The devil is in the details: Reporting and transparent research practices in sports medicine and orthopedic clinical trials

  2021cites this paper
• Twenty Five–Year Publication Trends in Foot and Ankle Literature: Improved Methodological Quality and Internationality With Time

  2021cites this paper
• Many High-Quality Randomized Controlled Trials in Sports Physical Therapy Are Making False-Positive Claims of Treatment Effect: A Systematic Survey.

  2020cites this paper
• Are questionable research practices facilitating new discoveries in sport and exercise medicine? The proportion of supported hypotheses is implausibly high

  2020cites this paper
• Editorial Commentary: Could Biological Treatments Be the Game-Changing Factor for Osteoarthritis?

  2019cites this paper
• Many high quality RCTs in sports physical therapy are making false positive claims of treatment effect: a systematic survey

  2019cites this paper
• Geographic variation in the treatment of proximal humerus fracture: an update on surgery rates and treatment consensus

  2019cites this paper
• Editorial Commentary: Revision Knee Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Failure Rates Appear to Have Declined yet Different Research Methods Could Show Different Results.

  2018cites this paper
• Running Performance, $${\rm V}{\rm O}_{\rm {2max}}$$VO2max, and Running Economy: The Widespread Issue of Endogenous Selection Bias

  2017cites this paper
• Editorial Commentary: Leveraging the Literature: What Can a Half-Century's Worth of Studies Tell Us About Recurrent Instability Following Primary Shoulder Dislocation?

  2017cites this paper
• The Fragility of Statistically Significant Findings From Randomized Trials in Sports Surgery: A Systematic Survey

  2017cites this paper
• International Olympic Committee consensus statement: harassment and abuse (non-accidental violence) in sport

  2016cites this paper
• Osteochondral Autograft Transfer Versus Microfracture in the Knee: A Meta-analysis of Prospective Comparative Studies at Midterm.

  2016cites this paper
• Editorial Commentary: The Demise of Randomized Controlled Trials in Hip Arthroscopy?

  2016cites this paper
• Muscles, Ligaments and Tendons Journal - Basic principles and recommendations in clinical and field Science Research: 2016 Update.

  2016cites this paper
• Editorial Commentary: Proximal Stabilization for Recurrent Patellar Dislocation--Respect the Anatomy and Achieve Excellent Outcomes Regardless of Specific Technique.

  2016cites this paper
• Editorial Commentary: Open Versus Arthroscopic Biceps Tenodesis--You Choose.

  2016cites this paper
• Update on the Methodological Quality of Research Published in The American Journal of Sports Medicine

  2016cites this paper
• Systematic Survey The Fragility of Statistically Significant Findings From Randomized Trials in Sports Surgery : A

  2016cites this paper
• The IOC Consensus Statement: harassment and abuse (non-accidental violence) in sport

  2016cites this paper
• Comparing 2011-2013 to 10 and 20 Years Prior

  2015cites this paper
• Thirty years brings major change.

  2015cites this paper
• Editorial Commentary: Platelet-Rich Plasma Improves Knee Pain and Function in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

  2015cites this paper
• The Expectation Game: Patient Comprehension Is a Determinant of Outcome.

  2015cites this paper
• Editorial Commentary: Platelet-Rich Plasma Improves Knee Pain and Function in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis.

  2015cites this paper
• Arthroscopic and sports medicine science: looking beyond the level of evidence (for now).

  2014cites this paper
• ODU Digital

  year unknowncites this paper