Uncertainties, Plurality, and Robustness in Climate Research and Modeling: On the Reliability of Climate Prognoses

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2015

• Venue

  Journal for General Philosophy of Science

• Publication date

  2015-07-21

• Fields of study

  Physics, Economics, Environmental Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1007/S10838-015-9304-X
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Mit allem rechnen. Zur Philosophie der Computersimulation

  2015cited by this paper
• About ``scientific consensus on climate change''

  2014cited by this paper
• Epistemic Trust in Science

  2013cited by this paper
• The role of ‘complex’ empiricism in the debates about satellite data and climate models

  2012influential reference
• Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming (review)

  2012cited by this paper
• Pluralism and objectivity: Exposing and breaking a circle

  2012cited by this paper
• Verification of greenhouse gas emission reductions: the prospect of atmospheric monitoring in polluted areas

  2011cited by this paper
• Quantifying greenhouse-gas emissions from atmospheric measurements: a critical reality check for climate legislation

  2011cited by this paper
• Evaluation, characterization, and communication of uncertainty by the intergovernmental panel on climate change—an introductory essay

  2011cited by this paper
• Science in a Democratic Society

  2011cited by this paper
• When Climate Models Agree: The Significance of Robust Model Predictions*

  2011influential reference
• Confirmation and Robustness of Climate Models

  2010influential reference
• Value judgements and the estimation of uncertainty in climate modeling

  2010influential reference
• Earth science: The climate machine

  2010cited by this paper
• Climate Change and the Integrity of Science

  2010cited by this paper
• Holism, entrenchment, and the future of climate model pluralism

  2010cited by this paper
• Climate change 2007: the physical science basis

  2010influential reference
• Bias and values in scientific research

  2009cited by this paper
• Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal

  2009cited by this paper
• Review of Roger S. Pielke, Jr., The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics

  2008cited by this paper
• The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics – By Roger A. Pielke, Jr

  2008cited by this paper
• The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics

  2007cited by this paper
• Making sense of science in policy and politics

  2007cited by this paper
• Why Is Climate Sensitivity So Unpredictable?

  2007cited by this paper
• CLIMATE CHANGE DEBATES

  2007cited by this paper
• Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis Summary for Policymakers

  2007cited by this paper
• Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis

  2007cited by this paper
• Understanding Pluralism in Climate Modeling

  2006cited by this paper
• How Well Do We Understand and Evaluate Climate Change Feedback Processes

  2006cited by this paper
• Scientific basis

  2005cited by this paper
• How science makes environmental controversies worse

  2004influential reference
• Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press☆

  2004cited by this paper
• The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change

  2004cited by this paper
• The Fate of Knowledge

  2001cited by this paper
• Earth Matters: The Earth Sciences, Philosophy, and the Claims of Community

  2001cited by this paper
• Inductive Risk and Values in Science

  2000cited by this paper
• Top Down versus Bottom Up

  1999cited by this paper
• The Scientific Basis

  1995cited by this paper
• Objectivity in Experimental Inquiry: Breaking Data-Technique Circles

  1995cited by this paper
• Replicability, Reproducibility, and Robustness: Comments on Harry Collins

  1991cited by this paper
• Science as Social Knowledge. Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry

  1990cited by this paper
• The Scientist Qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments

  1953cited by this paper

• Climate Science

  2024cites this paper
• The Vices and Virtues of Instrumentalized Knowledge

  2023cites this paper
• Fifteen Years of Controversy on Solar Geoengineering in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom and Australia

  2020cites this paper
• Ontological Choices and the Value-Free Ideal

  2015cites this paper