Breaking the Waves in Science Studies

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2003

• Venue

  Social Studies of Science

• Publication date

  2003-06-01

• Fields of study

  Sociology, Philosophy

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1177/03063127030333004
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Seasick on the Third Wave? Subverting the Hegemony of Propositionalism

  2003cited by this paper
• Science Studies and Activism

  2002cited by this paper
• Science and statistical victim: modernizing knowledge in breast implant litigation.

  2002cited by this paper
• Suspect Identities

  2001cited by this paper
• Book Review: A House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodernist Myths about Science

  1999cited by this paper
• A house built on sand : exposing postmodernist myths about science

  1998cited by this paper
• Science on Trial: The Clash of Medical Evidence and the Law in the Breast Implant Case

  1996cited by this paper
• Science at the Bar

  1995cited by this paper
• Book-Review - the Golem - what Everyone Should Know about Science

  1993cited by this paper
• Science, Politics, and the Renegotiation of Expertise at EPA

  1992cited by this paper
• The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers.

  1991cited by this paper
• The descent of Icarus : science and the transformation of contemporary democracy

  1990cited by this paper
• Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society

  1989cited by this paper
• Contested Boundaries in Policy-Relevant Science

  1987cited by this paper
• Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life

  1987cited by this paper
• Risk management and political culture

  1986cited by this paper
• Stages in the Empirical Programme of Relativism

  1981influential reference

• The Science of Repair

  2026cites this paper
• Advising decision-makers: a new typology of scientific bodies in global environmental governance

  2025cites this paper
• Sociology of the new media environment in the western post-truth society

  2025cites this paper
• Redefining expertise: how proponents and opponents of alternative therapies evaluate expertise

  2024cites this paper
• The eye of the beholder: how do public health researchers interpret regression coefficients? A qualitative study

  2024cites this paper
• Social media stitching as online argument in the OBGYN and pregnancy community

  2024cites this paper
• Networked advocacy and social media: conceptualizing persuasion at a network scale

  2024cites this paper
• Network dynamics in public health advisory systems: A comparative analysis of scientific advice for COVID‐19 in Belgium, Quebec, Sweden, and Switzerland

  2024cites this paper
• Becoming Scientific-Environmental Citizens Through Citizen Science in China

  2024cites this paper
• Establishing veritocracy: Society, truth and science

  2024cites this paper
• EXPERTISE AND FORECASTING IN THE CONTEXT OF POST-NORMAL SCIENCE

  2023cites this paper
• Entre lo técnico y lo político: los estudios sociales de la ciencia y la tecnología y el debate sobre el expertise

  2023cites this paper
• Post-normal science in practice: Reflections from scientific experts working on the European agri-food policy nexus

  2023cites this paper
• Studies of expertise and experience as a way to overcome the crisis of expert knowledge: The problem of philosophical foundations

  2023cites this paper
• Meaningful participation of schools in scientific research through contributory citizen science projects

  2023cites this paper
• From “Concealment” to “Deconcealment”: Lay Knowledge and Its Generation Mechanism for Issues of Environmental Risk in China

  2023cites this paper
• Rationalized and Extended Democracy

  2023cites this paper
• Why we need a Public Understanding of Social Science

  2023cites this paper
• Environmental expertise for social transformation: roles and responsibilities for social science

  2022cites this paper
• Top-down or bottom-up? Norwegian climate mitigation policy as a contested hybrid of policy approaches

  2022cites this paper
• «Hands off the olive trees!»: the epistemic war in the Xylella fastidiosa epidemic in Italy. A Computer-Assisted Text Analysis of User-generated content on social media

  2022cites this paper
• Citizen Science in Deliberative Systems: Participation, Epistemic Injustice, and Civic Empowerment

  2022cites this paper
• The Routledge History of American Science

  2022cites this paper
• Building Better Machine Learning Models for Rhetorical Analyses: The Use of Rhetorical Feature Sets for Training Artificial Neural Network Models

  2022cites this paper
• Deepening democracy for the governance toward just transitions in agri-food systems

  2022cites this paper
• La tercera misión de la universidad y sus múltiples sentidos en debate: extensión, transferencia, vinculación, compromiso, coproducción e impacto social de las prácticas académicas y los modos de producción de conocimiento

  2022cites this paper
• “Have a Digital Highway but also have speed limits”: Exploring Public Resistance to Cell Tower Radiation in India

  2022cites this paper
• Mediatized Engagements with Technologies: “Reviewing” the Video Assistant Referee at the 2018 World Cup

  2022cites this paper
• Process expertise in policy advice: Designing collaboration in collaboration

  2021cites this paper
• SAGE advice and political decision-making: ‘Following the science’ in times of epistemic uncertainty

  2021cites this paper
• Doing flood risk modelling differently: Evaluating the potential for participatory techniques to broaden flood risk management decision‐making

  2021cites this paper
• Whose expertise counts? Assisted migration and the politics of knowledge in British Columbia’s public forests

  2021cites this paper
• ‘The more we verify it, the more truth there is’: Producing the truth and expertise in public policy

  2021cites this paper
• Auras of Detection: Power and Knowledge in Drug Prohibition

  2021cites this paper
• Unraveling the politics of ‘doing inclusion’ in transdisciplinarity for sustainable transformation

  2021influential citation
• In pursuit of socially-minded data-intensive innovation in banking: A focus group study of public expectations of digital innovation in banking

  2021cites this paper
• Design multiple: How different configurations of participation matter in design practice

  2021cites this paper
• Science, health, and human rights

  2021cites this paper
• Hybrid collectivity

  2021cites this paper
• Seeds of change? Seed transfer governance in British Columbia: insights from history

  2021cites this paper
• Playing by the rules? How community actors use experts and evidence to oppose coal seam gas activity in Australia

  2021cites this paper
• Diversifying the Deliberative Turn: Toward an Agonistic RRI

  2021cites this paper
• Post-Truth Society? An Eliasian Sociological Analysis of Knowledge in the 21st Century

  2021cites this paper
• Under careful construction: combining findings, arguments, and values into robust health care coverage decisions

  2021cites this paper
• Expertise and its Tensions

  2020cites this paper
• Social science studies of the environment in Taiwan: what can the international community learn from work published within Taiwan?

  2020cites this paper
• Drowning ‘Truths’: Contrasting experiential-experts’ perceptions with official-experts drowning reports on Australia's hazardous coasts

  2020cites this paper
• An Unlikely Symbiosis: Science and Law

  2020cites this paper
• What’s the Problem Represented to Be? Problem Definition Critique as a Tool for Evaluative Thinking

  2020cites this paper
• The interplay of authority and expertise in online self-improvement communities

  2020influential citation
• The insides and outsides of parliamentary politics: Introduction to a special section of Social Studies of Science on parliamentary practices

  2020cites this paper
• Realizing the Basic Income

  2020cites this paper
• Bacillus cereus & Bacillus pumilus Harvested from a Copper Roof Inhibit the Growth of Other Microorganisms

  2020cites this paper
• License to judge: fleshing out expertise in cultural policy

  2019cites this paper
• Environmental Expertise

  2019cites this paper
• The Practices Shaping the Entrepreneurial Subject

  2019cites this paper
• Localizing Detroit’s Food System: Boundary-Work and the Politics of Experiential Expertise

  2019cites this paper
• Expertise in rural development: A conceptual and empirical analysis

  2019influential citation
• Acquiring the Virtue of Truth-Speaking in Science

  2019cites this paper
• A Little Knowledge is a Dangerous Thing: Excess Confidence Explains Negative Attitudes Towards Science

  2019cites this paper
• Science and Christian Ethics

  2019cites this paper
• Wissenschaft aus kultursoziologischer Perspektive

  2019cites this paper
• Bibliography

  2019cites this paper
• Citizen Science Ethics: It’s a Community Thing

  2019cites this paper
• Teleology and the Craft of Science

  2019cites this paper
• Conclusion

  2019cites this paper
• Ability and authority?: Studies on the constructedness and expansion of expertise in the contemporary public sphere

  2019cites this paper
• Introduction

  2019cites this paper
• How experts understand the public in vaccination controversies in Chile

  2019cites this paper
• ‘We Want Experts’: Fracking and the Case of Expert Excess

  2019cites this paper
• Subjectivity, Truth, and Theological Anthropology

  2019cites this paper
• Index

  2019cites this paper
• The Scientist Entrepreneur

  2019cites this paper
• How Does Science Fit into Society? The Fractal Model

  2019cites this paper
• Systematicity is necessary but not sufficient: on the problem of facsimile science

  2019cites this paper
• Electing the experts: Expertise and independence in the UN human rights treaty bodies

  2019cites this paper
• A good "doctor" is hard to find: Assessing uncredentialed expertise in assisted injection.

  2019cites this paper
• Experimentation in the sociology of science: Representational and generative registers in the imitation game.

  2019cites this paper
• What Roles Can Lay Citizens Play in the Making of Public Knowledge?

  2019cites this paper
• There’s No Such Thing as a Scientific Controversy

  2019cites this paper
• What Is Science? (And Why Does This Matter?)

  2019cites this paper
• Reshaping the Entrepreneurial Subject of Science

  2019cites this paper
• General Editor’s Preface

  2019cites this paper
• Integrating community service learning into a master’s program

  2019cites this paper
• What do we know about public attitudes towards experts? Reviewing survey data in the United Kingdom and European Union

  2019cites this paper
• Cómo los expertos entienden al público en las controversias sobre vacunación en Chile

  2019cites this paper
• The Crisis in Science

  2019cites this paper
• Policy analysis in the face of complexity: What kind of knowledge to tackle wicked problems?

  2019cites this paper
• How Empowering Is Citizen Science? Access, Credits, and Governance for the Crowd

  2019cites this paper
• Contested Knowledges: Large Dams and Mega-Hydraulic Development

  2019cites this paper
• Geographies of expertise in the dieselgate scandal: From a politics of accuracy to a politics of acceptability?

  2019cites this paper
• Environmental Expertise as Group Belonging

  2018cites this paper
• Citizen science for development: Potential role of mobile phones in information sharing on ticks and tick-borne diseases in Laikipia, Kenya

  2018cites this paper
• Book Review: Towards a Rhetoric of Medical Law

  2018cites this paper
• No “Real” Experts: Unexpected Agreement Over Disagreement in STS and Philosophy of Science

  2018influential citation
• Recasting Participation in Drug Policy

  2018cites this paper
• Scientific Expertise and Engagement Experts

  2018cites this paper
• Disrupting polarized discourses: Can we get out of the ruts of environmental conflicts?

  2018cites this paper
• Expert Failure by Roger Koppl

  2018cites this paper
• Relationship‐building between climate scientists and publics as an alternative to information transfer

  2018cites this paper