The Quality of Reporting of Randomized Trials in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery from 1988 through 2000

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2002

• Venue

  Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American volume

• Publication date

  2002-03-01

• Fields of study

  Medicine

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.2106/00004623-200203000-00009PMID 11886908
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar, PubMed

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Physician interpretations and textbook definitions of blinding terminology in randomized controlled trials.

  2001cited by this paper
• Type-II Error Rates (Beta Errors) of Randomized Trials in Orthopaedic Trauma

  2001cited by this paper
• How to randomise

  1999cited by this paper
• Why transition from alternation to randomisation in clinical trials was made

  1999cited by this paper
• Assessing the quality of randomized trials: reliability of the Jadad scale.

  1999cited by this paper
• Trials: the next 50 years

  1998cited by this paper
• Quality of full and final publications reporting acute stroke trials: a systematic review.

  1998cited by this paper
• Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?

  1998cited by this paper
• A qualitative assessment of randomized controlled trials in otolaryngology

  1998influential reference
• How to report randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials.

  1997cited by this paper
• Lies, damn lies, and reports of RCTs.

  1996cited by this paper
• Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?

  1996influential reference
• How to report randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement.

  1996cited by this paper
• Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement

  1996cited by this paper
• The statistical analysis of kappa statistics in multiple samples.

  1996cited by this paper
• Reporting randomized controlled trials. An experiment and a call for responses from readers.

  1995cited by this paper
• Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: an annotated bibliography of scales and checklists.

  1995cited by this paper
• Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials.

  1995cited by this paper
• Randomized, controlled trials in surgery

  1994cited by this paper
• Randomized controlled trials in surgery.

  1994cited by this paper
• Clinical studies in surgical journals—have we improved?

  1993cited by this paper
• The Ends of Human Life: Medical Ethics in a Liberal Polity

  1992cited by this paper
• Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis.

  1992cited by this paper
• Meta-analysis in epidemiology, with special reference to studies of the association between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer: a critique.

  1991cited by this paper
• Validation of an index of the quality of review articles.

  1991cited by this paper
• Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use.

  1984cited by this paper
• Randomized clinical trials in the evaluation of surgical innovation.

  1979cited by this paper

• The Effectiveness of Interventions in Orthopaedic Surgeons' Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review.

  2026cites this paper
• An Assessment of the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Publication Trends From 2012 Through 2022

  2025cites this paper
• Quadriceps Tendon Graft Leads to Stronger Flexion and Weaker Extension of the Knee Than Hamstring Graft Post-ACLR: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  2025cites this paper
• Statistical Power in Musculoskeletal Research: A Meta-Review of 266 Randomised Controlled Trials

  2025cites this paper
• Adherence to CONSORT guidelines in selected general orthopaedic journals.

  2025cites this paper
• Quality Assessment of Computer-Assisted Navigation Knee Arthroplasty Studies.

  2025cites this paper
• A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis of Autologous Fat Transfer: Fat Transfer Confers a 4.2% Incidence of Complications

  2025cites this paper
• Rates of Registry Research Have Increased in Podium and Poster Presentations at the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons

  2024cites this paper
• The Rising Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials in The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery

  2024cites this paper
• A Critical Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial Quality in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

  2024cites this paper
• Evidence mapping of randomized clinical trials in hepatobiliary surgery.

  2023cites this paper
• The Fragility of Statistical Significance in Sham Orthopaedic Surgery: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

  2023cites this paper
• Fifty Most-Cited Research Articles in Elbow Surgery: A Modern Reading List

  2023cites this paper
• Choosing the Best Design in Surgical Research.

  2023cites this paper
• Teaching Science to the Next Generation.

  2023cites this paper
• The Importance of Pragmatic Study Design to the Scholarly Influence of Surgical Hip Fracture Randomized Controlled Trials

  2023cites this paper
• The Role of Patient Advocates and Sarcoma Community Initiatives in Musculoskeletal Oncology. Moving towards Evidence-Based Advocacy to Empower Evidence- Based Medicine.

  2023cites this paper
• Assessing the Change in Operative Treatment Rates for Acute Midshaft Clavicle Fractures

  2023cites this paper
• Network meta-analysis: What is its purpose in Orthopaedic literature?

  2022cites this paper
• Analysis of the frequency, characteristics, and reasons for termination of shoulder- and elbow-related clinical trials.

  2022cites this paper
• Patients Lost to Follow-up in Shoulder Arthroplasty: Descriptive Characteristics and Reasons

  2022cites this paper
• Evidenzbasierte Forschung in der Plastischen und Ästhetischen Chirurgie: Querschnittsanalyse von Forschungsarbeiten im Zeitraum 2019–2021

  2022cites this paper
• Outcome of Surgical Repair and Rehabilitation of Flexor Tendon Injuries in Zone II of the Hand: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

  2022cites this paper
• Total Hip Arthroplasty Itself May Be a Parachute, but Everything Else We Do is Not.

  2022cites this paper
• Assessing the uncertainty of treatment outcomes in a previous systematic review of venous leg ulcer randomized controlled trials: Additional secondary analysis

  2021cites this paper
• Levels of evidence backing the AAOS clinical practice guidelines

  2021cites this paper
• Common errors in the design of orthopaedic trials: Has anything changed?

  2021cites this paper
• Quantifying the Level of Evidence of Podium Presentations at the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons From 2015 to 2019.

  2021cites this paper
• Biomechanically superior treatments do not translate into improved outcomes in randomized controlled trials

  2021cites this paper
• Is Our Science Representative? A Systematic Review of Racial and Ethnic Diversity in Orthopaedic Clinical Trials from 2000 to 2020

  2021cites this paper
• Herausforderungen von Evidenzlevel-1-Studien in der Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie

  2021cites this paper
• Methodological reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in three leading sports medicine journals over 10 years

  2020cites this paper
• Has the Level of Evidence in Orthopaedic Trauma and Nontrauma Publications Improved? A Publication Review of 3 Major Orthopaedic Journals

  2020cites this paper
• Treatment of Ulnar Impaction Syndrome A Systematic Review

  2020cites this paper
• The 100 Most Impactful Papers in Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery over the Last 25 Years: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Orthopaedic Literature

  2020cites this paper
• An Assessment of Randomized Controlled Trial Quality in The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery: Update from 2001 to 2013.

  2020cites this paper
• Assessing the level of evidence in the orthopaedic literature, 2013–2018: a review of 3449 articles in leading orthopaedic journals

  2020cites this paper
• Detecting the extent of control over selection bias relating to oral health and otorhinolaryngology: cross-sectional study

  2020cites this paper
• The Fragility of Statistically Significant Findings From Randomized Controlled Trials in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

  2020cites this paper
• Type of Review and How to Get Started

  2019cites this paper
• Level 1 Evidence: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

  2019cites this paper
• Surgical repair versus conservative treatment and subacromial decompression for the treatment of rotator cuff tears.

  2019cites this paper
• Effects of a proposal to alter the statistical significance threshold on previously published orthopaedic trauma randomized controlled trials.

  2019cites this paper
• Meniscal Repair in Pediatric Populations: A Systematic Review of Outcomes

  2019cites this paper
• Complications Following Internal Fixator in the Treatment of Pelvic Fracture.

  2019cites this paper
• Physiotherapy as an Initial Treatment Option for Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-analysis of 5 Randomized Controlled Trials

  2019cites this paper
• Which study outcomes change practice.

  2019cites this paper
• Younger age and greater preoperative function predict compliance with 2-year follow-up visits after ACL reconstruction: an analysis of the PIVOT multicentre trial

  2018cites this paper
• Risk of bias and the reporting of surgeons' experience in randomized controlled trials of total hip and total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review

  2018cites this paper
• The quality of reporting in randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis: A cross-sectional survey

  2018cites this paper
• Quality assessment of controlled clinical trials published in Orthopaedics and Traumatology journals in Spanish: An observational study through handsearching and evidence mapping

  2018cites this paper
• Are large fracture trials really possible? What we have learned from the randomized controlled damage control study?

  2018cites this paper
• Design and conduct of clinical trials for breast cancer

  2018cites this paper
• Misconceptions, Misuses, and Misinterpretations of P Values and Significance Testing

  2017cites this paper
• Osteochondral talar lesions and ankle biomechanics

  2017cites this paper
• Level of evidence of free papers presented at the European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy congress from 2008 to 2016

  2017cites this paper
• Evidence-Based Medicine

  2017cites this paper
• The Fragility of Statistically Significant Findings From Randomized Trials in Sports Surgery: A Systematic Survey

  2017cites this paper
• Predicting and Preventing Loss to Follow-up of Adult Trauma Patients in Randomized Controlled Trials: An Example from the FLOW Trial

  2017cites this paper
• Complications of sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma - A systematic review of the literature.

  2017cites this paper
• Complications after prominent ear correction: A systematic review of the literature.

  2017cites this paper
• A Historical Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery

  2017cites this paper
• Evidence-Based Medicine in Aesthetic Surgery: The Significance of Level to Aesthetic Surgery

  2017cites this paper
• Complications following completion lymphadenectomy versus therapeutic lymphadenectomy for melanoma - A systematic review of the literature.

  2017cites this paper
• The quality of randomised controlled trials involving surgery from the hand to the elbow: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE LITERATURE

  2017cites this paper
• Quality of reporting in surgical randomized clinical trials

  2017cites this paper
• Single-Bundle and Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 441 Patients at a Minimum 2 Years' Follow-up.

  2017cites this paper
• Return to sport after the surgical management of articular cartilage lesions in the knee: a meta-analysis

  2017cites this paper
• Descriptive analysis and level of evidence of orthopedic publication of Minas Gerais state

  2016cites this paper
• Has the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in thoracic surgery improved?

  2016cites this paper
• Understanding Orthopaedic Registry Studies: A Comparison with Clinical Studies.

  2016cites this paper
• 2015 Outstanding Paper Winner: Surgical Science Total disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical interbody fusion: use of the Spine Tango registry to supplement the evidence from randomized control trials

  2016cites this paper
• The Importance of a Registry in Spinal Surgery

  2016cites this paper
• One-stage or two-stage revision surgery for prosthetic hip joint infection – the INFORM trial: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

  2016cites this paper
• Editorial. Classes of evidence in neurosurgery.

  2016cites this paper
• Randomized controlled trials and neurosurgery: the ideal fit or should alternative methodologies be considered?

  2016cites this paper
• Level 2 Observational Studies: A Practical Alternative to Randomized Trials in Plastic Surgery.

  2016cites this paper
• Surgical indications for long head biceps tenodesis: a systematic review

  2016cites this paper
• Level of clinical evidence presented at the open and closed American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons annual meeting over 10 years (2005–2014)

  2016cites this paper
• Level of Clinical Evidence Presented at the Arthroscopy Association of North America Annual Meeting Over 10 Years (2006-2015).

  2016cites this paper
• Systematic Survey The Fragility of Statistically Significant Findings From Randomized Trials in Sports Surgery : A

  2016cites this paper
• Update on the Methodological Quality of Research Published in The American Journal of Sports Medicine

  2016cites this paper
• Loss to follow-up in orthopaedic clinical trials: a systematic review

  2016cites this paper
• Outcome Reporting in Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials

  2016cites this paper
• Immobilization in External Rotation Versus Internal Rotation After Primary Anterior Shoulder Dislocation

  2016cites this paper
• Total disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical interbody fusion: use of the Spine Tango registry to supplement the evidence from randomized control trials.

  2016cites this paper
• Curved versus Straight Stem Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty Osteoarthritis Multicenter trial (CUSTOM): design of a prospective blinded randomised controlled multicentre trial

  2016cites this paper
• Quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in chiropractic using the CONSORT checklist

  2016cites this paper
• Evaluation of Quality of Lower Limb Arthroplasty Observational Studies Using the AQUILA Checklist

  2015cites this paper
• Understanding Orthopaedic Registry Studies

  2015cites this paper
• Hip fracture surgery: improving the quality of the evidence base.

  2015cites this paper
• Feasibility of individual patient data meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery

  2015cites this paper
• Level of clinical evidence presented at the International Society for Hip Arthroscopy Annual Scientific Meeting over 5 years (2010–2014)

  2015cites this paper
• Comparing 2011-2013 to 10 and 20 Years Prior

  2015cites this paper
• Authors report lack of time as main reason for unpublished research presented at biomedical conferences: a systematic review.

  2015cites this paper
• The Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials in Pediatric Orthopaedics: Are We Improving?

  2015cites this paper
• High-Dose Corticosteroid Use and Risk of Hip Osteonecrosis: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Literature Review

  2015cites this paper
• Operative treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome: a systematic review

  2015cites this paper
• Hierarchy of evidence referring to the central nervous system in a high-impact radiation oncology journal: a 10-year assessment. Descriptive critical appraisal study

  2015cites this paper
• Randomized controlled trials and neuro-oncology: should alternative designs be considered?

  2015cites this paper