Acceptance of a Payment for Ecosystem Services Scheme: The Decisive Influence of Collective Action

No abstract is available for this paper.

• Publication year

  2017

• Venue

  Environmental Values

• Publication date

  2017-04-01

• Fields of study

  Agricultural and Food Sciences, Sociology, Business, Environmental Science

• Identifiers
  DOI 10.3197/096327117X14847335385517
• External record

  Open on Semantic Scholar

• Source metadata

  Semantic Scholar

• No claims are published for this paper.

• No concepts are published for this paper.

• Social Construction of Reality

  2018cited by this paper
• Grounded Theory Method

  2018cited by this paper
• The Institutions

  2018cited by this paper
• Towards a power-sensitive and socially-informed analysis of payments for ecosystem services (PES): Addressing the gaps in the current debate

  2015cited by this paper
• Governance of Ecosystem Services: Lessons learned for sustainable institutions

  2015cited by this paper
• Institutions and the Environment

  2014cited by this paper
• Payments for ecosystem services: durable habits, dubious nudges, and doubtful efficacy

  2014cited by this paper
• Rhetoric as a Means for Sustainable Development Policy

  2014cited by this paper
• Constructing Grounded Theory

  2014cited by this paper
• Investigating the influence of the institutional organisation of agri-environmental schemes on scheme adoption

  2013cited by this paper
• Les risques de pollution liés à l’agriculture

  2013cited by this paper
• Development Through Bricolage: Rethinking Institutions for Natural Resource Management

  2012cited by this paper
• Studies on Agri-environmental Measures: A Survey of the Literature

  2012cited by this paper
• Coûts de transaction et adoption des MAE territorialisées à enjeu eau

  2012cited by this paper
• Encouraging collaboration for the provision of ecosystem services at a landscape scale—Rethinking agri-environmental payments

  2012cited by this paper
• ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE OF AGRICULTURE AT A GLANCE

  2012cited by this paper
• Directive cadre sur l’eau (DCE) dans le secteur agricole

  2011cited by this paper
• Le dispositif des MAEt pour l’enjeu eau: une fausse bonne idée ?

  2011cited by this paper
• How much green for the buck? Estimating additional and windfall effects of French agro-environmental schemes by DID-matching

  2010cited by this paper
• The introduction of Entry Level Stewardship in England: Extension or dilution in agri-environment policy?

  2010cited by this paper
• Factors affecting farmers’ acceptance of conservation measures—A case study from north-eastern Germany

  2010cited by this paper
• Stakeholder involvement in agri-environmental policy making--learning from a local- and a state-level approach in Germany.

  2009cited by this paper
• An institutional analysis of methods for environmental appraisal

  2009cited by this paper
• Investigating farmers' preferences for the design of agri-environment schemes: a choice experiment approach

  2008cited by this paper
• Participatory decision making on agri-environmental programmes: A case study from Sachsen-Anhalt (Germany)

  2008cited by this paper
• Postures énonciatives et mondes lexicaux stabilisés en analyse statistique de discours

  2007influential reference
• Factors influencing the acceptance of nature conservation measures--a qualitative study in Switzerland.

  2007cited by this paper
• Negotiating the boundary between state-led and farmer approaches to knowing nature: An analysis of UK agri-environment schemes

  2006cited by this paper
• Measuring Ideas More Effectively: An Analysis of Bush and Kerry's National Security Speeches

  2005cited by this paper
• Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts

  2005cited by this paper
• Conserving English Landscapes: Land Managers and Agri-Environmental Policy

  2003cited by this paper
• Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research

  2003cited by this paper
• An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method

  2002cited by this paper
• Volitional pragmatism

  2002influential reference
• The Grounded Theory Perspective: Conceptualization Contrasted With Description

  2001cited by this paper
• Financial Imperative or Conservation Concern? EU Farmers' Motivations for Participation in Voluntary Agri-Environmental Schemes

  2000cited by this paper
• Farm-level constraints on agri-environmental scheme participation: a transactional perspective.

  2000cited by this paper
• Can We Talk Ourselves into Sustainability? The Role of Discourse in the Environmental Policy Process

  1999cited by this paper
• The Development of Environmental Thinking in Economics

  1999cited by this paper
• Extracting team mental models through textual analysis

  1997cited by this paper
• Institutions and Organizations

  1997cited by this paper
• Interactive Minds (A)

  1997cited by this paper
• Interacting minds in a life-span perspective: A cultural-historical approach to culture and cognitive development.

  1996cited by this paper
• Recruiting the new conservationists: Farmers' adoption of agri-environmental schemes in the U.K.

  1995cited by this paper
• Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches

  1995cited by this paper
• L’analyse par théorisation ancrée

  1994cited by this paper
• Targeting for nature conservation in agricultural policy

  1993cited by this paper
• The theory of communicative action

  1991cited by this paper
• The Limits of Organization

  1975cited by this paper
• The Idea of Justice

  1967cited by this paper
• The Moral Judgment of the Child.

  1933cited by this paper
• The Moral Judgment of the Child

  1932cited by this paper

• A comparative analysis of agri-environment schemes in China, Europe and US: Potential for improvement

  2025cites this paper
• Economic valuation of groundwater over-exploitation in the Maghreb

  2025cites this paper
• Participation in individual and collective agri-environmental schemes: A synthesis using the Theory of Planned Behaviour

  2024cites this paper
• Collaborative models and uncertain water quality in payments for watershed services: China’s Jiuzhou River eco-compensation

  2024cites this paper
• Coopérative agricole : un intermédiaire possible de projets de développement territorial ?

  2024cites this paper
• Linking Beekeepers’ and Farmers’ Preferences towards Pollination Services in Greek Kiwi Systems

  2023cites this paper
• Understanding farmers’ motivations to produce pulses and promote better agroecological practices

  2023cites this paper
• Public Opinion about Restrictive Driving Policy: Does Political Affiliation Matter? A case study of Odd-Even Restrictive Driving Policy in Delhi, India

  2023cites this paper
• Crafting Collective Management Institutions in Messy Real-World Settings: A Call for Action Research

  2022cites this paper
• The leader, the keeper, and the follower? A legitimacy perspective on the governance of varietal innovation systems for climate changes adaptation. The case of sunflower hybrids in France

  2022cites this paper
• Financial incentives for large-scale wetland restoration: Beyond markets to common asset trusts

  2021cites this paper
• Adopt to adapt? Farmers’ varietal innovation adoption in a context of climate change. The case of sunflower hybrids in France

  2021cites this paper
• Types of collective action problems and farmers’ willingness to accept agri-environmental schemes in Switzerland

  2021cites this paper
• Institutional Design and Performance of Markets for Watershed Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Literature Review

  2020cites this paper
• Watershed restoration in the Florida Everglades: Agricultural water management and long-term trends in nutrient outcomes in the Everglades Agricultural Area

  2020cites this paper
• An analysis of conservation practice adoption studies in agricultural human-natural systems.

  2019cites this paper
• Compelling collective action: Does a shared pollution cap incentivize farmer cooperation to restore water quality?

  2019influential citation
• Towards an Integrated Framework for the Governance of a Territorialised Agroecological Transition

  2019cites this paper
• A Framework of Payment for Ecosystem Services to Protect Cropland: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta in China

  2018cites this paper
• Knowledge, Expertise and Engagement

  2017cites this paper
• What is a legitimate conservation policy

  2017cites this paper
• Increasing the impact of collective incentives in payments for ecosystem services

  2017cites this paper
• Roads, Rights, and Rewards: Three Program Evaluations in Environmental and Resource Economics

  2017cites this paper