Do Maximizers Predict Better than Satisficers?: Maximizing vs. Satisficing and Accuracy

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2013

• Venue

  Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

• Publication date

  Unknown publication date

• Fields of study

  Economics, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.1002/BDM.763
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Why are maximizers less happy than satisficers? Because they maximize positive and negative outcomes

  2010cited by this paper
• Are maximizers really unhappy? The measurement of maximizing tendency

  2008cited by this paper
• The trouble with overconfidence.

  2008cited by this paper
• Individual differences in adult decision-making competence.

  2007cited by this paper
• Overconfidence and trading volume

  2007cited by this paper
• Maximizers versus satisficers: Decision-making styles, competence, and outcomes

  2007cited by this paper
• Contrasting stochastic and support theory accounts of subadditivity

  2007cited by this paper
• Doing Better but Feeling Worse

  2006cited by this paper
• Negative Consequences of Dichotomizing Continuous Predictor Variables

  2003cited by this paper
• Maximizing versus satisficing: happiness is a matter of choice.

  2002cited by this paper
• Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects

  2002cited by this paper
• What makes you think you're so popular? Self-evaluation maintenance and the subjective side of the "friendship paradox"

  2001cited by this paper
• Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors

  2000cited by this paper
• Self-determination: The tyranny of freedom.

  2000cited by this paper
• Volume, Volatility, Price, and Profit When All Traders Are Above Average

  1998cited by this paper
• Reasoning and the weighting of attributes in attitude judgments

  1996cited by this paper
• Determinants of Overconfidence and Miscalibration: The Roles of Random Error and Ecological Structure☆

  1996cited by this paper
• Personal contact, individuation, and the better-than-average effect.

  1995cited by this paper
• Simultaneous Over- and Underconfidence: The Role of Error in Judgment Processes.

  1994cited by this paper
• Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex.

  1994cited by this paper
• Thinking too much: introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions.

  1991cited by this paper
• Probabilistic forecasts of stock prices and earnings: The hazards of nascent expertise

  1991cited by this paper
• The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.

  1986cited by this paper
• External correspondence: Decompositions of the mean probability score

  1982cited by this paper
• ARE WE ALL LESS RISKY AND MORE SKILLFUL THAN OUR FELLOW DRIVERS

  1981cited by this paper
• A New Vector Partition of the Probability Score

  1973cited by this paper
• Scoring Rules and the Evaluation of Probability Assessors

  1969cited by this paper
• “Good” Probability Assessors

  1968cited by this paper
• A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice

  1955cited by this paper
• VERIFICATION OF FORECASTS EXPRESSED IN TERMS OF PROBABILITY

  1950cited by this paper

• Career indecision among Turkish female high school students: The effect of parenting and societal norms

  2022cites this paper
• When ‘Good Enough’ Is Not Enough: The Role of Maximizing or Satisficing Decision-Making Styles, Innovation Behavior, and Entrepreneurial Alertness in the Pursuit of New Business Opportunities

  2022cites this paper
• The influence of maximizing on personal saving intentions

  2021cites this paper
• Taking risks for the best: Maximizing and risk-taking tendencies

  2020cites this paper
• Maximizing Tendency Predicts Delayed Marriage Among Japanese Adults

  2020cites this paper
• Small Steps to Accuracy: Incremental Belief Updaters Are Better Forecasters

  2020cites this paper
• Is satisficing really satisfying? Satisficers exhibit greater threat than maximizers during choice overload.

  2020cites this paper
• Maximizing Scales Do Not Reliably Predict Maximizing Behavior in Decisions from Experience

  2018cites this paper
• Maximizing versus satisficing in the digital age: Disjoint scales and the case for “construct consensus”

  2018cites this paper
• Use of online weather information in everyday decision‐making by laypeople and implications for communication of weather information

  2016cites this paper
• Should Retail Trade Companies Avoid Recruiting Maximisers

  2015cites this paper
• Maximization and Search for Alternatives in Decision Situations With and Without Loss of Options

  2015cites this paper
• The effectiveness of electronic word of mouth in the hospital care industry

  2014cites this paper
• Time flies when you maximize - maximizers and satisficers perceive time differently when making decisions.

  2013cites this paper
• The role of actively open-minded thinking in information acquisition, accuracy, and calibration

  2013cites this paper