MaTrEx: The DCU Machine Translation System for ICON 2008

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2008

• Venue

  Unknown venue

• Publication date

  Unknown publication date

• Fields of study

  Linguistics, Computer Science

• Identifiers

  No identifiers available.

• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Exploiting Parallel Treebanks to Improve Phrase-Based Statistical Machine Translation

  2009cited by this paper
• MaTrEx: The DCU MT System for WMT 2008

  2008cited by this paper
• Moses: Open Source Toolkit for Statistical Machine Translation

  2007cited by this paper
• Supertagged Phrase-Based Statistical Machine Translation

  2007cited by this paper
• Exploiting source similarity for SMT using context-informed features

  2007cited by this paper
• Factored Translation Models

  2007cited by this paper
• Bootstrapping Word Alignment via Word Packing

  2007cited by this paper
• MaTrEx: the DCU machine translation system for IWSLT 2007

  2007cited by this paper
• A Modified Joint Source-Channel Model for Transliteration

  2006cited by this paper
• MATREX: DCU machine translation system for IWSLT 2006.

  2006cited by this paper
• Clause Restructuring for Statistical Machine Translation

  2005cited by this paper
• Robust large-scale EBMT with marker-based segmentation

  2004cited by this paper
• A Systematic Comparison of Various Statistical Alignment Models

  2003cited by this paper
• Statistical Phrase-Based Translation

  2003cited by this paper
• Minimum Error Rate Training in Statistical Machine Translation

  2003cited by this paper
• SRILM - an extensible language modeling toolkit

  2002cited by this paper
• An Empirical Study of Smoothing Techniques for Language Modeling

  1996cited by this paper
• The necessity of syntax markers: Two experiments with artificial languages

  1979cited by this paper

• English-Hindi Translation - Obtaining Mediocre Results with Bad Data and Fancy Models ∗

  2009cites this paper