Epistemic Trust in Science

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2013

• Venue

  British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

• Publication date

  2013-06-01

• Fields of study

  Mathematics, Philosophy

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1093/bjps/axs007
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Edinburgh Research Explorer Epistemic dependence

  2015cited by this paper
• Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal

  2009cited by this paper
• Bias and values in scientific research

  2009cited by this paper
• The Role of Trust in Knowledge

  2007cited by this paper
• Design Rules: Industrial Research and Epistemic Merit*

  2006cited by this paper
• Knowledge in a Social World

  2001cited by this paper
• Deciding to Believe

  2001cited by this paper
• Science, Truth, and Democracy

  2001cited by this paper
• Inductive Risk and Values in Science

  2000influential reference
• Our Attitude Towards the Motivation of Those We Trust

  2000cited by this paper
• Knowledge in a Social World

  1999cited by this paper
• Feminism, science, and the philosophy of science

  1996cited by this paper
• COGNITIVE AND NON-COGNITIVE VALUES IN SCIENCE: RETHINKING THE DICHOTOMY'

  1996cited by this paper
• The Cunning of Trust

  1995cited by this paper
• Deciding to trust, coming to believe

  1994cited by this paper
• The Advancement of Science

  1993cited by this paper
• Betting on Theories

  1993cited by this paper
• Liaisons: Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences

  1991cited by this paper
• Epistemic Tit for Tat

  1987cited by this paper
• Convention: A Philosophical Study

  1986cited by this paper
• Trust and Antitrust

  1986influential reference
• Justification and Knowledge

  1979cited by this paper
• What is Justified Belief

  1979influential reference
• Problems of the Self: Deciding to believe

  1973cited by this paper
• On the Seriousness of Mistakes

  1962cited by this paper
• Must the Scientist Make Value Judgments

  1960cited by this paper
• Valuation and Acceptance of Scientific Hypotheses

  1956influential reference
• Science and Human Values

  1956cited by this paper
• The Scientist Qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments

  1953cited by this paper
• Theory of Experimental Inference.

  1949cited by this paper
• Science and Human Values

  1934cited by this paper

• When to recommend no experiment? drug regulation and the institutional shaping of pursuitworthiness

  2026cites this paper
• Ad hominem arguments in scientific discourses – rational heuristic or dangerous immunisation strategy?

  2026cites this paper
• Architecting Trust in Artificial Epistemic Agents

  2026cites this paper
• Value-freedom & patient autonomy.

  2026cites this paper
• Historical Violence and Public Health: Institutional Post-Traumatic Stress and Vaccine Acceptance in Romania

  2026cites this paper
• RELASI ONTOLOGIS BAHASA DAN SAINS: QUO VADIS FILSAFAT ILMU DI ERA DISRUPSI ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

  2026cites this paper
• Of opaque oracles: epistemic dependence on AI in science poses no novel problems for social epistemology

  2025cites this paper
• Flexible or Rigid? A Functionalist Approach to Epistemic Standards

  2025cites this paper
• Trust in Scientific Expertise and the Varying Demands of Value Transparency

  2025cites this paper
• Community science and the value-free ideal

  2025cites this paper
• The WHO and the ‘whose values?’ problem: on the partial democratisation of science

  2025cites this paper
• Mapping the evolution of epistemic trust in artificial intelligence: a bibliometric analysis of key themes, influences, and global trends

  2025cites this paper
• Expert trustworthiness and the value-free ideal of science

  2025cites this paper
• Developing a scale to measure epistemic trust in open educational resources (OERs)

  2025cites this paper
• Trust and Transparency in Artificial Intelligence

  2025cites this paper
• Quasi-universal acceptance of basic science in the United States

  2025cites this paper
• Rethinking Trust in Scientists as a Network Model: A Global Analysis and Implications for Science Communication

  2025cites this paper
• Trust in science amid a replication crisis.

  2025cites this paper
• Scientific values and value-based science reporting

  2025cites this paper
• “Foundation Models for Research: a Matter of Trust?”

  2025cites this paper
• Patient values and inductive risk in disorders of consciousness

  2025cites this paper
• Science Denial

  2025cites this paper
• Handling Disagreement in Vaccine Research: From Trustworthy Experts to Trustworthy Institutions

  2025cites this paper
• From the CDC to emerging infectious disease publics: The long-now of polarizing and complex health crises

  2025cites this paper
• The Danger of Precision Medicine Hesitancy

  2025cites this paper
• In Whom We Trust: The Effect of Trust, Subjective Norms, and Socioeconomic Status on Attitudes and COVID-19 Vaccination Intentions

  2025cites this paper
• Public engagement with science: tempering our expectations

  2025cites this paper
• When Scientists Speak Up: Trustworthiness in Advocacy Contexts

  2025cites this paper
• A (Consequence-Oriented) critique of the argument from inductive risk

  2025cites this paper
• Priced out of belonging? Insufficient concessions on membership fees across international societies in ecology and evolution

  2025cites this paper
• Experts – Part I: What They Are and How to Identify Them

  2024cites this paper
• COVID-19 Vaccine decision-making: trust among the transgender and disability communities in India

  2024cites this paper
• Consistent effects of science and scientist characteristics on public trust across political regimes

  2024cites this paper
• The Academic Scientist’s Commitment to Epistemic Responsibility

  2024cites this paper
• I want to be safe: understanding the main drivers behind vaccination choice throughout the pandemic

  2024cites this paper
• Prerequisites for the Positioning of Scientific Disciplines: An Analysis Including Values, Norms, and Science-Related Issues

  2024cites this paper
• Exploring Students’ Multimodal Representations of Ideas About Epistemic Reading of Scientific Texts in Generative AI Tools

  2024cites this paper
• Concerns about Contextual Values in Science and the Legitimate/Illegitimate Distinction

  2024cites this paper
• A crisis of confidence? Intervening in vaccine hesitancy in North Dakota.

  2024cites this paper
• Validation of the Argentine version of the epistemic trust, mistrust, and credulity questionnaire

  2024cites this paper
• Let Me Explain What I Did or What I Would Have Done: An Empirical Study on the Effects of Explanations and Person-Likeness on Trust in and Understanding of Algorithms

  2024cites this paper
• The development of the Epistemic Trust Rating System (ETRS)

  2024cites this paper
• Going beyond political ideology: A computational analysis of civic trust in science

  2024cites this paper
• Values in public health: an argument from trust

  2024cites this paper
• Increasing Trust in Climate Vulnerability Projections

  2024cites this paper
• Objectivity, shared values, and trust

  2024influential citation
• How can we assess whether to trust collectives of scientists?

  2024cites this paper
• What is Philosophy of the Geosciences?

  2024cites this paper
• When should one be open-minded?

  2024cites this paper
• Epistemic Trust in Scientific Experts: A Moral Dimension

  2024influential citation
• The AI Review Lottery: Widespread AI-Assisted Peer Reviews Boost Paper Scores and Acceptance Rates

  2024cites this paper
• The evolution of vaccine hesitancy through the COVID-19 pandemic: A semi-structured interview study on booster and bivalent doses

  2024cites this paper
• Bridgman and the normative independence of science: an individual physicist in the shadow of the bomb

  2024cites this paper
• Value transparency and promoting warranted trust in science communication

  2024cites this paper
• Vigilant trust in scientific expertise

  2024cites this paper
• Earning epistemic trustworthiness: an impact assessment model

  2024cites this paper
• Science as public service

  2024cites this paper
• Populism, Research Integrity, and Trust. How Science-Related Populist Beliefs Shape the Relationship Between Ethical Conduct and Trust in Scientists

  2024cites this paper
• Fast Science

  2024cites this paper
• Investigation of the Effect of “The Poles: Soils Waiting to be Discovered” Activity on the Climate Change Awareness of Gifted 6th Grade Students

  2023cites this paper
• We Have No Satisfactory Social Epistemology of AI-Based Science

  2023cites this paper
• Trust in science moderates the effects of high/low threat communication on psychological reactance to COVID-19-related public health messages

  2023cites this paper
• Reliability models in cultural phylogenetics

  2023cites this paper
• Values as heuristics: a contextual empiricist account of assessing values scientifically

  2023cites this paper
• “Trust X, because Y”

  2023cites this paper
• How to do things with insecure extensions

  2023cites this paper
• On masks and masking: epistemic harms and science communication

  2023cites this paper
• Diverse patients’ attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence (AI) in diagnosis

  2023cites this paper
• Harmful Research and the Paradox of Credibility

  2023cites this paper
• Varying Evidential Standards as a Matter of Justice

  2023cites this paper
• AI as an Epistemic Technology

  2023cites this paper
• Norms for Academic Writing in the Era of Advanced Artificial Intelligence

  2023cites this paper
• The epistemic harms of direct-to-consumer genetic tests

  2023cites this paper
• Is economics credible? A critical appraisal of three examples from microeconomics

  2023cites this paper
• The curatorial view of assessment and the ethics of scientific advice: Beyond decisional autonomy towards distributive epistemic justice

  2023cites this paper
• Science communication and public trust in science

  2023cites this paper
• Social sciences in crisis: on the proposed elimination of the discussion section

  2023cites this paper
• Trustworthy Science Advice: The Case of Policy Recommendations

  2023cites this paper
• Cooperative Epistemic Trustworthiness

  2023cites this paper
• The replication crisis and philosophy

  2022cites this paper
• Informiertes Vertrauen in Wissenschaft: Lehren aus der COVID-19 Pandemie für das Verständnis naturwissenschaftlicher Grundbildung (scientific literacy)

  2022cites this paper
• Science as a moral system

  2022cites this paper
• The core of the matter: How do scientists judge trustworthiness of physical samples?

  2022cites this paper
• The limits of moral imagination

  2022cites this paper
• Vaccine Hesitancy: Some Concerns About Values and Trust, Comments on Vaccine Hesitancy by Maya J. Goldenberg

  2022cites this paper
• Scientific Consensus, Doctrinal Paradox and Discursive Dilemma

  2022cites this paper
• Trust in the Third Space of Science Education

  2022cites this paper
• Inductive risk: does it really refute value-freedom?

  2022influential citation
• Why Trust Raoult? How Social Indicators Inform the Reputations of Experts

  2022cites this paper
• Trust is the common denominator for COVID-19 vaccine acceptance: A literature review

  2022cites this paper
• Death Sentences Criminalization, Medicalization, and the Nature of Disease

  2022cites this paper
• Values in Science, Biodiversity Research, and the Problem of Particularity

  2022cites this paper
• Editorial: Public research and private knowledge—Science in times of diverse research funding

  2022cites this paper
• How to Handle Reasonable Scientific Disagreement: The Case of COVID-19

  2022cites this paper
• Epistemological and educational issues in teaching practice-oriented scientific research: roles for philosophers of science

  2022cites this paper
• Science advice: making credences accurate

  2022cites this paper
• How to trust a scientist.

  2022cites this paper
• No one solution to the "new demarcation problem"?: A view from the trenches.

  2022cites this paper
• Reference Service, Government Information, and COVID-19

  2022cites this paper
• Epistemological and educational issues in teaching practice-oriented scientific research: roles for philosophers of science

  2022cites this paper