Do mixed item formats threaten test unidimensionality? Results from a standardized math achievement test

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2016

• Venue

  Unknown venue

• Publication date

  Unknown publication date

• Fields of study

  Mathematics, Education, Psychology

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.4473/TPM23.1.2
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• EMERGING PROBLEMS AND IRT-BASED OPERATIONAL SOLUTIONS IN LARGE-SCALE PROGRAMS OF STUDENT ASSESSMENT: THE ITALIAN CASE

  2015cited by this paper
• Differential Item Functioning (DIF) among Spanish-Speaking English Language Learners (ELLs) in State Science Tests.

  2013cited by this paper
• Gender DIF in Reading and Mathematics Tests With Mixed Item Formats

  2012cited by this paper
• The Contribution of Constructed Response Items to Large Scale Assessment: Measuring and Understanding Their Impact.

  2012cited by this paper
• Gender and Performance in Accounting Examinations: Exploring the Impact of Examination Format

  2012cited by this paper
• Why Is Performance on Multiple‐Choice Tests and Constructed‐Response Tests Not More Closely Related? Theory and an Empirical Test*

  2010influential reference
• Multiple-choice versus open-ended response formats of reading test items: A two-dimensional IRT analysis

  2010cited by this paper
• Multidimensional IRT models for the assessment of competencies

  2009cited by this paper
• Using Multiple-choice Tests to Evaluate Students' Understanding of Accounting

  2008cited by this paper
• Multiple-Choice Tests and Student Understanding: What Is the Connection?

  2005cited by this paper
• Comparing Multidimensional and Unidimensional Proficiency Classifications: Multidimensional IRT as a Diagnostic Aid

  2003cited by this paper
• A New Look at the Influence of Guessing on the Reliability of Multiple-Choice Tests

  2003cited by this paper
• Construct Equivalence of Multiple-Choice and Constructed-Response Items: A Random Effects Synthesis of Correlations

  2003cited by this paper
• Assessing Learning Outcomes: A Comparison of Multiple-Choice and Short-Answer Questions in a Marketing Context

  2003cited by this paper
• An introduction to multidimensional measurement using Rasch models.

  2003cited by this paper
• Comparison of different item types in terms of latent trait in mathematics assessment

  2002cited by this paper
• An empirical investigation demonstrating the multidimensional DIF paradigm: A cognitive explanation for DIF

  2001cited by this paper
• Test Stakes and Item Format Interactions

  2000cited by this paper
• Influences of Item Content and Format on the Dimensionality of Tests Combining Multiple-Choice and Open-Response Items: An Application of the Poly-DIMTEST Procedure.

  1999cited by this paper
• Cognition and the question of test item format

  1999cited by this paper
• Gender Differences in Mathematics and Science on a High School Proficiency Exam: The Role of Response Format

  1998cited by this paper
• A Cognitive Analysis of Gender Differences on Constructed-Response and Multiple-Choice Assessments in Mathematics.

  1998cited by this paper
• Equal Opportunity in the Classroom: Test Construction in a Diversity-Sensitive Environment

  1998cited by this paper
• Calibration and Scoring of Tests With Multiple-Choice and Constructed-Response Item Types

  1998influential reference
• The Multidimensional Random Coefficients Multinomial Logit Model

  1997cited by this paper
• Differential Item Functioning and Male-Female Differences on Multiple-Choice Tests in Economics

  1997cited by this paper
• Factor Analytic Methods for Determining Whether Multiple-Choice and Constructed-Response Tests Measure the Same Construct.

  1996cited by this paper
• Cognitive Complexity and the Comparability of Multiple-Choice and Constructed-Response Test Formats

  1994cited by this paper
• Reasonable mean-square fit values

  1994influential reference
• Are Tests Comprising Both Multiple‐Choice and Free‐Response Items Necessarily Less Unidimensional Than Multiple‐Choice Tests?An Analysis of Two Tests

  1994cited by this paper
• Performance Assessments or Multiple Choice

  1993cited by this paper
• COMBINING MULTIPLE-CHOICE AND CONSTRUCTED RESPONSE TEST SCORES: TOWARD A MARXIST THEORY OF TEST CONSTRUCTION

  1992cited by this paper
• Essays and multiple-choice tests as predictors of college freshman GPA

  1991cited by this paper
• Equivalence of Free-Response and Multiple-Choice Items

  1991cited by this paper
• Gender Differences in Multiple‐Choice Tests: The Role of Differential Guessing Tendencies

  1991cited by this paper
• Adaptive EAP Estimation of Ability in a Microcomputer Environment

  1982cited by this paper
• Rating scale analysis

  1982cited by this paper
• Estimating the Dimension of a Model

  1978cited by this paper
• A new look at the statistical model identification

  1974cited by this paper
• Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain

  1966cited by this paper

• Impact of Violating Unidimensionality on Rasch Calibration for Mixed-Format Tests

  2024cites this paper
• The Experimental Study of the Effect of Functional-Variational Factors on the Results of Linguistic Testing

  2022cites this paper
• The study of the impact of various question formats and their combination variability on test results

  2021cites this paper
• The research of the effect of different question forms and their combination variability on the results of testing

  2020cites this paper
• Italian translation and psychometric validation of the Manual Ability Measure-36 (MAM-36) and its correlation with an objective measure of upper limb function in patients with multiple sclerosis

  2020cites this paper
• Placing Multiple Tests on a Common Scale Using a Post-test Anchor Design: Effects of Item Position and Order on the Stability of Parameter Estimates

  2018cites this paper
• Measuring Quality of Classroom Interactions in Italian Primary School: Structural Validity of the CLASS K–3

  2018cites this paper
• EXAMINATION OF DIMENSIONALITY AND LATENT TRAIT SCORES ON MIXED-FORMAT TESTS

  2018cites this paper